Influence of mode of delivery in term breech presentation on the Apgar score and transfert in neonatal care unit. Results of the management of 568 singleton pregnancies in a level III French maternity;Influence de la voie d'accouchement dans la présentation du siège à terme sur le score d'Apgar et les transferts en néonatologie. Résultats de la prise en charge de 568 grossesses singleton dans une maternité française de niveau III

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 149-153

  Delotte, J ^a   Trastour, C ^a   Bafghi, A ^a   Boucoiran, I ^a   D'Angelo, L ^a   Bongain, A ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE DE NICE   (France)

Author keywords

Apgar score; Breech presentation; Pregnancy; Vaginal delivery

Indexed keywords

APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL CARE; NEWBORN CARE; TERM BIRTH; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; FRANCE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; VACUUM EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL;

EID: 41549127927     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hannah M., Hannah W., Hewson S., Hodnett E., Saigal S., and Willan A. Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomized multicenter trial. Lancet 356 (2000) 1375-1383
2. Krebs L., and Langhoff-Roos J. Elective cesarean delivery for term breech. Obstet Gynecol 101 (2003) 690-696
3. Hankins G., MacLennan A., Speer M., Strunk A., and Nelson K. Obstetric litigation is asphyxiating our maternity services. Obstet Gynecol 107 (2006) 1382-1385
4. Albrechtsen S., Rasmussen S., Reigstad H., Markestad T., Irgens L.M., and Dalaker K. Evaluation of a protocol for selecting fetuses in breech presentation for vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177 (1997) 586-592
5. Irion O., Hirsbrunner Almagbaly P., and Morabia A. Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section: a study of 705 singleton term breech presentations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105 (1998) 710-717
6. Sibony O., Luton D., Oury J.F., and Blot P. Six hundred and ten breech versus 12,405 cephalic deliveries at term: is there any difference in the neonatal outcome?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 107 (2003) 140-144
7. Hickok D., Gordon D., Milberg J., Williams M., and Daling J. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large retrospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166 (1992) 851-852
8. Young P., and Johanson R. The management of breech presentation at term. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 13 (2001) 589-593
9. Goffinet F., Carayol M., Foidart J.M., Alexander S., Uzan S., Subtil D., et al., PREMODA study group. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 (2006) 1002-1011
10. Bartlett D., Okun N., Byrne P., Watt J., and Piper M. Early motor development of breech and cephalic presenting infants. Obstet Gynecol 95 (2000) 425-432
11. Rosen M., Debanne S., Thompson K., and Bilenker R. Long-term neurological morbidity in breech and vertex births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151 (1985) 718-720
12. White H., Hannah M., Saigal S., Hannah W., Hewson S., Amankwah K., et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 (2004) 864-871
13. Gilbert W.M., Hicks S.M., Boe N.M., and Danielsen B. Vaginal versus cesarean delivery for breech presentation in California: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 102 (2003) 911-917
14. Macedonia C., Gherman R., and Satin A. Simulation laboratories for training in obsterics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 102 (2003) 388-392
15. Smith G.C.S., Pell J.P., and Dobbie B.S. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet 362 (2003) 1779-1784
16. Gray R., Quigley M.A., Hockley C., Kurinczuk J.J., Goldacre M., and Brocklehurst P. Caesarean delivery and risk of stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study in an English population. BJOG 114 (2007) 264-270