The timing of face selectivity and attentional modulation in visual processing

Neuroscience

Volumn 152, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1130-1144

  Okazaki, Y ^a,b   Abrahamyan, A ^c   Stevens, C J ^c   Ioannides, A A ^a,b  

^a KYUSHU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b RIKEN BRAIN SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

fusiform gyrus; human; MEG; object based attention; V1

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; FACE; GENDER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FACE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REACTION TIME; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 41549149910     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.056     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abrahamyan A., Stevens C., and Ioannides A.A. The effect of emblematic hand gestures on visual attention. Aust J Psychol 57 (2005) 42
2. Allison T., Puce A., Spencer D.D., and McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. Cereb Cortex 9 (1999) 415-430
3. Awh E., Vogel E.K., and Oh S.H. Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience 139 (2006) 201-208
4. Baddeley A.D. Working memory (1986), Oxford University Press, Oxford
5. Bakar A.A., Liu L., Conci M., Elliott M.A., and Ioannides A.A. Visual field and task influence illusory figure responses. Hum Brain Mapp (2007) in press
6. Botzel K., and Grusser O.J. Electric brain potentials evoked by pictures of faces and non-faces: a search for "face-specific" EEG-potentials. Exp Brain Res 77 (1989) 349-360
7. Boutsen L., Humphreys G.W., Praamstra P., and Warbrick T. Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: an ERP study of the Thatcher illusion. Neuroimage 32 (2006) 352-367
8. Corbetta M., Miezin F.M., Dobmeyer S., Shulman G.L., and Petersen S.E. Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. Science 248 (1990) 1556-1559
9. Courtney S.M., Ungerleider L.G., Keil K., and Haxby J.V. Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory. Nature 386 (1997) 608-611
10. Curtis C.E., Rao V.Y., and D'Esposito M. Maintenance of spatial and motor codes during oculomotor delayed response tasks. J Neurosci 24 (2004) 3944-3952
11. Desimone R., and Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 18 (1995) 193-222
12. Di Russo F., Martinez A., and Hillyard S.A. Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. Cereb Cortex 13 (2003) 486-499
13. Duncan J., and Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol Rev 96 (1989) 433-458
14. Eimer M. The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. Neuroreport 11 (2000) 2319-2324
15. Ekman P., and Friesen W.V. Pictures of facial affect (1976), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA
16. Fisher N.I. Statistical analysis of circular data (1993), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
17. Gauthier I., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., and Anderson A.W. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat Neurosci 3 (2000) 191-197
18. Giesbrecht B., Woldorff M.G., Song A.W., and Mangun G.R. Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention. Neuroimage 19 (2003) 496-512
19. Hadjikhani N., and de Gelder B. Neural basis of prosopagnosia: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 16 (2002) 176-182
20. Halgren E., Raij T., Marinkovic K., Jousmaki V., and Hari R. Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. Cereb Cortex 10 (2000) 69-81
21. Hayden B.Y., and Gallant J.L. Time course of attention reveals different mechanisms for spatial and feature-based attention in area V4. Neuron 47 (2005) 637-643
22. Henson R.N., Goshen-Gottstein Y., Ganel T., Otten L.J., Quayle A., and Rugg M.D. Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. Cereb Cortex 13 (2003) 793-805
23. Hironaga N., and Ioannides A.A. Accurate co-registration for MEG reconstructions. In: Nowak H., Haueisen J., GieBler F., and Huonker R. (Eds). Proceedings of the 13th international conference on biomagnetism (2002), Verlag, Berlin 931-933
24. Ioannides A.A. Dynamic functional connectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17 (2007) 161-170
25. Ioannides A.A., Bolton J.P.R., and Clarke C.J.S. Continuous probabilistic solutions to the biomagnetic inverse problem. Inverse Problems 6 (1990) 523-542
26. Ioannides A.A., Fenwick P.B., and Liu L. Widely distributed magnetoencephalography spikes related to the planning and execution of human saccades. J Neurosci 25 (2005) 7950-7967
27. Ioannides A.A., Poghosyan V., Dammers J., and Streit M. Real-time neural activity and connectivity in healthy individuals and schizophrenia patients. Neuroimage 23 (2004) 473-482
28. Ishai A., Ungerleider L.G., Martin A., Schouten J.L., and Haxby J.V. Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96 (1999) 9379-9384
29. Itier R.J., Herdman A.T., George N., Cheyne D., and Taylor M.J. Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG. Brain Res 1115 (2006) 108-120
30. Itier R.J., and Taylor M.J. Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs. Neuroimage 15 (2002) 353-372
31. Itier R.J., and Taylor M.J. Face inversion and contrast-reversal effects across development: in contrast to the expertise theory. Dev Sci 7 (2004) 246-260
32. Itier R.J., and Taylor M.J. N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cereb Cortex 14 (2004) 132-142
33. Jacques C., and Rossion B. Electrophysiological evidence for temporal dissociation between spatial attention and sensory competition during human face processing. Cereb Cortex 17 (2007) 1055-1065
34. Jahn O., Cichocki A., Ioannides A.A., and Amari S. Identification and elimination of artifacts from MEG signals using extended independent component analysis. In: Yoshimoto T., Kotani M., Kuriki S., Karibe H., and Nakasato N. (Eds). Recent advances in biomagnetism (1999), Tohoku University Press, Sendai 224-228
35. Jeffreys D.A. A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp. Exp Brain Res 78 (1989) 193-202
36. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., and Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci 17 (1997) 4302-4311
37. Kawashima R., Satoh K., Goto R., Inoue K., Itoh M., and Fukuda H. The role of the left inferior temporal cortex for visual pattern discrimination-a PET study. Neuroreport 9 (1998) 1581-1586
38. LaBar K.S., Gitelman D.R., Parrish T.B., and Mesulam M. Neuroanatomic overlap of working memory and spatial attention networks: a functional MRI comparison within subjects. Neuroimage 10 (1999) 695-704
39. Latinus M., and Taylor M.J. Face processing stages: Impact of difficulty and the separation of effects. Brain Res 1123 (2006) 179-187
40. Lavie N., and Tsal Y. Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Percept Psychophys 56 (1994) 183-197
41. Linkenkaer-Hansen K., Palva J.M., Sams M., Hietanen J.K., Aronen H.J., and Ilmoniemi R.J. Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electroencephalography. Neurosci Lett 253 (1998) 147-150
42. Liu J., Harris A., and Kanwisher N. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study. Nat Neurosci 5 (2002) 910-916
43. Liu L., and Ioannides A.A. Spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity pattern differences between centrally and peripherally presented faces. Neuroimage 31 (2006) 1726-1740
44. Liu L., Ioannides A.A., and Streit M. Single trial analysis of neurophysiological correlates of the recognition of complex objects and facial expressions of emotion. Brain Topogr 11 (1999) 291-303
45. Luck S.J., Chelazzi L., Hillyard S.A., and Desimone R. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 77 (1997) 24-42
46. Martinez A., DiRusso F., Anllo-Vento L., Sereno M.I., Buxton R.B., and Hillyard S.A. Putting spatial attention on the map: timing and localization of stimulus selection processes in striate and extrastriate visual areas. Vision Res 41 (2001) 1437-1457
47. Mishkin M., Ungerleider L.G., and Macko K.A. Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends Neurosci 6 (1983) 414-417
48. Motter B.C. Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. J Neurophysiol 70 (1993) 909-919
49. Mouchetant-Rostaing Y., Giard M.H., Bentin S., Aguera P.E., and Pernier J. Neurophysiological correlates of face gender processing in humans. Eur J Neurosci 12 (2000) 303-310
50. Murray S.O., and Wojciulik E. Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex. Nat Neurosci 7 (2004) 70-74
51. O'Craven K.M., Downing P.E., and Kanwisher N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 401 (1999) 584-587
52. O'Craven K.M., Rosen B.R., Kwong K.K., Treisman A., and Savoy R.L. Voluntary attention modulates fMRI activity in human MT-MST. Neuron 18 (1997) 591-598
53. Poghosyan V., Shibata T., and Ioannides A.A. Effects of attention and arousal on early responses in striate cortex. Eur J Neurosci 22 (2005) 225-234
54. Rees G., Frith C.D., and Lavie N. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science 278 (1997) 1616-1619
55. Rossion B., Delvenne J.F., Debatisse D., Goffaux V., Bruyer R., Crommelinck M., and Guerit J.M. Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study. Biol Psychol 50 (1999) 173-189
56. Roth H.L., Lora A.N., and Heilman K.M. Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention. Brain 125 (2002) 2023-2035
57. Schwarzlose R.F., Baker C.I., and Kanwisher N. Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus. J Neurosci 25 (2005) 11055-11059
58. Seeck M., Michel C.M., Mainwaring N., Cosgrove R., Blume H., Ives J., Landis T., and Schomer D.L. Evidence for rapid face recognition from human scalp and intracranial electrodes. Neuroreport 8 (1997) 2749-2754
59. Streit M., Ioannides A.A., Liu L., Wolwer W., Dammers J., Gross J., Gaebel W., and Muller-Gartner H.W. Neurophysiological correlates of the recognition of facial expressions of emotion as revealed by magnetoencephalography. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 7 (1999) 481-491
60. Sugase Y., Yamane S., Ueno S., and Kawano K. Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex. Nature 400 (1999) 869-873
61. Summerfield C., Egner T., Greene M., Koechlin E., Mangels J., and Hirsch J. Predictive codes for forthcoming perception in the frontal cortex. Science 314 (2006) 1311-1314
62. Tanner Jr. W.P., and Swets J.A. A decision-making theory of visual detection. Psychol Rev 61 (1954) 401-409
63. Taylor J.G., Ioannides A.A., and Muller-Gartner H.W. Mathematical analysis of lead field expansions. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18 (1999) 151-163
64. VanRullen R., and Koch C. Competition and selection during visual processing of natural scenes and objects. J Vis 3 (2003) 75-85
65. Watanabe S., Kakigi R., Koyama S., and Kirino E. Human face perception traced by magneto- and electro-encephalography. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 8 (1999) 125-142