Does off-pump coronary surgery endanger long term survival?

Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 99-101

  Ekroth, Rolf ^a   Odén, Anders ^b   Ståhle, Elisabeth ^c   Werkö, Lars ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGINA PECTORIS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GRAFT FAILURE; HEALTH HAZARD; HEART LUNG MACHINE; HEART MUSCLE COMPLIANCE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT INDICATION;

CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; CORONARY DISEASE; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 41549122468     PISSN: 14017431     EISSN: 16512006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14017430801993198     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Ibrahim K, Vitale N, Kirkeby-Garstad I, Samstad S, Haaverstad R. Narrowing effect of off-pump CABG on the LIMALAD anastomosis: Epicardial ultrasound assessment. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2008;42:2.
2. Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Novick RJ. Evidence-Based Perioperative Clinical Outcomes Research Group. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:188-203.
3. Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Djaiani G, Rao V, Borger MA, Karkouti K, et al. Off-pump coronary artery surgery for reducing mortality and morbidity: Meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:872-82.
4. Parolari A, Alamanni F, Polvani G, Agrifoglio M, Chen YB, Kassem S, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing off-pump with on-pump coronary artery bypass graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:2121-5.
5. Lim E, Drain A, Davies W, Edmonds L, Rosengard BR. A systematic review of randomized trials comparing revascularization rate and graft patency of off-pump and conventional coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:1409-13.
6. Takagi H, Tanabashi T, Kawai N, Kato T, Umemoto T. Off-pump coronary artery bypass sacrifices graft patency: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:e2-3.
7. Hannan EL, Wu C, Smith CR, Higgins RS, Carlson RE, Culliford AT, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization. Circulation. 2007;116:1145-52.
8. Evidence based cardiology. Yusuf S, editor. Vol. 2. Impact of revsacularization procedures in chronic CAD on clinical outcomes. BMJ books: 2003. p 355.
9. Bell MR, Gersh BJ, Schaff HV, et al. Effect of completeness of revascularization on long-term outcome of patients with three-vessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation. 1992;86:446-57.
10. Synnergren M, Ekroth R, Odén A, Rexius H, Wiklund L. Incomplete revascularization reduces survival benefit of CABG: Role of off pump surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (in press).
11. Vander Salm TJ, Kip KE, Jones RH, Schaff HV, Shemin RJ, Aldea GS, et al. What constitutes optimal surgical revascularization? Answers from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:565-72.
12. van den Brand MJ, Rensing BJ, Morel MA, Foley DP, de Valk V, Breeman A, et al. The effect of completeness of revascularization on event-free survival at one year in the ARTS trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:559-64.