Adaptation and unsupervised learning

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Dayan, Peter ^a   Sahani, Maneesh ^a   Deback, Grégoire ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FACTOR ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL THEORIES;

UNSUPERVISED LEARNING;

EID: 41549114575     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Abbott, LF, Varela, JA, Sen, K, & Nelson, SB (1997) Synaptic depression and cortical gain control. Science 275, 220-224.
2. Atick, JJ (1992) Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing? Network: Computation in Neural Systems 3, 213-251.
3. Atick, JJ, & Redlich, AN (1990) Towards a theory of early visual processing. Neural Computation 2, 308-320.
4. Attneave, F (1954) Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review 61, 183-193.
5. Barlow, HB (1961) Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In WA Rosenblith, ed., Sensory Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Barlow, HB (1969) Pattern recognition and the responses of sensory neurones. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 156, 872-881.
7. Barlow, HB (1989) Unsupervised learning, Neural Computation, 1, 295-311.
8. Barlow, H (2001) Redundancy reduction revisited. Network 12: 241-253.
9. Campbell, FW & Maffei, L (1971) The tilt after-effect: a fresh look. Vision Research 11, 833-40.
10. Clifford, CWG, Wenderoth, P & Spehar, B. (2000) A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 261, 1705-1710.
11. Davis, PJ (1979) Circulant Matrices. New York, NY: Wiley.
12. Dayan, P & Abbott, LF (2001). Theoretical Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Diamond, ME, Huang, W & Ebner, FF (1994) Laminar comparison of somatosensory cortical plasticity. Science 265, 1885-1888.
14. Dong, DW, & Atick, JJ (1995) Temporal decorrelation: A theory of lagged and nonlagged responses in the lateral geniculate nucleus. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 6, 159-178.
15. Everitt, BS (1984) An Introduction to Latent Variable Models, London: Chapman and Hall.
16. Gibson, JJ & Radner, M (1937) Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology 20, 453-467.
17. Heeger, DJ (1992) Normalization of responses in cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience 9, 181-198.
18. Hinton, GE, Dayan, P, Frey, BJ, & Neal, RM (1995) The wake-sleep algorithm for unsupervised neural networks. Science 268, 1158-1160.
19. Hinton, GE & Sejnowski, TJ (1999) Unsupervised Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Jolliffe, IT (1986) Principal Component Analysis, New York: Springer.
21. Jöreskog, KG (1967) Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis, Psychometrika, 32, 443-482.
22. Jöreskog, KG (1969) A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis, Psychometrika, 34, 183-202.
23. Kohonen, T & Oja, E (1976) Fast adaptive formation of orthogonalizing filters and associative memory in recurrent networks of neuron-like elements. Biological Cybernetics 21, 85-95.
24. Leopold, DA, O'Toole, AJ, Vetter, T & Blanz, V (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 4: 89-94.
25. Li, Z & Atick, JJ (1994a) Efficient stereo coding in the multiscale representation. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 5, 157-174.
26. Linsker, R (1988) Self-organization in a perceptual network, Computer, 21, 105-128.
27. Maguire G, Hamasaki D.I. (1994) The retinal dopamine network alters the adaptational properties of retinal ganglion cells in the cat Journal of Neurophysiology, 72, 730-741.
28. McCormick, DA (1990) Membrane properties and neurotransmitter actions. In GM Shepherd, ed., The Synaptic Organization of the Brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Neal, RM & Dayan, P (1997). Factor Analysis using delta-rule wake-sleep learning. Neural Computation, 9, 1781-1803.
30. Neisser, U (1967) Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts.
31. Olshausen, BA, & Field, DJ (1996) Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381, 607-609.
32. Rao, RPN, & Ballard, DH (1997) Dynamic model of visual recognition predicts neural response properties in the visual cortex. Neural Computation 9, 721-763.
33. Regan, D & Beverley, KI (1985) Postadaptation orientation discrimination. JOSA A, 2, 147-155.
34. Roweis, S & Ghahramani, Z (1999) A unifying review of linear gaussian models. Neural Computation 11, 305-345.
35. Rubin, DB & Thayer, DT (1982) EM algorithms for ML factor analysis, Psychometrika 47, 69-76.
36. Ruderman DL & Bialek W (1994) Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods. Physical Review Letters 73, 814-817.
37. Schwartz, O & Simoncelli, EP (2001) Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control. Nature Neuroscience 4, 819-825.
38. Shapley, R & Enroth-Cugell, C (1984) Visual adaptation and retinal gain control. Progress in Retinal Research 3, 263-346.
39. Tipping, ME & Bishop, CM (1999) Mixtures of probabilistic principal component analyzers. Neural Computation 11, 443-482.
40. van Hateren, JH (1992) A theory of maximizing sensory information. Biological Cybernetics 68, 23-29.
41. Wainwright, MJ (1999) Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission. Vision Research 39, 3960-3974.
42. Weiler R & Wagner HJ (1984) Light-dependent change of cone-horizontal cell interactions in carp retina. Brain Resesarch 298, 1-9.