Imagining a non-biological machine as a legal person

AI and Society

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 523-537

  Calverley, David J ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTENTIONALITY; MENTAL STATE;

EID: 41549090922     PISSN: 09515666     EISSN: 14355655     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00146-007-0092-7     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adams W (2004) Machine consciousness: Plausible idea or semantic distortion? J Conscious Stud 11(9):46-56
2. Angel L (1989) How to build a conscious machine. Westview Press, Boulder
3. Arbib M, Fellous J (2004) Emotions: From brain to robot. Trends Cogn Sci 8(12):554
4. Austin J (1832) The province of jurisprudence determined, 1955 edn. Weidenfeld, Nicholson, London
5. Ayer AJ (1963) The concept of a person. St. Martin's Press, New York
6. Boden M (1996) Autonomy and artificiality. In: Boden M (ed) The philosophy of artificiallife. Oxford University Press, Oxford
7. Brentano F (1924-1973) Psychology from an empirical standpoint (Rancurello AC, Terrell DB, McAlister L Transs.). Routledge, Kegan Paul, London
8. Clark A (2003) Artificial intelligence and the many faces of reason. In: Stich S, Warfield T (eds) The Blackwell guide to philosophy of mind. Blackwell, Malden, MA
9. Covigaru A, Lindsay R (1991) Deterministic autonomous systems. AI Mag Fall, pp 110-117
10. Damasio A (1994) Descartes' error. Harper Collins, New York
11. Donaldson T (1982) Corporations and morality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
12. Floridi L, Sanders JW (2004) On the morality of artificial agents. Mind Mach 3(14):349
13. Frankfurt H (1988a) Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. In: Frankfurt H (ed) The importance of what we care about. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Original work published 1969)
14. Frankfurt H (1988b) Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. In: Frankfurt H (ed) The importance of what we care about. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Original work published 1971)
15. Frankfurt H (1999) Autonomy, necessity and love. In: Frankfurt H (ed) Necessity, volition and love. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Original work published 1994)
16. French P (1984) Collective and corporate responsibility. Columbia University Press, New York
17. Gray JC (1909-1921) The nature and sources of the law. Macmillan, New York
18. Green L (1988) The authority of the state. Clarendon Press, Oxford
19. Heckman C (1999) Liability for autonomous agent design. Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. Kluwer, The Netherlands
20. Herman B (2002) Bootstrapping. In: Buss S, Overton L (eds) Contours of agency. MIT, Cambridge, MA
21. Hexmoor H, Castelfranchi C, Falcone R (2003) A prospectus on agent autonomy. In: Hexmoor H (ed) Agent autonomy. Kluwer, Boston
22. Holland O (2003) Machine consciousness. Special issue of J Conscious Stud 10(4/5)
23. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (eds) (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
24. Kane R (1996) The significance of free will. Oxford University Press, New York
25. Kelsen H (1967) Pure theory of law (Knight M, Trans.). University of California Press, Berkeley
26. Knobe J (2003) Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation. Philos Psychol 16(2):309-324
27. Lakoff G (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
28. Malle B, Knobe J (1997) The folk concept of intentionality. J Exp Soc Psychol 33:101-121
29. Malle B, Nelson S (2003) Judging mens rea: The tension between folk concepts and legal concepts of intentionality. Behav Sci Law 21:563-580
30. Morse S (2004) New neuroscience, old problems. Neuroscience and the Law. Dana Press, New York
31. Morse S (2004a) Reason, results, and criminal responsibility. Univ Ill Law Rev 2004(2):363-444
32. Nadelhoffer T (2005) Skill, luck, control, and intentional action. Philos Psychol 18(3):341-352
33. Note (1987) The personification of the business corporation in American law. Univ Chic Law Rev 54:1441
34. Pollock J (2006) Thinking about acting: Logical foundations for rational decision making. Oxford University Press, New York
35. Raz J (1975) Practical reason and norms. Hutchinson, London
36. Restatement (Third) of Agency (2006) American Law Institute, St. Paul, MN
37. Rivaud M (1992) Comment: Toward a general theory of constitutional personhood: A theory of constitutional personhood for transgenic humanoid species. UCLA Law Rev 39:1425
38. Rorty A (1976) The identity of persons. University of California Press, Berkeley
39. Schauer F (2004) The limited domain of law. Va Law Rev 90:1909-1955
40. Searle J (1980) Minds, brains and programs. Behav Brain Sci 3:417
41. Searle J (1999) Mind, language and Society. Basic Books, New York
42. Sloman A, Croucher M (1981) Why robots will have emotions. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI, Vancouver
43. Solum L (1992) Legal personhood for artificial intelligences. North Carol Law Rev 70:1231
44. Strawson P (1959) Individuals. Methuen, London
45. van Inwagen P (1983) An essay on free will. Oxford University Press, Oxford
46. Wallach W (2004) Artificial morality: Bounded rationality, bounded morality and emotions. In: Smit I, Lasker G (eds) Cognitive, emotive and ethical aspects of decision making in humans and artificial intelligence, vol I. IIAS, Windsor, Canada
47. Werhane P (1985) Persons, rights and corporations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
48. Wolff RP (1998) In defense of anarchism. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles (Original work published 1970)