Factors influencing sentinel lymph node identification failure in breast cancer surgery

Breast

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 167-171

  Straalman, Kristina ^a   Kristoffersen, Ulrik S ^b,c   Galatius, Hanne ^a   Lanng, Charlotte ^a  

^a Hoersholm Hospital   (Denmark)

^b International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Age; BMI; Breast cancer; Sentinel lymph node; Surgeon experience

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN TC 99M COLLOID; DISULFINE BLUE; METHYLENE BLUE; NANOCOLL TC 99M;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANAPHYLAXIS; ARTICLE; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; SURGEON; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; TUMOR VOLUME; WEIGHT GAIN;

EID: 41549128001     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kroman N.T., Lidegaard O., and Kvistgaard M.E. Breast cancer-a lifestyle disease?. Ugeskr Laeger 167 49 (2005) 4636-4641
2. Schwartz G.F., Guiliano A.E., and Veronesi U. Proceeding of the consensus conference of the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma or the breast, April 19-22, 2001, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Breast J 8 3 (2002) 124-138
3. Galatius H., Holtveg H.M., and Folsgard S.L. Anaphylactic reaction to patent blue in sentinel node biopsy. Ugeskr Laeger 165 34 (2003) 3242-3243
4. Chagpar A.B., Martin R.C., Scoggins C.R., et al. Factors predicting failure to identify a sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Surgery 138 1 (2005) 56-63
5. Chakera A.H., Friis E., Hesse U., Al-Suliman N., Zerahn B., and Hesse B. Factors of importance for scintigraphic non-visualisation of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32 3 (2005) 286-293
6. Cody III H.S., Fey J., Akhurst T., et al. Complementarity of blue dye and isotope in sentinel node localization for breast cancer: univariate and multivariate analysis of 966 procedures. Ann Surg Oncol 8 1 (2001) 13-19
7. McMasters K.M., Tuttle T.M., Carlson D.J., et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: a suitable alternative to routine axillary dissection in multi-institutional practice when optimal technique is used. J Clin Oncol 18 13 (2000) 2560-2566
8. Cox C.E., Dupont E., Whitehead G.F., et al. Age and body mass index may increase the chance of failure in sentinel lymph node biopsy for women with breast cancer. Breast J 8 2 (2002) 88-91
9. Krag D., Weaver D., Ashikaga T., Moffat F., Klimberg V.S., Shriver C., et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer-a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med 339 14 (1998) 941-946
10. 99mTc-rhenium sulphide colloid in breast cancer patients: evaluation of 1 day and 2 day protocols, and a dose-finding study. Nucl Med Commun 24 6 (2003) 663-670
11. Gruber C.J., Tschugguel W., Schneeberger C., and Huber J.C. Production and actions of estrogens. N Engl J Med 346 5 (2002) 340-352
12. Derossis A.M., Fey J.V., Cody III H.S., and Borgen P.I. Obesity influences outcome of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 197 6 (2003) 896-901
13. Goyal A., Newcombe R.G., Chhabra A., and Mansel R.E. Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer-results of the ALMANAC validation phase. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2006)
14. Cox C., White L., Allred N., et al. Survival outcomes in node-negative breast cancer patients evaluated with complete axillary node dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol (2006)
15. Morrow M., Rademaker A.W., Bethke K.P., et al. Learning sentinel node biopsy: results of a prospective randomized trial of two techniques. Surgery 126 4 (1999) 714-720
16. Hughes M., Goffman T.G., Perry R.R., and Laronga C. Obesity and lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Am J Surg 187 1 (2004) 52-57
17. Haigh P.I., Hansen N.M., Giuliano A.E., Edwards G.K., Ye W., and Glass E.C. Factors affecting sentinel node localization during preoperative breast lymphoscintigraphy. J Nucl Med 41 10 (2000) 1682-1688
18. Barnwell J.M., Arredondo M.A., Kollmorgen D., et al. Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 5 2 (1998) 126-130
19. Ahrendt G.M., Laud P., Tjoe J., et al. Does breast tumor location influence success of sentinel lymph node biopsy?. J Am Coll Surg 194 3 (2002) 278-284
20. Haigh P.I., Hansen N.M., Qi K., and Giuliano A.E. Biopsy method and excision volume do not affect success rate of subsequent sentinel lymph node dissection in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 7 1 (2000) 21-27
21. 99mTc nanocolloidal albumin. Nucl Med Commun 25 11 (2004) 1119-1124
22. Chagpar A., Martin III R.C., Chao C., et al. Validation of subareolar and periareolar injection techniques for breast sentinel lymph node biopsy. Arch Surg 139 6 (2004) 614-618
23. Classe J.M., Curtet C., Campion L., et al. Learning curve for the detection of axillary sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 29 5 (2003) 426-433
24. Hutchinson J.R., Chagpar A.B., Scoggins C.R., et al. Surgeon and community factors affecting breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy. Am J Surg 190 6 (2005) 903-906
25. Heuts E.M., van der Ent F.W., Kengen R.A., van der Pol H.A., Hulsewe K.W., and Hoofwijk A.G. Results of sentinel node biopsy not affected by previous excisional biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol 32 3 (2006) 278-281
26. Kollias J., Gill P.G., Coventry B.J., Malycha P., Chatterton B., and Farshid G. Clinical and histological factors associated with sentinel node identification in breast cancer. Aust NZ J Surg 70 7 (2000) 485-489
27. Fuhrman G.M., Gambino J., Bolton J.S., Farr G., and Jiang X. 5-year follow-up after sentinel node mapping for breast cancer demonstrates better than expected treatment outcomes. Am Surg 71 7 (2005) 564-569