Virtual 3D planning of acetabular fracture reduction

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 547-552

  Citak, Musa ^a   Gardner, Michael J ^b   Kendoff, Daniel ^a   Tarte, Ségolène ^c   Krettek, Christian ^a   Nolte, Lutz Peter ^c   Hüfner, Tobias ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

3D imaging; Acetabular fracture; Iso C 3D; Preoperative planning; Virtual reduction

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM FRACTURE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FRACTURE REDUCTION; OPEN REDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT PLANNING; ACETABULUM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; FRACTURE; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; INJURY;

ACETABULUM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FRACTURE FIXATION; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 41649093647     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20517     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Mayo KA. 1994. Open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the acetabulum. Results in 163 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:31-37.
2. Moed BR, Carr SE, Gruson KI, et al. 2003. Computed tomographic assessment of fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum after operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:512-522.
3. Moed BR, Carr SE, Watson JT. 2000. Open reduction and internal fixation of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 377:57-67.
4. Ragnarsson B, Mjoberg B. Arthrosis after surgically treated acetabular fractures. A retrospective study of 60 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1992. 63:511-514.
5. Ruesch PD, Holdener H, Ciaramitaro M, et al. 1994. A prospective study of surgically treated acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:38-46.
6. Matta JM. 1996. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed oper-atively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1632-1645.
7. Olson SA, Matta JM. 1993. The computerized tomography subchondral arc: a new method of assessing acetabular articular continuity after fracture (a preliminary report). J Orthop Trauma 7:402-413.
8. Chan PS, Klimkiewicz JJ, Luchetti WT, et al. 1997. Impact of CT scan on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 11:484-489.
9. Kellam JF, Messer A. 1994. Evaluation of the role of coronal and sagittal axial CT scan reconstructions for the imaging of acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:152-159.
10. Tornetta P 3rd, Gorup J. 1996. Axial computed tomography of pilon fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 323:273-276.
11. Sanders R, Fortin P, DiPasquale T, et al. 1993. Operative treatment in 120 displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Results using a prognostic computed tomography scan classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:87-95.
12. Wicky S, Blaser PF, Blanc CH, et al. 2000. Comparison between standard radiography and spiral CT with 3D reconstruction in the evaluation, classification and management of tibial plateau fractures. Eur Radiol 10:1227-1232.
13. Falchi M, Rollandi GA. 2004. CT of pelvic fractures. Eur J Radiol 50:96-105.
14. Haveri M, Junila J, Suramo I, et al. 1998. Multiplanar and 3D CT of acetabular fractures. Acta Radiol 39:257-264.
15. Kickuth R, Laufer U, Hartung G, et al. 2002. 3D CT versus axial helical CT versus conventional tomography in the classification of acetabular fractures: a ROC analysis. Clin Radiol 57:140-145.
16. Kotsianos D, Rock C, Euler E, et al. 2001. [3-D imaging with a mobile surgical image enhancement equipment (ISO-C-3D). Initial examples of fracture diagnosis of peripheral joints in comparison with spiral CT and conventional radiography]. Unfallchirurg 104:834-838.
17. Rock C, Linsenmaier U, Brandl R, et al. 2001. [Introduction of a new mobile C-arm/CT combination equipment (ISO-C-3D). Initial results of 3-D sectional imaging]. Unfallchirurg 104:827-833.
18. Hufner T, Pohlemann T, Tarte S, et al. 2002. Computer-assisted fracture reduction of pelvic ring fractures: an in vitro study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 399:231-239.
19. Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, et al. 1986. Fractures of the acetabulum. A retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:230-240.
20. Marsh JL, Buckwalter J, Gelberman R, et al. 2002. Articular fractures: does an anatomic reduction really change the result? J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:1259-1271.
21. Heng PA, Cheng CY, Wong TT, et al. 2006. Virtual reality techniques. Application to anatomic visualization and orthopaedics training. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:5-12.
22. Tile M. 1980. Fractures of the acetabulum. Orthop Clin North Am 11:481-506.
23. Chao EY. 2003. Graphic-based musculoskeletal model for biomechanical analyses and animation. Med Eng Phys 25:201-212.
24. Tillander B, Ledin T, Nordqvist P, et al. 2004. A virtual reality trauma simulator. Med Teach 26:189-191.
25. Tsai MD, Hsieh MS, Jou SB. 2001. Virtual reality orthopedic surgery simulator. Comput Biol Med 31:333-351.
26. Cameron BM, Robb RA. 2006. Virtual-reality-assisted in-terventional procedures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:63-73.
27. Jaramaz B, Eckman K. 2006. Virtual reality simulation of fluoroscopic navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:30-34.
28. Reinig K, Lee C, Rubinstein D, et al. 2006. The United States military's thigh trauma simulator. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:45-56.