|
Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 812-813
|
Vaginal hysterectomy: An apparent exception to evidence-based decision making
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ABDOMINAL ADHESION;
ABDOMINAL DISEASE;
ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY;
ABDOMINAL SURGERY;
ADNEXECTOMY;
CERTIFICATION;
CESAREAN SECTION;
EDITORIAL;
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE;
HUMAN;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT;
RESIDENCY EDUCATION;
SALPINGOOOPHORECTOMY;
SURGEON;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION;
URINE INCONTINENCE;
VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
FEMALE;
GYNECOLOGY;
HUMANS;
HYSTERECTOMY, VAGINAL;
INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY;
|
EID: 41649090537
PISSN: 00297844
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816bfe45 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (13)
|
References (8)
|