Scenario projections for future market potentials of biobased bulk chemicals

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 2261-2267

  Dornburg, Veronika ^a   Hermann, Barbara G ^a   Patel, Martin K ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GREENHOUSE GASES; MARKETING; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS;

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; FOSSIL RESOURCES;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

CHEMICAL AGENT; ORGANIC COMPOUND;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GREENHOUSE GASES; MARKETING; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELLULOSE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY USE; FOSSIL FUEL; FUTURE PROSPECT; GREENHOUSE GAS; NONRENEWABLE RESOURCE;

ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENT; EUROPE; FIELD EMISSION; FOSSIL; MARKETING;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CONSERVATION OF ENERGY RESOURCES; EUROPE;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 41649115062     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es0709167     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. EuropaBio: White Biotechnology: Gateway to a More Sustainable Future; European Association for Bioindustries: Brussels, 2003.
2. Hermann, B. G.; Blok, K.; Patel, M. Producing bio-based bulk chemicals using industrial biotechnology saves energy and combats climate change. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41 (22), 7915-7921.
3. BACAS: Industrial Biotechnology and Sustainable Chemistry; Royal Belgian Academy Council of Applied Science: Brussel, 2004.
4. EC: Towards a strategic vision of life sciences and biotechnology - consultation document; Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, 2001.
5. DOE/GO-10098-385: Plant/crop-based renewable resources 2020 - A vision to enhance U.S. economic security through plant/crop-based resource use; U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC,1998.
6. ETPSC: A European Technology Platform for Sustainable Chemistry: The vision for 2020 and beyond; European Technology Platform for Sustainable Chemistry: Brussels, 2004.
7. ECCP: European Climate Change Programme - Long Report, European Commission: Brussels, 2001.
8. Käb, H.; Lichtl, M.; Reske, J.; Klauß, M. Kompostierbare Verpackungen - Das Modellprojekt Kassel - Ergebnisse und Perspektiven. In: Bio- und Restabfallbehandlung VI, Wiemer, K.; Kern, M. Eds, Witzenhausen-Institut. Neues aus Forschung und Praxis, Witzenhausen, 2002.
9. Crank, M.; Patel, M.; Marscheider-Weidemann, F.; Schleich, J.; Hüsing, B.; Angerer, G.: Techno-economic Feasibility of Largescale Production of Bio-based Polymers in Europe (PRO-BIP); Report prepared for the European Commission's Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS): Sevilla, 2005.
10. Phylipsen, D.; Kerssemeeckers, M.; Blok, K.; Patel, M.; de Beer, J. Clean technologies in the materials sector - Current and future environmental performance of material technologies; Ecofys: Utrecht, 2002.
11. Hermann, B. G.; Patel, M. Today's and tomorrow's bio-based bulk chemicals from white bio technology-atechno-economic analysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2007, 136 (3), 361-388.
12. Patel, M.; Crank, M.; Dornburg, V.; Hermann, B.; Roes, L.; Hüsing, B.; Overbeek, van, L.; Terragni, F.; Recchia, E. Medium and long-term opportunities and risks of the biotechnological production of bulk chemicals from renewable resources - The BREW Project: Utrecht University: Utrecht, 2006.
13. CEFIC: Capacity and Production data, http://petrochemistry.net, European Chemical Industry Council Brussels, 2005.
14. Weissermel, K.; Arpe, H.-J. Industrial Organic Chemistry, Fourth Completely Revised ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2003.
15. SRI: PEP Yearbook 2000. SRI Consulting, 2000.
16. Short-term Energy Outlook - May 2005. Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy: Washington, DC, 2005.
17. IEA: World Energy Outlook; International Energy Agency: Paris, 2004.
18. Special report on Emission Scenarios (SRES); International Panel on Climate Change: 2000.
19. An analysis of plastics consumption and recovery in Western Europe 2001 & 2002; Association of Plastics Manufacturers in Europe: Brussels, 2003.
20. 2 emissions and carbon storage resulting from the non-energy use of fossil fuels in the Netherlands, NEAT results for 1993-1999. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2005, 45 (3), 251-274.
21. 2 emissions from non-energy use with the non-energy use emission accounting tables (NEAT) model. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2005, 45 (3), 226-250.
22. 2 Emissions from the Non-Energy Use of Fossil Fuels in Germany; Utrecht University: Utrecht, 2007.
23. Lejour, A. Quantifying four Scenarios for Europe; CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis: The Hague, 2003.
24. Chateau, B.; Biberacher, M.; Birnbaum, U.; Hamacher, T.; Lako, P.; Martinsen, D.; Patel, M.; Pospischil, W.; Quercia, N.; Smekens, K.: VLEEM 2 (Very Long Term Energy-Environment Model); VLEEM Consortium: Grenoble,2005.
25. CEFIC: Facts and figures - The European industry in a worldwide perspective, January 2005, http://www.cefic.org/factsandfigures/level02/ profile_index.html, European Chemical Industry Council, Brussels, 2005.
26. FAOSTAT, Agricultural data - Land, last updated 4 April 2005; Food and Agriculture Orginaztion of the United Nations (FAO): 2005.
27. Rogner, H. H. Energy Resources. In: World Energy Assessment. Goldemberg, J. Ed., Washington DC, 2005.