Continent urinary diversion (Mitrofanoff principle). Physical mechanisms and urodynamic explanation of continence;Dérivation urinaire de Mitrofanoff. Mécanismes physiques et explication urodynamique de la continence

Progres en Urologie

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 120-124

  Chabchoub, K ^a   Ketata, H ^b   Fakhfakh, H ^b   Bahloul, A ^b   Mhiri, M N ^b  

^a Centre Hospitalier de LENS   (France)

^b HABIB BOURGUIBA HOSPITAL   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Conduit; Continent urinary diversion; Urodynamic

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER; BLADDER DISEASE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE; URINARY DIVERSION; URINE INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS;

ADULT; HUMANS; PRESSURE; URINARY BLADDER; URINARY BLADDER DISEASES; URINARY DIVERSION; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 41549101966     PISSN: 11667087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2007.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Buzelin J.M. Biomécanique. Urodynamique : Bas Appareil Urinaire (1984), Masson 41-48
2. Burger R., Wammack R., Fisch M., Muller S.C., and Hohenfellner R. The appendix as a continence mechanism. Eur Urol 22 (1992) 255-262
3. Watson H.S., Bauer S.B., Peters C.A., Mandell J., Colodny A.H., Atala A., et al. Comparative urodynamics of appendiceal and ureteral Mitrofanoff conduits in children. J Urol 154 (1995) 878-882
4. Hinman Jr. F. Functional classification of conduits for continent diversion. J Urol 144 (1990) 27-30
5. Monti P.R., and Carvalho J.R. Tubulisation transversale de segments intestinaux : un conduit cathétérisable alternatif au procédé de Mitrofanoff. Prog Urol 11 (2001) 382-384
6. Woodhouse C.R.J. The Mitrofanoff thechnique for a continent stoma. Bladder Reconstruction and Continent Urinary Diversion. LR king, ar stone, gd webster. 2nd ed. (1991), Mosby Year Book 299-307
7. Quek M.L., and Ginsberg D.A. Long-term urodynamics follow-up of bladder augmentation for neurogenic bladder. J Urol 169 (2003) 195-198
8. Meria P., Audry G., and Brueziere J.J. Cystoplasties in children. Ann Urol 26 (1992) 246-255
9. Hinman Jr. F. Selection of intestinal segments for bladder substitution: physical and physiological characteristics. J Urol 139 (1988) 519-523
10. Kock N.G. The development of the continent ileal reservoir (Koch pouch) and its application in patients requiring urinary diversion. Bladder Reconstruction and Continent Urinary diversion. LR king, ar stone, gd webster. 2nd ed. (1991), Mosby Year Book 247-271
11. Mcdougal W.S. Mechanics and neurophysiology of intestinal segments as bowel substitutes: an editorial comment. J Urol 138 (1987) 1438-1439
12. Schmidbauer C.P., Chiang H., and Raz S. The impact of detubularization on ileal reservoirs. J Urol 138 (1987) 1440-1445
13. Laguna M.P., Brenninkmeier M., Belon J.A., Marrero R., Wijkstra H., de la Rosette J., et al. Long-term functional and urodynamic results of 50 patients receiving a modified sigmoid neobladder created with a short distal segment. J Urol 174 (2005) 963-967
14. Burkhard F.C., Kessler T.M., Springer J., and Studer U.E. Early and late urodynamic assessment of ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes combined with an afferent tubular segment. J Urol 175 (2006) 2155-2160
15. Santucci R.A., Park C.H., Mayo M.E., and Lange P.H. Continence and urodynamic parameters of continent urinary reservoirs: comparison of gastric, ileal, ileocolic, right colon, and sigmoid segments. Urology 54 (1999) 252-257
16. Chabchoub K., Fakhfakh H., Sahnoun A., Bahloul A., and Mhiri M.-N. Mitrofanoff continent urinary diversions: the opinion of 57 patients. Prog Urol 16 (2006) 578-583
17. Schrier B.P., Laguna M.P., van der Pal F., Isorna S., and Witjes J.A. Comparison of orthotopic sigmoid and ileal neobladders: continence and urodynamic parameters. Eur Uol 47 (2005) 679-685