Running training after stroke: A single-subject report

Physical Therapy

Volumn 88, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 511-522

  Miller, Ellen W ^a   Combs, Stephanie A ^a   Fish, Caryn ^b   Bense, Brooke ^c   Owens, Amanda ^d   Burch, Andrea ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INDIANAPOLIS   (United States)

^b is an assistant professor of nursing at Bethel College   (United States)

^c Pain Center   (United States)

^d Podiatry   (United States)

^e Chandler Regional Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; ENDURANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION CARE; RUNNING; STROKE; TREADMILL EXERCISE;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCULOSKELETAL EQUILIBRIUM; PHYSICAL ENDURANCE; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RUNNING; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 41449109391     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20050240     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. The Internet Stroke Center. Washington University School of Medicine. 2006. Available at: http://www.strokecenter.org. Accessed January 11, 2006.
2. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics - 2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2006;113:e85-e151.
3. Dugan SA, Bhat KP. Biomechanics and analysis of running gait. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 2005;16:603-621.
4. Novacheck TF. The biomechanics of running. Gait Posture. 1998;7:77-95.
5. Levangie PK, Norkin CC. Joint Structure and Function: A Comprehensive Analysis. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: FA Davis Co; 2001.
6. Williams G, Goldie P. Validity of motor tasks for predicting running ability in acquired brain injury. Brain Injury. 2001;15:831-841.
7. Gardner M, Holden M, Leikauskas J, Richard R. Partial body weight support with treadmill locomotion to improve gait after incomplete spinal cord injury: a single-subject experimental design. Phys Ther. 1998;78:361-373.
8. Ang ET, Wong PT, Moochhala S, Ng YK. Neuroprotection associated with running: is it a result of increased endogenous neurotrophic factors? Neuroscience. 2003;118:335-345.
9. Zhao X, Aronowski J, Shi-Jie L, et al. Wheel-running modestly promotes functional recovery after a unilateral cortical lesion in rats. Behav Neurol. 2005;16:41-49.
10. Mudge S, Rochester L. Neurophysiological rationale of treadmill training: evaluating evidence for practice. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy. 2001;29:6-15.
11. Basso DM, Behrman AL, Harkema SJ. Recovery of walking after central nervous system insult: basic research in the control of locomotion as a foundation for developing rehabilitation strategies. Neuroreport. 2000;24:47-54.
12. Behrman AL, Harkema SJ. Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: a series of case studies. Phys Ther. 2000;80:688-700.
13. Barbeau H. Locomotor training in neurorehabilitation: emerging rehabilitation concepts. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:3-11.
14. Sullivan KJ, Knowlton BJ, Dobjin BH. Step training with body weight support: effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:683-691.
15. Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C, Ruckriem S. Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2002;33:553-558.
16. Lamontagne A, Fung J. Faster is better: implications for speed-intensive gait training after stroke. Stroke. 2004;35:2543-2548.
17. Bayona NA, Bitensky J, Salter K, Teasell R. The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12:58-65.
18. Trueblood PR. Partial body weight treadmill training in persons with chronic stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2001;16:141-153.
19. Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitinsky N, Mayo N. A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke. 1998;29:1122-1128.
20. Hesse S, Bertelt C, Schaffrin A, et al. Restoration of gait in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients by treadmill training with partial body-weight support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:1087-1093.
21. Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke MT, et al. Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 1995;26:976-981.
22. Miller EW. Body weight supported treadmill and overground training in a patient post cerebrovascular accident. NeuroRehabilitation. 2001;16:155-163.
23. Danielsson A, Sunnerhagen KS. Oxygen consumption during treadmill walking with and without body weight support in patients with hemiparesis after stroke and in healthy subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:953-957.
24. Hesse S, Helm B, Krajnik J, et al. Treadmill training with partial body weight support: influence of body weight release on the gait of hemiparetic patients. J Neurol Rehabil. 1997;11:15-20.
25. Moseley AM, Stark A, Cameron ID, Pollock A. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library. Issue 4. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2003.
26. Ottenbacher, KJ. Evaluating Clinical Change. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1986.
27. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
28. Bohannon RW, Larkin PA, Cook AC, et al. Decrease in timed balance test scores with aging. Phys Ther. 1984;64:1067-1070.
29. Boenig DD. Evaluation of a clinical method of gait analysis. Phys Ther. 1977;57:795-798.
30. Bohannon RW. Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry during a single session of strength assessment. Phys Ther. 1986;66:206-209.
31. Kolber MJ, Cleland JA. Strength testing using hand-held dynamometry. Phys Ther Rev. 2005;10:99-112.
32. Bohannon RW. Knee extension torque in stroke patients: comparison of measurements obtained with a hand-held and a Cybex dynamometer. Physiother Can. 1990;42:284-287.
33. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:111-117.
34. Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, et al. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:75-82.
35. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, et al. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0: evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131-2140.
36. Edwards B, O'Connell B. Internal consistency and validity of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0) and SIS-16 in an Australian sample. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:1127-1135.
37. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 6th ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000:104.
38. Latash ML, Anson JG. What are "normal movements" in atypical populations? Behav Brain Sci. 1996;19:55-106.
39. Beneke R, Hutler M. The effect of training on running economy and performance in recreational athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:1794-1799.
40. Paavolainen L, Hakkinen K, Hamalainen I, et al. Explosive-strength training improves 5-km running time by improving running economv and muscle power. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86:1527-1533.
41. Winter DA, Sienko SE. Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. J Biomech. 1988;21:361-367.
42. Bohannon RW. Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by handheld dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:26-32.
43. Eng JJ, Chu KS, Kim CM, et al. A community-based group exercise program for persons with chronic stroke. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1271-1278.
44. Leroux A. Exercise training to improve motor performance in chronic stroke: effects of a community based exercise program. Int J Rehabil Res. 2005;28:17-23.
45. Ivey EM, Macko RF, Ryan AS, Hafer-Macko CE. Cardiovascular health and fitness after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12:1-16.
46. Rimmer JH, Wang E. Aerobic exercise training in stroke survivors. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12:17-30.