The trust responsibility and limited sovereignty: What can environmental justice groups Learn from Indian Nations?

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 354-362

  Ranco, Darren J ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Community based monitoring; Environmental justice groups; Environmental racism; Native Americans; Tribal sovereignty

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; RACISM; SOVEREIGNTY; STANDARD (REGULATION);

ASIA; EURASIA; INDIA; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 41449107333     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920701329710     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Alfred, T. (1999) Peace, power, and righteousness: An indigenous manifesto, Oxford University Press, New York
2. Barsh, R. (1986) The nature and spirit of North American political systems. Am. Indian Q., 10:3, pp. 181-198.
3. Barsh, R. and Henderson, J. Y. (1980) The road: Indian tribes and political liberty, University of California Press, Berkeley
4. Boldt, M. and Long, J. A. (1984) Tribal traditions and European-Western political ideologies: The dilemma of Canada's Native Indians. Can. J. Polit. Sci., 17:3, pp. 537-553.
5. Chambers, R. (1975) Judicial enforcement of the federal trust responsibility to Indians. Stanford Law Rev., 27:5, pp. 1213-1248.
6. Cole, L. and Foster, S. (2000) From the ground up: Environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement, New York University Press, New York
7. Deloria, V. and Lytle, C. (1984) The nations within, University of Texas Press, Austin
8. Dussias, A. (1999) Asserting a traditional environmental ethic: Recent developments in environmental regulation involving Native American tribes. N. Engl. Law J., 33:1, pp. 653-689.
9. Galloway, W. (1995) Tribal water quality standards under the Clean Water Act: Protecting traditional cultural uses. Washington Law Rev., 77:1, pp. 177-202.
10. Gauna, E. (1998) The environmental justice misfit: Public participation and the paradigm paradox. Stanford Law J., 17:1, pp. 3-88.
11. Goldtooth, T. B. K. (1995) Environmental justice: Issues, policies, and solutions, pp. 138-148. Island Press, Washington, DC
12. Graham, J. (1992) Public Hearing re: Proposed Chapter 584: Surface Water Toxics Control Program and Interim Statewide Criteria for Dioxin, State of Maine Department of Environmental Protection, Augusta
13. Kickingbird, K. (1977) Indian sovereignty, Institute for the Development of Indian Law, Washington, DC
14. Kuehn, R. (1996) The environmental justice implications of quantitative risk assessment. Illinois Law Rev., 38:1, pp. 103-178.
15. Lakind, J. and Rifkin, E. (1990) Current method for setting dioxin limits in water requires re-examinatian. Environ. Sci. Technol., 24:7, pp. 960-981.
16. Morris, G. (1992) The state of Native America, pp. 55-86. South End Press, Boston
17. Nanda, V. (1981) Self-determination under international law: Validity of claims to secede. Case Western J. Int. Law, 13:1, pp. 42-96.
18. Nelson, R. and Sheley, J. (1985) American Indian policy in the twentieth century, pp. 177-196. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman
19. O'Brien, S. (1986) The government-government and trust relationships: Conflicts and inconsistencies. Am. Indian Culture Res. J., 10:4, pp. 57-80.
20. (1993) Comments on initial draft permit for Lincoln pulp and paper, Department of Natural Resources, Indian Island, ME
21. (1996) Joint letter with Bureau of Indian Affairs regarding trust responsibility and fish consumption, Department of Natural Resources, Indian Island, ME
22. Percival, R., Schroeder, C., Miller, A. and Leape, J. P. (1996) Environmental regulation: Law, science, and policy, Little, Brown, New York
23. Pommersheim, F. (1995) Braid of feathers, University of California Press, Berkeley
24. Ranco, D. J. (2000) Environmental risk and politics in eastern Maine: The Penobscot nation and the environmental protection agency, PhD dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
25. Ranco, D. J. and Suagee, D. (2007) Tribal sovereignty and the problem of difference in environmental regulation: Observations on 'measured separatism' in Indian Country. Antipode, 39:4, pp. 691-707.
26. Sagoff, M. (1988) The economy of the earth: Philosophy, law, and the environment, Orbis, Mary Knoll, NY
27. Shrader-Frechette, K. (1995) Evaluating the expertise of experts. Risk Environ. Health Safety, 6:2, pp. 115-126.
28. (1984) EPA policy for the administration of environmental programs on Indian reservations, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC
29. (1991) Federal, tribal, and state roles in the protection and regulation of reservation environments, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC
30. (1994) Memorandum of actions for strengthening EPA's tribal operations, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC
31. (1997) Joint public notice of the Lincoln pulp and paper mill national discharge elimination system permit, Office of Ecosystem Protection, EPA-New England, Boston
32. (1997) Response to public comments, Office of Ecosystem Protection, EPA-New England, Boston
33. (1998) Treatment of tribes in the same manner as states/Program approval matrix, U.S. EPA Office of Water, Washington, DC
34. (2001) Memorandum re-affirming 1984 Indian Policy, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC
35. (2006) Indian tribal approvals for the water quality standards program, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC
36. (1976) Covenant on civil and political rights, United Nations, New York
37. (2007) United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples, United Nations, New York
38. Weaver, J. (1996) Defending Mother Earth: Native American perspectives on environmental justice, Orbis Books, Maryknoll, NY
39. Webster, T. (1990) Why dioxin and other halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons are bad news. J. Pestic. Reform, 9:1, pp. 5-11.
40. Wilkinson, C. F. (1987) American Indians, time, and the law, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
41. Williams, B. and Matheny, A. (1995) Democracy, dialogue, and environmental disputes: The contested languages of social regulation, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
42. Wood, M. (1994) Indian land and the promise of native sovereignty: The trust doctrine revisited. Utah Law Rev., 4, pp. 1471-1569.