Exploring the relationship between feature and perceptual visual spaces

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 770-784

  Rorissa, Abebe ^a   Clough, Paul ^b   Deselaers, Thomas ^c  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SPACE; LOWER-DIMENSIONAL FEATURE; PERCEPTUAL VISUAL SPACES;

IMAGE RECOGNITION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; VISUALIZATION;

FEATURE EXTRACTION;

EID: 41449105185     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20792     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Barnard, K., & Forsyth, D. (2001). Learning the semantics of words and pictures. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Vision (Vol. II) (pp. 408-415). Vancouver, Canada: IEEE.
2. Bonnet, E., & Van de Peer, Y. (2002). Zt: A software tool for simple and partial Mantel tests. Journal of Statistical software, 7(10), 1-12.
3. Cai, D., He, X., Li, Z., Ma, W-Y., & Wen, J-R. (2004). Hierarchical clustering of WWW image search results using visual, textual and link information. Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 952-959.
4. Chang, M., Leggett, J. J., Furuta, R., Kerne, A., Williams, J. P., Burns, S. A. et al.(2004). Collection understanding. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEECS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 334-342), Tucson, AZ, USA. New York, NY: ACM Press.
5. Chen, C., Gagaudakis, G., & Rosin, P. (2000). Content-based image visualisation. Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Information Visualisation (pp. 13-18). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
6. Combs, T.T.A., & Bederson, B.B. (1999). Does zooming improve image browsing? Proceedings of Digital Library (pp. 130-137). New York: ACM.
7. Coxon, A. P. M. (1999). Sorting data: Collection and analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
9. Datta, R., Li, J., & Wang, J.Z. (2005). Content-based image retrieval: approaches and trends of the new age. In H. Zhang, J. Smith, & Qi Tian (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGMM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval (pp. 253-262). New York: ACM.
10. Del Bimbo, A. (1999). Visual Information Retrieval. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Deselaers, T., Hegerath, A., Keysers, D., & Ney, H. (2006). Sparse patchhistograms for object classification in cluttered images. Pattern Recognition, Proceedings of the 26th DAGM Symposium, Berlin, Germany. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4174, 202-211.
12. Deselaers, T., Keysers, D., & Ney, H. (2004). FIRE - Flexible image retrieval engine: ImageCLEF 2004 evaluation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3491, 688-698.
13. Deselaers, T., Keysers, D., & Ney, H. (2005). Discriminative training for object recognition using image patches. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Vol. 2, pp. 157-162), San Diego, CA: IEEE.
14. Deselaers, T., Keysers, D., & Ney, H. (in press). Features for image retrieval: An experimental comparison. Information Retrieval.
15. Deselaers, T., Müller, H., Clough, P., Ney, H., & Lehmann, T. (2007). ImageCLEF 2005 medical automatic image annotation task. International Journal of Computer Vision, 74, 51-58.
16. Dori, D. (2000). Cognitive image retrieval. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (pp. 1042-1045). Barcelona, Spain.
17. Dorkó, G. (2006). Selection of discriminative regions and local descriptors for generic object class recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, France.
18. Dunn-Rankin, P., Knezek, G., Wallace, S., & Zhang, S. (2002). Scaling methods (2nd prepublication ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Enser, P.G.B. (2000). Visual image retrieval: Seeking the alliance of conceptbased and content-based paradigms. Journal of Information Science, 26(4), 199-210.
20. Faloutsos, C., Barber, R., Flickner, M., Niblack, W., Petkovic, D., & Equitz, W. (1994). Efficient and effective querying by image content. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 3(3/4), 231-262.
21. Fauqueur, J., & Boujemaa, N. (2003). Logical query composition from local visual feature thesaurus. Third International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing, September 22-24, 2003. Retrieved August 14, 2007, from http://www.eng.cam.ac.uk/~jf330/papers/fauqueur_CBMI03.pdf
22. Goldstone, R.L. (1999). Similarity. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, (pp. 757-759). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Goodrum, A.A. (2001). Multidimensional scaling of video surrogates. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 174-182.
24. Greisdorf, H., & O'Connor, B.C. (2002a). What do users see? Exploring the cognitive nature of functional image retrieval. In E.G. Toms (Ed.), Proceedings of the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (pp. 383-390). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
25. Greisdorf, H., & O'Connor, B.C. (2002b). Modeling what users see when they look at images: A cognitive viewpoint. Journal of Documentation, 58(1), 6-29.
26. Gu, Z.Q., Duncan, C.N., Renshaw, E., Mugglestone, M.A., Cowan, C.F.N., & Grant, P. M. (1989). Comparison of techniques for measuring cloud texture in remotely sensed satellite meteorological image data. Radar and Signal Processing, 136(5), 236-248.
27. Gupta, A., Santini, S., & Jain, R. (1997). In search of information in visual media. Communications of the ACM, 40(12), 35-42.
28. Haberäcker, P. (1995). Praxis der digitalen bildverarbeitung und mustererkennung (Practice of digital image processing and pattern recognition). München, Wien: Carl Hanser Verlag.
29. Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, B., & Dinstein, I. (1973). Texture features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3(6), 610-621.
30. Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1985). Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 2, 193-218.
31. Ingwersen, P. (1992). Information retrieval interaction. London: Taylor Graham.
32. Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: elements of cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, 52(1), 3-50.
33. Janecek, P., & Pu, P. (2004). Opportunistic search with semantic fisheye views. EFPL Technical Report: IC/2004/42.
34. Jörgensen, C. (1998). Attributes of images in describing tasks. Information Processing & Management, 34(2/3), 161-174.
35. Jörgensen, C., Jaimes, A., Benitez, A.B., & Chang, S. F. (2001). A conceptual framework and empirical research for classifying visual descriptors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(11), 933-947.
36. Jörgensen, C., & Jörgensen, P. (2005). Image querying by image professionals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(12), 1346-1359.
37. Keysers, D., Deselaers, T., Gollan, C., & Ney, H. (2007). Deformation models for image recognition, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
38. Laine-Hernandez, M., & Westman, S. (2006). Image semantics in the description and categorization of journalistic photographs. In A. Grove & J. Stefl-Mabry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://www.asis.org/Conferences/AM06/proceedings/papers/48/48_paper.html
39. Legendre, P., & Legendre, L. (1998). Numerical ecology (2nd English ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
40. Lew, M.S., Sebe, N., Djeraba, C., & Jain, R. (2006). Content-based multimedia information retrieval: State of the art and challenges. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 2, 1-19.
41. Li, B., Chang, E., & Wu, Y. (2003). Discovery of a perceptual distance function for measuring image similarity. Multimedia Systems, 8(6), 512-522.
42. Liu, H., Xie, X., Tang, X., Li, Z., & Ma, W. (2004). Effective browsing of Web image search results. Proceedings of MIR (pp. 84-90). New York, USA.
43. Lyman, P., & Varian, H.R. (2003). How much information 2003? Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/research/projects/ how-much-info-2003
44. Manly, B. F. J. (2005), Multivariate statistical methods: A primer (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
45. Mantel, N. (1967). The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research, 27, 209-220.
46. Melara, R.D. (1992). The concept of perceptual similarity: From psychophysics to cognitive psychology. In D. Algom, (Ed.), Psychophysical Approaches to Cognition, (pp. 303-388). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
47. Müller, H, Müller, W., Squire, D.M., Marchand-Maillet, S, & Pun, T. (2000). Learning features weights from user behavior in content-based image retrieval. In S. Simoff & O. Zaiane (Eds.), ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Workshop on Multimedia Data Mining MDM/KDD2000). Boston, MA, USA.
48. Neumann, D., & Gegenfurtner, K.R. (2006). Image retrieval and perceptual similarity. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 3, 31-47.
49. Newby, G.B. (2001). Cognitive space and information space. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(12), 1026-1048.
50. O'Connor, B.C., O'Connor, M.K., & Abbas, J.M. (1999). User reactions as access mechanism: An exploration based on captions for images. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(8), 681-697.
51. O'Connor, B.C., & Wyatt, R.B. (2004). Photo provocations: Thinking in, with, and about photographs. Lanham, Md.; Oxford: Scarecrow Press.
52. Park, G., Baek, Y., & Lee, H-K. (2005). Re-ranking algorithm using postretrieval clustering for content-based image retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 41(2), 177-194.
53. Puzicha, J., Rubner, Y., Tomasi, C., & Buhmann, J. (1999). Empirical evaluation of dissimilarity measures for color and texture. Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (Vol. 2, pp. 1165-1173). Corfu, Greece: IEEE.
54. Qin, J. (2000). Semantic similarities between a keyword database and a controlled vocabulary database: An investigation in the antibiotic resistance literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(3), 166-180.
55. Rodden, K., Basalaj, W., Sinclair, D., & Wood, K. (1999). Evaluating a visualisation of image similarity as a tool for image browsing. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualisation (pp. 36-43). San Francisco, CA: IEEE.
56. Rodden, K., Basalaj, W., Sinclair, D., & Wood, K. (2000). A comparison of measures for visualising image similarity. Proceedings of Challenges of Image Retrieval. Retrieved March 6, 2007, from http://www.rodden.org/kerry/cir2000.pdf
57. Rodden, K., Basalaj, W., Sinclair, D., & Wood, K. (2001). Does organisation by similarity assist image browsing? ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 190-197). Seattle, WA: ACM.
58. Rogowitz, B. E., Frese, T., Smith, J. R., Bouman, C A., & Kalin, E. (1998). Perceptual image similarity experiments. In B. E. Rogowitz & T. N. Pappas (Eds.), Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III, Proceedings of the SPIE (pp. 576-590). San Jose, CA.
59. Rorissa, A., & Iyer, H. (in press). Theories of cognition and image categorization: What category labels reveal about basic level theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.
60. Rubner, Y. (1999). Perceptual metrics for image database navigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
61. Salton, G., Wong, A., & Yang, CS. (1975). A vector space model for automatic indexing. Communications of the ACM, 18(11), 613-620.
62. Santini, S., & Jain, R. (1999). Similarity measures. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(9), 871-883.
63. Siggelkow, S., Schael, M., & Burkhardt, H. (2001). SIMBA - search IMages by appearance. Pattern Recognition, Proceedings of the 23rd DAGM Symposium, Munich, Germany. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2191, 9-17.
64. Smeulders, A.W.M., Worring, M., Santini, S., Gupta, A., & Jain, R. (2000). Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(12), 1349-1380.
65. Smith, J.R., & Chang, S-F. (1996). Tools and techniques for color image retrieval. Proceedings of the Storage & Retrieval for Image and Video Databases IV (Vol. 2670, pp. 426-437). San Jose, CA: IS&T/SPIE.
66. Squire, D., & Pun, T. (1998). Assessing agreement between human and machine clusterings of image databases. Pattern Recognition, 31(12), 1905-1919.
67. Stan, D., & Sethi, I. K. (2003). eID: A system for exploration of image databases. Information Processing and Management, 39, 335-361.
68. Stevens, S.S. (1975). Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York: Wiley.
69. Swain, M.J., & Ballard, D.H. (1991). Color indexing. International Journal of Computer Vision, 7(1), 11-32.
70. Tamura, H., Mori, S., & Yamawaki, T. (1978). Textural features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 8(6), 460-472.
71. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84(4), 327-352.
72. Tversky, A., & Gati, I. (1978). Studies of similarity. In E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 79-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
73. Vasconcelos, N, & Lippman, A. (2000). A unifying view of image similarity. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (pp. 1038-1041). Barcelona, Spain.
74. Yavlinsky, A., Pickering, M.J., Heesch, D., & Rüger, S. (2004). A comparative Study of Evidence Combination Strategies. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (pp. 1040-1043.). Montreal, Canada.
75. Zachary, J. (2000). An information theoretic approach to content based image retrieval. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
76. Zachary, J., Iyengar, S.S., & Barhen, J. (2001). Content based image retrieval and information theory: A general approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 840-852.
77. Zhang, J., & Korfhage, R.R. (1999a). A distance and angle similarity measure method. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 772-778.
78. Zhang, J., & Korfhage, R.R. (1999b). DARE: Distance and angle retrieval environment: A tale of the two measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 779-787.
79. Zhang, J., & Rasmussen, E.M. (2001). Developing a new similarity measure from two different perspectives. Information Processing & Management, 37(2), 279-294.
80. Zhu, B., & Chen, H. (2000). Validating a geographical image retrieval system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 625-634.