Haemorrhoidectomy with electrocautery or ultrashears and stapled haemorrhoidopexy

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 78, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 389-393

  Leventoǧlu, Sezai ^a   Menteş, B Bülent ^a,b   Akin, Murat ^a   Oǧuz, Mehmet ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Diathermy; Haemorrhoidectomy; Postoperative pain; Stapled haemorrhoidopexy; UltraShears

Indexed keywords

NARCOTIC AGENT; NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUTERIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; INCONTINENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; SURGICAL STAPLING; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; ELECTROCOAGULATION; FEMALE; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SURGICAL STAPLING; ULTRASONIC THERAPY;

EID: 41549146992     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04483.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Keighley MR. Haemorrhoidal disease. In : Keighley MR, Williams NS (eds). Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon. Philadelphia : WB Saunders, 1993 295 63.
2. McRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities: a meta-analysis. Dis. Colon. Rectum 1995 38 : 687 94.
3. Hosch SB, Knoefel WT, Pichlmeier U et al. Surgical treatment of piles: prospective, randomized study of Parks vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Dis. Colon. Rectum 1998 41 : 159 64.
4. Wolff BG, Culp CE. The whitehead hemorrhoidectomy: an unjustly maligned procedure. Dis. Colon. Rectum 1998 31 : 587 90.
5. Holzheimer RG. Hemorrhoidectomy: indications and risks. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2004 9 : 18 36.
6. Smith LE. Hemorrhoids. A review of current techniques and management. Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am. 1987 16 : 79 91.
7. Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG. Symptomatic hemorrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative therapy. Dis. Colon. Rectum 1992 35 : 477 81.
8. Salvati EP, Eisenstat TE. Hemorrhoidal disease. In : Zuidema GD, Condon RE (eds). Shackelford's Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 4th edn. Philadelphia : WB Saunders, 1996 330 43.
9. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In : Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna, Italy : Monduzzi Publishig Co, 1998 777 84.
10. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000 355 : 779 81.
11. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapled procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000 355 : 782 5.
12. Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A. Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2004 19 : 239 44.
13. Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I. Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis. Colon. Rectum 2003 46 : 93 9.
14. Pernice LM, Bartalucci B, Bencini L, Borri A, Catarzi S, Kröning K. Early and late (ten years) experience with circular stapler hemorrhoidectomy. Dis. Colon. Rectum 2001 44 : 836 41.
15. ® vs. electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluation. Dis. Colon. Rectum 2001 44 : 558 64.
16. ® hemorrhoidectomy: five hundred consecutive cases. Dis. Colon. Rectum 2002 45 : 354 9.
17. ® hemorrhoidectomy, bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy, and scissors excision: ligation technique. Dis. Colon. Rectum 2002 45 : 789 94.
18. Ramadan E, Vishne T, Dreznik Z. Harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy: preliminary results of a new alternative method. Tech. Coloproctol. 2002 6 : 89 92.
19. ® hemorrhoidectomy. Dis. Colon. Rectum 2001 44 : 677 9.
20. ® technique of excisional hemorrhoidectomy. Dis. Colon. Rectum 2001 44 : 845 9.
21. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis. Colon. Rectum 1993 36 : 77 97.
22. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tan M, Leong AF. Randomized controlled trial of open and closed hemorrhoidectomy. Br. J. Surg. 1997 84 : 1729 30.
23. Roe AM, Bartolo DC, Vellacott KD, Locke-Edmunds J, Mortensen NJ. Submucosal versus ligation excision haemorrhoidectomy: a comparison of anal sensation, anal sphincter manometry and postoperative pain and function. Br. J. Surg. 1987 74 : 948 51.
24. Neto JA, Quilici FA, Cordeiro F, Reis JA. Open versus semi-open hemorrhoidectomy: a random trial. Int. Surg. 1992 77 : 84 90.
25. Mikuni N, Oya M, Komatsu J, Yamana T. A prospective randomized comparison between an open hemorrhoidectomy and a semi-closed (semi-open) hemorrhoidectomy. Surg. Today 2002 32 : 40 47.
26. Mathai V, Ong BC, Ho YH. Randomized controlled trial of lateral internal sphincterotomy with hemorrhoidectomy. Br. J. Surg. 1996 83 : 380 82.
27. McCarus SD. Physiologic mechanism of the ultrasonically activated scalpel. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc. 1996 3 : 601 8.