Wet meadows of the alliance Molinion and their environmental gradients in Slovenia

Biologia

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 187-196

  Zelnik, Igor ^a   Čarni, Andraž ^a  

^a ANTON MELIK GEOGRAPHICAL INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Classification; Correlation; Ecological conditions; Floristic composition; Vegetation ecology

Indexed keywords

CARICI;

EID: 41649085577     PISSN: 00063088     EISSN: 13369563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/s11756-008-0042-y     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Banásová V., Jarolímek I., Oťaheľ ová H. Žaliberová M. 1998. Inundation Grasslands of the Morava river, Slovakia: Plant Communities and Factors Affecting Biodiversity, pp. 111-136. In: Joyce C. B. & Wade P. M. (eds.), European Wet Grasslands: Biodiversity, Management and Restoration. Wiley, Chichester, 340 pp.
2. Berlin G. A. I., Linusson A.-C. & Olsson E. G. A. 2000. Vegetation changes in semi-natural meadows with unchanged management in southern Sweden, 1965-1990. Acta Oecol. 21: 125-138.
3. Blackstock T. H., Stevens D. P., Stevens P. A., Mockridge C. P. & Yeo M. J. M. 1998. Edaphic relationship among Cirsio-Molinietum and related wet grassland communities in lowland Wales. J. Veg. Sci. 9: 431-444.
4. Botta-Dukát Z., Chytrý M., Hájková P. & Havlová M. 2005. Vegetation of lowland wet meadows along a climatic continentality gradient in Central Europe. Preslia 77: 89-111.
5. Braun-Blanquet J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. Springer, Wien, 865 pp.
6. Čarni A., Košir P., Marinšek A., Šilc U. & Zelnik I. 2007. Changes in structure, floristic composition and chemical soil properties in succession of birch forests. Periodicum Biologorum 109: 13-20.
7. De Mars H., Wassen M. J. & Peeters W. H. M. 1996. The effect of drainage and management on peat chemistry and nutrient deficiency in the former Jegrzina floodplain (N.E. Poland). Vegetatio 126: 59-72.
8. Dierschke H. 1990. Syntaxonomische Gliederung des Wirtschaftsgrü nlandes und verwandter Gesellschaften (M-A) in Westdeutschland. Berichten der R. Tüxen-Gesellschaft 2: 83-89.
9. Dierschke H. 1994. Pflanzensoziologie: Grundlagen und Methoden. Ulmer, Stuttgart, 684 pp.
10. Dierschke H. 1995. Syntaxonomical Survey of Molinio-Arrhenatheretea in Central Europe. Colloques Phytosociologiques 23: 387-399.
11. Ehrendorfer F. 1973. Liste der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Fischer, Stuttgart, 318 pp.
12. Ellenberg H., Weber H. E., Düll R., Wirth V., Werner W. & Paulissen D. 1992. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. 2. ed. Scripta Geobotanica 18: 1-258.
13. Ellmauer T. & Mucina L. 1993. Molinio-Arrhenatheretea, pp. 297-401. In: Mucina L., Grabherr G. & Ellmauer T. (eds), Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs, Teil 1. Fischer, Jena, Stuttgart.
14. Grevilliot F. & Muller S. 2002. Grassland ecotopes of the upper Meuse as reference for habitats and biodiversity restoration: A synthesis. Landscape Ecol. 17: 19-33.
15. Grootjans A. P., Fresco L. F. M., de Leeuw C. C. & Schipper P. C. 1996. Degeneration of species-rich Calthion palustris hay meadows; some considerations on the community concept. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 185-194.
16. Grootjans A. P., Hunneman H., Verkiel H. & van Andel J. 2005. Long-term effect of drainage on species richness of a fen meadow at different spatial scales. Basic Appl. Ecol. 6: 185-193.
17. Hájek M. & Hájková P. 2004. Environmental determinants of variation in Czech Calthion wet meadows: a synthesis of phytosociological data. Phytocoenologia 34: 33-54.
18. Hájek M. & Hekera P. 2004. Can seasonal variation in fen water chemistry influence the reliability of vegetation-environment analyses? Preslia 76: 1-14.
19. Hájková P., Hájek M. & Apostolova I. 2006. Diversity of wetland vegetation in the Bulgarian high mountains, main gradients and context-dependence of the pH role. Plant Ecol. 184: 111-130.
20. Härdtle W., Redecker B., Assmann T. & Meyer H. 2006. Vegetation responses to environmental conditions in floodplain grasslands: Prerequisites for preserving plant species diversity. Basic Appl. Ecol. 7: 280-288.
21. Havlová M. 2006. Syntaxonomical revision of the Molinion meadows in the Czech Republic. Preslia 78: 87-101.
22. Havlová M., Chytrý M. & Tichý L. 2004. Diversity of hay meadows in the Czech Republic: major types and environmental gradients. Phytocoenologia 34: 551-567.
23. Hoffman G. 1991. Metodenbuch. Band I, Die Untersuchung von Böden, 4th edn. VDLUFA, Darmstadt.
24. Hölzel N. & Otte A. 2004. Inter-annual variation in the soil seed bank of flood-meadows over two years with different flooding patterns. Plant Ecol. 174: 279-291.
25. Hrivnák R. 2004. The plant communities of Phragmitetalia in the catchment area of the Ipeľ river (Slovakia and Hungary) 2. Tall-sedge dominated wetlands (Magnocaricion elatae). Biologia 59: 457-476.
26. Hudon C., Gagnon P., Amyot J.-P., Letourneau G., Jean M., Plant C., Rioux D. & Deschenes M. 2005. Historical changes in herbaceous wetland distribution induced by hydrological conditions in Lake Saint-Pierre (St. Lawrence River, Quebec, Canada). Hydrobiol. 539: 205-224.
27. Ilijanić L. 1968. Die Ordnung Molinietalia in der Vegetation Nordostkroatiens. Acta Bot. Croatica 26-27: 161-267.
28. Jarolímek I., Banásová V., Oťaheľ ová H., 2000. Changes in alluvial grassland vegetation in relation to flood dynamics and soil moisture. Ekológia, Bratislava, 19: 39-53.
29. Joyce C. 2001. The sensitivity of a species-rich flood-meadow plant community to fertilizer nitrogen: the Lužnice river floodplain, Czech Republic. Plant Ecol. 155: 47-60.
30. Keddy A.P. 2000. Wetland ecology. Principles and conservation. Cambridge university press, Cambridge, 614 pp.
31. Kluse J. S & Allen Diaz B. H. 2005. Importance of soil moisture and its interaction with competition and clipping for two mountain meadow grasses. Plant Ecol. 176: 87-99.
32. McCrea A. R., Trueman I. C., Fullen M. A., Atkinson M. D. & Besenyei L. 2001. Relationships between soil characteristics and species richness in two botanically heterogeneous created meadows in the urban English West Midlands. Biol. Conserv. 97: 171-180.
33. Mekinda-Majaron T. 1995. Klimatografija Slovenije 1961-1990. Temperatura zraka. Hidrometeorološki zavod RS, Ljubljana.
34. Olde Venterink H., van der Vliet R. E. & Wassen M. J. 2001. Nutrient limitation along a productivity gradient in wet meadows. Plant Soil 234: 171-179.
35. Olde Venterink H., Davidsson T. E., Kiehl K. & Leonardson L. 2002. Impact of drying and re-wetting on N, P and K dynamics in a wetland soil. Plant Soil 243: 119-130.
36. Podani J. 2001. SYN-TAX-2000. Computer Programs for Data Analysis in Ecology and Systematics. Scientia Publishing, Budapest.
37. Sburlino G., Bracco F., Buffa G. & Andreis C. 1995. I prati a Molinia caerulea (L.) Moench della pianura Padana: sintassonomia, sincorologia, sinecologia. Fitosociologia 29: 67-87.
38. Schaffers A. P. 2002. Soil, biomass and management of seminatural vegetation. Plant Ecol. 158: 229-246.
39. Schröder H. K., Andersen H. E. & Kiehl K. 2005. Rejecting the mean: Estimating the response of fen plant species to environmental factors by non-linear quantile regression. J. Veg. Sci. 16: 373-382.
40. Stančić Z. 2005. Oenantho silaifoliae-Alopecuretum pratensis, a new association of grassland vegetation in Croatia. Periodicum Biologorum 107: 89-99.
41. Šilc U. & Čarni A. 2005. Changes in weed vegetation on extensively managed fields of central Slovenia between 1939 and 2002. Biologia 60: 409-416.
42. ter Braak C. J. F. & Šmilauer P. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide. Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca.
43. ter Braak C. J. F. & Verdonschot P. F. M. 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat. Sci. 57: 255-289.
44. ter Braak C. J. F. & Wiertz J. 1994. On the statistical analysis of vegetation change: a wetland affected by water extraction and soil acidification. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 361-372.
45. Tichý L. 2002. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 451-453.
46. van der Maarel E. 1979. Transformation of Cover-abundance values in Phytosociology and its effects on Community Similarity. Vegetatio 39: 97-114.
47. Van Duren I. C. & Pegtel D. M. 2000. Nutrient limitations in wet, drained and rewetted fen meadows: evaluation of methods and results. Plant Soil 220: 35-47.
48. Wassen M. J., Peeters W. H. M. & Olde Venterink H. 2002. Patterns in vegetation, hydrology and nutrient availability in an undisturbed river floodplain in Poland. Plant Ecol. 165: 27-43.
49. Westhoff V. & van der Maarel E. 1973. The Braun-Blanquet Approach, pp. 617-726. In: Whittaker R. H. (ed), Ordination and Classification of Communities. Junk, The Hague.
50. Wheeler B. D. & Proctor M. C. F. 2000. Ecological gradients, subdivisions and terminology of north-west European mires. J. Ecol. 88: 187-203.
51. Wierda A., Fresco L. M. F., Grootjans A. P. & van Diggelen R. 1997: Numerical Assesment of Plant Species as Indicators of the Groundwater regime. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 707-716.
52. Zelnik I. 2005a. Meadows of the order Molinietalia Koch 1926 in South-Eastern Slovenia. Fitosociol. 14: 3-32.
53. Zelnik I. 2005b. Vegetation of the meadows from the order Molinietalia W. Koch 1926 and contact sites in Slovenia. Dissertation, University of Ljubljana (Slovenia), 196 pp.
54. Zupančič B. 1995. Klimatografija Slovenije. Količina padavin: obdobje 1961-1990. Hidrometerološki zavod Slovenije, Ljubljana.