Productivity-quality-costs-safety: A sustained approach to competitive advantage - A systematic review of the national safety council's case studies in safety and productivity

Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 152-179

  Maudgalya, Tushyati ^a   Genaidy, Ash ^a   Shell, Richard ^a  

^a University of Cincinnati   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; INVESTMENTS; PRODUCTIVITY;

COST EFFICIENCY; OPERATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY;

SAFETY ENGINEERING;

EID: 41549120635     PISSN: 10908471     EISSN: 15206564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20106     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Aldrich, M. (1997). Safety first: Technology, labor and business in the building of American work safety: 1870-1939. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2003). National occupational employment and wage estimate, 2003. Retrieved Winter 2006 from http://www.bls.gov/oes/ current/oes_00al.htm
3. Carroll, J. S. (1998). Safety culture as an ongoing process: Culture surveys as opportunities for inquiry and change. Work & Stress.
4. Case Studies in Safety and Productivity (Vol. 1). (2001). Itasca, IL: National Safety Council Press.
5. Case Studies in Safety and Productivity (Vol. 2). (2003). Itasca, IL: National Safety Council Press.
6. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) (2001). Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
7. Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44.
8. Ecos Corporation. (2002, March). Safe companies - A practical path for operationalising sustainability. Retrieved Winter 2006 from http://www.ecoscorp.com/think/safety/safe_companies.htm
9. Franke, R. H., & Kaul, J. D. (1978). The Hawthorne experiments: First statistical interpretation. American Sociological Review, 43, 623-643.
10. Genaidy, A., & LeMasters, G. K. (2006). Epidemiological appraisal instrument (EAI). Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 7(3), 187-189.
11. Gersuny, C. (1998, May). Safety first: Technology, labor and business in the building of American work safety: 1870-1939 [book review]. Labor History. Retrieved Winter 2006 from http://www.findarticles.com/p/ articles/mi_m0348/is_n2_v39/ai_20951195
12. Institute of Management and Administration (IOMA). (2004a, March). How to make the new business case for safety (SADR: Safety director's report). Retrieved Winter 2006 from http://www.ioma.com
13. Institute of Management and Administration (IOMA). (2004b, April). How to link productivity to your safety initiatives (SADR: Safety director's report). http://www.ioma.com
14. Kuorinka, I., & Forcier, L. (1995). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A reference book for prevention. New York: Taylor & Francis.
15. Leeth, J. D., & Ruser, J. (2003, November). Safety segregation: The importance of gender and race on workplace risk [draft copy]. Retrieved Winter 2006 from http://www.iupi.edu/~econ/courses/leeth.pdf
16. Macleod, D. (1995). The ergonomics edge: Improving safety, quality and productivity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (2004, March). Does it really work?: How to evaluate safety and health changes in the workplace (NIOSH Publication No. 2004-135). Retrieved Winter 2006 from http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2004-135/
18. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1991). The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production. New York: John Wiley & Sons.