Theory and finite element computation of cyclic martensitic phase transformation at finite strain

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-31

  Stein, Erwin ^a   Sagar, Gautam ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Finite strains; Martensitic phase transformation; Quasi convexification; Shape memory alloys

Indexed keywords

DEFORMATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; KINEMATICS; SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT; SINGLE CRYSTALS; STRAIN; STRESS-STRAIN CURVES;

FINITE STRAIN; MONOCRYSTAL; QUASI-CONVEXIFICATION;

MARTENSITIC TRANSFORMATIONS;

DEFORMATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; KINEMATICS; MARTENSITIC TRANSFORMATIONS; SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT; SINGLE CRYSTALS; STRAIN; STRESS-STRAIN CURVES;

EID: 41449099781     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2148     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Govindjee S, Miehe C. A multi-variant martensitic phase transformation model: formulation and numerical implementation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001; 191(3-5):215-238.
2. Stein E, Zwickert O. Theory and finite element computations of a unified cyclic phase transformation model for monocrystalline materials at small strain. Computational Mechanics 2007; 40(3):429-445.
3. Govindjee S, Mielke A, Hall GJ. The free energy of mixing for n-variant martensitic phase transformations using quasi-convex analysis. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 2003; 51(4):I-XXVI.
4. Patoor E, Eberhardt A, Berveiller M. Micromechanical modelling of superelasticity in shape memory alloys. Journal de Physique 1995; IV(C8-5):277-292.
5. Ball JM, James RD. Fine phase mixtures and minimizers of energy. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 1987; 100(1): 13-52.
6. Ball JM, James RD. Proposed experimental tests of a theory of fine microstructure and the two wall problem. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 1992; 338:389-450.
7. Müller S. Variational model for microstructure and phase transitions (Lecture Notes No. 2, Max Planck Institut für Math, Leipzig, 1998). In Calculus of Variations and Geometric Evolution Problems, Hildebrandt S et al. (eds). Lecture Notes in Mathematica, vol. 1713. 1999; 85-210.
8. Srinivas AR, Rajgopal KR, Armstrong KR. A phenomenological model of twinning based on dual reference structure. Acta Materialia 1998; 46(338):1235-1248.
9. Pitteri M, Zanzotto G. Continuum Models for Phase Transitions and Twinning of Crystals. Chapman & Hall: Boca Raton, FL, 2003.
10. Bhattacharya K, Kohn RV. Elastic energy minimization and the recoverable strains of polycrystalline shape-memory materials. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 1997; 139:99-180.
11. Lu ZK, weng GJ. Martensitic transformation and stress-strain relations of shape-memory alloys. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1997; 45(11):1905-1928.
12. Marketz F, Fischer FD. Modelling the mechanical behavior of shape memory alloys under variant coalescence. Computational Materials Science 1996; 5(1):210-226.
13. Thamburaja P, Anand L. Polycrystalline shape memory materials: effect of crystallographic texture. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 2001; 49:709-737.
14. Bhattacharya K. Microstructure of Martensite: Why it Forms and How it Gives Rise to the Shape-memory Effect. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2003.
15. Falk F. Model free energy, mechanics, and thermodynamics of shape memory alloys. Acta Metallurgica 1980; 28:1773-1780.
16. Falk F. Ginzburg-Landau theory of static domain walls in shape memory alloys. Zeitschrift für Physik B: Condensed Matter 1983; 2:61-77.
17. Falk F. Driven domain walls in shape-memory alloys. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 1987; 20: 2501-2509.
18. Falk F. Pseudoelastic stress-strain curves of polycrystalline shape-memory alloys calculated from single crystal data. International Journal of Engineering Science 1989; 27:277-284.
19. Krumhansl J. Landau models for structural phase transitions: are soft models needed? Solid State Communications 1992; 84:251-254.
20. Lindgrad P. Theory, modeling of martensitic transformation. Journal de Physique IV 1991; C4:3-12.
21. Abeyaratne R, Kim S. Cyclic effects in shape-memory alloys: a one-dimensional continuum model. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1997; 34:3273-3289.
22. Abeyaratne R, Kim S, Knowels J. A one-dimensional continuum model for shape memory alloys. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1994; 31:2229-2249.
23. Abeyaratne R, Knowels J. On the driving traction acting on a surface of strain discontinuity in a continuum. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1990; 38:345-360.
24. Abeyaratne R, Knowels J. A continuum model of thermoelastic solid capable of undergoing phase transitions. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1993; 41:541-571.
25. Sadjapour A, Bhattacharya K. A micromechanical inspired constitutive model for shape-memory alloys: the one-dimensional case. Smart Material and Structures 2006, preprint.
26. Patoor E, Eberhardt A, Berveiller M. Thermomechanical behavior of shape memory alloys. Archives of Mechanics 1988; 40:755-794.
27. Huang M, Brinson LC. A multivariant model for single crystal shape memory alloys behavior. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1998; 46:1379-1409.
28. Siredey N, Patoor E, Berveiller M, Eberhardt A. Constitutive equations for polycrystalline thermoelastic shape memory alloys. Part I: intergranular interactions and behavior of the grain. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1999; 36:4289-4315.
29. Entemeyer D, Patoor E, Eberhardt A, Berveiller M. Micromechanical modelling of the superelasticity behavior of materials undergoing thermoelastic phase transition. Journal de Physique 1995; IV(C8-5):233-238.
30. Goo B, Lexcellent C. Micromechanics-based modeling of two-way memory effect of a single crystalline shape-memory alloys. Acta Materilia 1997; 45:727-737.
31. Lexcellent C, Goo B, Sun Q, Bernardini J. Characterization, thermomechanical behavior and micromechanical-based constitutive model of shape memory Cu-Zn-Al single crystal. Acta Materilia 1996; 44:3773-3780.
32. Vivet A, Lexcellent C. Micromechanical modeling for tension-compression pseudoelastic behavior of AuCd single crystal. The European Physical Journal: Applied Physics 1998; 4:125-132.
33. Boyd J, Lagoudas D. A thermodynamical constitutive model for the shape-memory materials. Part I. The monolithic shape-memory alloy. International Journal of Plasticity 1996; 12:805-842.
34. Boyd J, Lagoudas D. A thermodynamical constitutive model for the shape-memory materials. Part II. The SMA composite materials. International Journal of Plasticity 1996; 12:843-873.
35. Bo Z, Lagoudas D. Thermodynamical modeling of polycrystalline SMAs under cyclic loading. Part I: theoretical derivations. International Journal of Engineering Science 1999; 37:1089-1140.
36. Bo Z, Lagoudas D. Thermodynamical modeling of polycrystalline SMAs under cyclic loading. Part III: evolution of plastic strain and two-way shape memory effect. International Journal of Engineering Science 1999; 37: 1175-1203.
37. Bo Z, Lagoudas D. Thermodynamical modeling of polycrystalline SMAs under cyclic loading. Part IV: modeling of minor hysteresis loops. International Journal of Engineering Science 1999; 37:1205-1249.
38. Bo Z, Lagoudas D. Thermodynamical modeling of polycrystalline SMAs under cyclic loading. Part II: material characterization and experimental results for a stable transformation cycle. International Journal of Engineering Science 1999; 37:1141-1173.
39. Jung Y, Papadopoulos P, Ritchie RO. Constitutive modeling and numerical simulation of multivariant phase transition in superelastic shape-memory alloys. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2004; 60:429-460.
40. Auricchio F. A robust integration algorithm for a finite-strain shape-memory-alloy superelastic model. International Journal of Plasticity 2001; 17:971-990.
41. Auricchio F, Taylor R, Lubliner J. Shape memory alloys: macromodelling and numerical simulations of superelastic behavior. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1997; 146:281-312.
42. Roubicek T, Kruzik M. Mesoscopic model of microstructure evolution in shape memory alloys, its numerical analysis and computer implementation. GAMM Mitteilungen 2006; 29(2):192-214.
43. Helm D. Numerical simulation of martensitic phase transitions in shape memory alloys using an improved integration algorithm. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2007; 69:1997-2035.
44. Helm D. Thermomechanics of martensitic phase transitions in shape memory alloys I. Constitutive theories for small and large deformations. Journal of Mechanics and Structure 2007; 2(1):87-112.
45. Helm D, Haupt P. Shape memory behavior: modeling within continuum thermomechanics. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2003; 40:827-849.
46. Auricchio F, Taylor R. Shape memory alloys: modelling and numerical simulations of the finite strain superelastic behavior. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1997; 143:175-194.
47. Soto Y, Kobayashi S, Tanaka K. Pseudoelasticity, shape memory affect associated with stress-induced martensitic transformation: a thermomechanical approach. Japanese Aerospace Science and Technology 1985; 28:150-160.
48. Tanaka K. A thermomechanical sketch of shape memory effect: one dimensional tensile behavior. Res Mechanica 1986; 18:251-263.
49. L-models of pseudoelasticity and their specification for some shape memory solids. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids 1994; 13:21-50.
50. Achenbach M, Müller I. A new form of the coherency energy in pseudoelasticity. Meccanica 1995; 30:467-474.
51. Zhang X, Rogers C, Liang C. Modeling of two-way shape memory effect. Philosophical Magazine A 1992; 65: 1199-1215.
52. Trochu F, Qian Y. Nonlinear finite element simulation of superelastic shape-memory alloy parts. Computers and Structures 1997; 62:799-810.
53. Souza A, Mamiya E, Zouain N. Three-dimensional model for solids undergoing stress-induced phase transformations. European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids 1998; 17:789-806.
54. Levitas VI, Preston DL. Three-dimensional Landau theory for multivariant stress-induces martensitic phase transformations. I. Austenaite ↔ Martensite. Physical Review B 2002; 66:1-9.
55. Levitas VI, Preston DL. Three-dimensional Landau theory for multivariant stress-induces martensitic phase transformations. I. Muttivariant phase transformation and stress space analysis. Physical Review B 2002; 66: 1-14.
56. Idesman AV, Levitas VI, Preston DI, Cho JY. Finite element simulations of martensitic phase transitions and microstructures based on a strain softening model. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2005; 53: 495-523.
57. Idesman AV, Levitas VI. Stein E. Elastoplastic materials with martensitic phase transition and twinning at finite strains: numerical solution with the finite element method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1999; 173:71-98.
58. Levitas VI, Idesman AV, Stein E. Shape memory alloys: micromechanical modeling and numerical analysis of structure. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 2001; 10(12):983-996.
59. Levitas VI. Phase transition in inelastic materials at finite strain: a local description. Journal de Physique, Colloque Cl Supplement 1996; III-IV(6):55-94.
60. Christ D, Reese S. On the necessity of modeling SMA in range of large deformations. Proceedings of the GAMM, Berlin 2006; 206-211.
61. Levitas VI. Thermomechanical theory of martensite phase transformations in inelastic materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1998; 35(9-10):889-940.
62. Hall GJ, Govindjee S. Application of the relaxed free energy of mixing to problems in shape memory alloy simulation. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 2002; 13(12):773-782.
63. Simo JC, Hughes TJR. Computational Inelasticity (1st edn). Springer: New York, 1998.
64. Kohn RV. The relaxation of a double-wall problem. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics 1991; 3:193-236.
65. Murat F, Tartar L. Personal communication to R. V. Kohn, 1989, see also cf. Kohn RV. The relaxation of a double-wall problem. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics 1991; 3:193-236.
66. Tartar L. H-measures a new approach for studying homogenization, oscillations, and concentration effect in partial differential equations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A 1990; 115:193-230.
67. Smyshlyaev VP, Willis JR. On the relaxation of a three-well energy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, vol. 455, 1999; 779-814.
68. Xiangyang Z, Qingping S, Shouwen Y. A non-invariant plane model for the interface in CuAlNi single crystal shape memory alloys. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 2000; 48:2163-2182.
69. Simo JC. A framework of finite strain elastoplasticity based on maximum plastic dissipation and the multiplicative decomposition: Part 1. Continuum formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 66:199-219.
70. Sagar G, Stein E. Implementation of a non-linear elastic material model with a free energy function in Abaqus 6.4 via UMAT. 18. Deutschsprachige ABAQUS Benutzerkonferenz 2006; 2.12:15.
71. de Bore R, Schröder J. Tensor Calculus for Engineers with Applications to Continuum and Computational Mechanics (1st edn). Springer: Berlin, 2007.