Plant systems biology comes of age

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 165-171

  Yuan, Joshua S ^a   Galbraith, David W ^b   Dai, Susie Y ^c   Griffin, Patrick ^c   Stewart Jr , C Neal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PLANTS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 41549094923     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.02.003     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Trewavas A. A brief history of systems biology. 'Every object that biology studies is a system of systems.' Francois Jacob (1974). Plant Cell 18 (2006) 2420-2430
2. Kirschner M.W. The meaning of systems biology. Cell 121 (2005) 503-504
3. Schauer N., and Fernie A.R. Plant metabolomics: towards biological function and mechanism. Trends Plant Sci. 11 (2006) 508-516
4. Uhrig J.F. Protein interaction networks in plants. Planta 224 (2006) 771-781
5. Glinski M., and Weckwerth W. The role of mass spectrometry in plant systems biology. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 25 (2006) 173-214
6. Ahmadian A., et al. Pyrosequencing: history, biochemistry and future. Clin. Chim. Acta 363 (2006) 83-94
7. Galbraith D.W. DNA microarray analyses in higher plants. OMICS 10 (2006) 455-473
8. Kris R.M., et al. High-throughput, high-sensitivity analysis of gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 144 (2007) 1256-1266
9. Boone C., et al. Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8 (2007) 437-449
10. Katagiri F. Attacking complex problems with the power of systems biology. Plant Physiol. 132 (2003) 417-419
11. Sweetlove L.J., et al. Predictive metabolic engineering: a goal for systems biology. Plant Physiol. 132 (2003) 420-425
12. Girke T., et al. Towards a modeling infrastructure for studying plant cells. Plant Physiol. 132 (2003) 410-414
13. Nemhauser J.L., et al. Building integrated models of plant growth and development. Plant Physiol. 132 (2003) 436-439
14. Thum K.E., et al. Light- and carbon-signaling pathways. Modeling circuits of interactions. Plant Physiol. 132 (2003) 440-452
15. Alonso J.M., and Ecker J.R. Moving forward in reverse: genetic technologies to enable genome-wide phenomic screens in Arabidopsis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7 (2006) 524-536
16. Alvarez-Buylla E.R., et al. Gene regulatory network models for plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10 (2007) 83-91
17. Belostotsky D.A., and Rose A.B. Plant gene expression in the age of systems biology: integrating transcriptional and post-transcriptional events. Trends Plant Sci. 10 (2005) 347-353
18. Palme K. Towards plant systems biology - novel mathematical approaches to enable quantitative analysis of growth processes. New Phytol. 171 (2006) 443-444
19. Sweetlove L.J., and Fernie A.R. Regulation of metabolic networks: understanding metabolic complexity in the systems biology era. New Phytol. 168 (2005) 9-23
20. Ueda H.R. Systems biology flowering in the plant clock field. Mol Syst Biol 2 (2006) 60
21. Hirai M.Y., et al. Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics for understanding of global responses to nutritional stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004) 10205-10210
22. Nikiforova V.J., et al. Integrative gene-metabolite network with implemented causality deciphers informational fluxes of sulphur stress response. J. Exp. Bot. 56 (2005) 1887-1896
23. Hirai M.Y., et al. Elucidation of gene-to-gene and metabolite-to-gene networks in Arabidopsis by integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 25590-25595
24. Tohge T., et al. Functional genomics by integrated analysis of metabolome and transcriptome of Arabidopsis plants over-expressing an MYB transcription factor. Plant J. 42 (2005) 218-235
25. Hirai M.Y., et al. Omics-based identification of Arabidopsis Myb transcription factors regulating aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007) 6478-6483
26. Goossens A., et al. A functional genomics approach toward the understanding of secondary metabolism in plant cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 8595-8600
27. Zulak K.G., et al. Gene transcript and metabolite profiling of elicitor-induced opium poppy cell cultures reveals the coordinate regulation of primary and secondary metabolism. Planta 225 (2007) 1085-1106
28. Carrari F., et al. Integrated analysis of metabolite and transcript levels reveals the metabolic shifts that underlie tomato fruit development and highlight regulatory aspects of metabolic network behavior. Plant Physiol. 142 (2006) 1380-1396
29. Rischer H., et al. Gene-to-metabolite networks for terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006) 5614-5619
30. Wei H., et al. Transcriptional coordination of the metabolic network in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 142 (2006) 762-774
31. Usadel B., et al. Extension of the visualization tool MapMan to allow statistical analysis of arrays, display of corresponding genes, and comparison with known responses. Plant Physiol. 138 (2005) 1195-1204
32. Blasing O.E., et al. Sugars and circadian regulation make major contributions to the global regulation of diurnal gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17 (2005) 3257-3281
33. Scheible W.R., et al. Genome-wide reprogramming of primary and secondary metabolism, protein synthesis, cellular growth processes, and the regulatory infrastructure of Arabidopsis in response to nitrogen. Plant Physiol. 136 (2004) 2483-2499
34. Gibon Y., et al. Integration of metabolite with transcript and enzyme activity profiling during diurnal cycles in Arabidopsis rosettes. Genome Biol. 7 (2006) R76
35. Hesse H., and Hoefgen R. On the way to understand biological complexity in plants: S-nutrition as a case study for systems biology. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 11 (2006) 37-56
36. Hesse H., and Hoefgen R. On the way to understand biological complexity in plants: S-nutrition as a case study for systems biology. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 11 (2006) 37-55
37. Tong A.H.Y., et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294 (2001) 2364-2368
38. Tong A.H.Y., et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303 (2004) 808-813
39. Lehner B., et al. Systematic mapping of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans identifies common modifiers of diverse signaling pathways. Nat. Genet. 38 (2006) 896-903
40. To J.P.C., et al. Type-A Arabidopsis response regulators are partially redundant negative regulators of cytokinin signaling. Plant Cell 16 (2004) 658-671
41. Riefler M., et al. Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor mutants reveal functions in shoot growth, leaf senescence, seed size, germination, root development, and cytokinin metabolism. Plant Cell 18 (2006) 40-54
42. Fields S., and Song O.K. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature 340 (1989) 245-246
43. Ito T., et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 (2001) 4569-4574
44. Uetz P., et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403 (2000) 623-627
45. Giot L., et al. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 302 (2003) 1727-1736
46. Li S., et al. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 303 (2004) 540-543
47. Ho Y., et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415 (2002) 180-183
48. Bevan M., and Walsh S. The Arabidopsis genome: a foundation for plant research. Genome Res. 15 (2005) 1632-1642
49. Matthews L.R., et al. Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or 'interologs'. Genome Res. 11 (2001) 2120-2126
50. Geisler-Lee J., et al. A predicted interactome for Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 145 (2007) 317-329
51. Yu H., et al. Annotation transfer between genomes: protein-protein interologs and protein-DNA regulogs. Genome Res. 14 (2004) 1107-1118
52. de Folter S., et al. Comprehensive interaction map of the Arabidopsis MADS box transcription factors. Plant Cell 17 (2005) 1424-1433
53. Zimmermann I.M., et al. Comprehensive identification of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB transcription factors interacting with R/B-like BHLH proteins. Plant J. 40 (2004) 22-34
54. Tardif G., et al. Interaction network of proteins associated with abiotic stress response and development in wheat. Plant Mol. Biol. 63 (2007) 703-718
55. Popescu S.C., et al. Differential binding of calmodulin-related proteins to their targets revealed through high-density Arabidopsis protein microarrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007) 4730-4735
56. You X., et al. Intracellular protein interaction mapping with FRET hybrids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006) 18458-18463
57. Gilchrist M., et al. Systems biology approaches identify ATF3 as a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor 4. Nature 441 (2006) 173-178
58. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., and Shinozaki K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57 (2006) 781-803
59. Serna L., and Martin C. Trichomes: different regulatory networks lead to convergent structures. Trends Plant Sci. 11 (2006) 274-280
60. Wang D., et al. A genomic approach to identify regulatory nodes in the transcriptional network of systemic acquired resistance in plants. PLoS Pathogens 2 (2006) 1042-1050
61. Davuluri R.V., et al. AGRIS: Arabidopsis Gene Regulatory Information Server, an information resource of Arabidopsis cis-regulatory elements and transcription factors. BMC Bioinformatics 4 (2003) 25
62. Palaniswamy S.K., et al. AGRIS and AtRegNet. A platform to link cis-regulatory elements and transcription factors into regulatory networks. Plant Physiol. 140 (2006) 818-829
63. Li S., et al. Predicting essential components of signal transduction networks: a dynamic model of guard cell abscisic acid signaling. PLoS Biol. 4 (2006) 1732-1748
64. Espinosa-soto C., et al. A gene regulatory network model for cell-fate determination during Arabidopsis thaliana flower development that is robust and recovers experimental gene expression profiles. Plant Cell 16 (2004) 2923-2939
65. Zeilinger M.N., et al. A novel computational model of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis that incorporates PRR7 and PRR9. Mol. Sys. Biol. 2 (2006) 58
66. Locke J.C.W., et al. Experimental validation of a predicted feedback loop in the multi-oscillator clock of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Sys. Biol. 2 (2006) 59
67. Cooper B., et al. A network of rice genes associated with stress response and seed development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 4945-4950
68. Hammer G., et al. Models for navigating biological complexity in breeding improved crop plants. Trends Plant Sci. 11 (2006) 587-593
69. Struik P.C., et al. Complex quality traits: now time to model. Trends Plant Sci. 10 (2005) 513-516
70. Yin X., et al. Role of crop physiology in predicting gene-to-phenotype relationships. Trends Plant Sci. 9 (2004) 426-432
71. Zhao W., et al. A non-stationary model for functional mapping of complex traits. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 2469-2477
72. Wu R., and Lin M. Functional mapping - how to map and study the genetic architecture of dynamic complex traits. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7 (2006) 229-237
73. Reymond M., et al. Combining quantitative trait loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyze the genetic variability of the responses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiol. 131 (2003) 664-675
74. Schauer N., et al. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat. Biotechnol. 24 (2006) 447-454
75. Keurentjes J.J.B., et al. The genetics of plant metabolism. Nat. Genet. 38 (2006) 842-849
76. Gutierrez R.A., et al. Systems biology for the virtual plant. Plant Physiol. 138 (2005) 550-554
77. Lescourret F., and Genard M. A virtual peach fruit model simulating changes in fruit quality during the final stage of fruit growth. Tree Physiol. 25 (2005) 1303-1315
78. Tokimatsu T., et al. KaPPA-view: a web-based analysis tool for integration of transcript and metabolite data on plant metabolic pathway maps. Plant Physiol. 138 (2005) 1289-1300
79. Bornholdt S. Less is more in modeling large genetic networks. Science 310 (2005) 449-451
80. Di Ventura B., et al. From in vivo to in silico biology and back. Nature 443 (2006) 527-533
81. Hall R.D. Plant metabolomics: from holistic hope, to hype, to hot topic. New Phytol. 169 (2006) 453-468
82. Salt D.E. Update on plant ionomics. Plant Physiol. 136 (2004) 2451-2456
83. Sekiyama Y., and Kikuchi J. Towards dynamic metabolic network measurements by multi-dimensional NMR-based fluxomics. Phytochemistry 68 (2007) 2320-2329
84. Turnbull J.E., and Field R.A. Emerging glycomics technologies. Nat. Chem. Biol. 3 (2007) 74-77