Adiabatic information transport in the presence of decoherence

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2008, Pages

  Kamleitner, I ^a   Cresser, J ^a   Twamley, J ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHERENT LIGHT; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MARKOV PROCESSES; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; QUANTUM COMPUTERS; READOUT SYSTEMS;

ADIABATIC INFORMATION TRANSPORT; DECOHERENCE; INFORMATION READOUTS;

OPTICAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 41449098183     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.032331     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. N. V. Vitanov, T. Halfmann, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. ARPLAP 0066-426X 10.1146/annurev.physchem.52.1.763 52, 763 (2001).
2. H. Goto and K. Ichimura, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.053410 74, 053410 (2006).
3. A. D. Greentree, J. H. Cole, A. R. Hamilton, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.235317 70, 235317 (2004).
4. K. Eckert, M. Lewenstein, R. CorbalÃn, G. Birkl, W. Ertmer, and J. Mompart, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.023606 70, 023606 (2004).
5. U. Hohenester, J. Fabian, and F. Troiani, Opt. Commun. OPCOB8 0030-4018 10.1016/j.optcom.2006.01.064 264, 426 (2006).
6. D. Petrosyan and P. Lambropoulos, Opt. Commun. OPCOB8 0030-4018 10.1016/j.optcom.2005.12.082 264, 419 (2006).
7. J. Siewert, T. Brandes, and G. Falci, Opt. Commun. OPCOB8 0030-4018 10.1016/j.optcom.2005.12.083 264, 435 (2006).
8. S. Longhi, G. Della Valle, M. Ornigotti, and P. Laporta, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.201101 76, 201101 (R) (2007).
9. L. C. L. Hollenberg, A. D. Greentree, A. G. Fowler, and C. J. Wellard, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.045311 74, 045311 (2006).
10. P. A. Ivanov, N. V. Vitanov, and K. Bergmann, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.063409 70, 063409 (2004).
11. P. A. Ivanov, N. V. Vitanov, and K. Bergmann, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.053412 72, 053412 (2005).
12. E. Joos and H. D. Zeh, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter ZPCMDN 0722-3277 10.1007/BF01725541 59, 223 (1985).
13. M. Borhani, V. N. Golovach, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.155311 73, 155311 (2006).
14. K. Hornberger, e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0612118v2.
15. P. Busch, M. Grabowski, and P. J. Lahti, Operational Quantum Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995).
16. J. D. Cresser, S. M. Barnett, J. Jeffers, and D. T. Pegg, Opt. Commun. OPCOB8 0030-4018 10.1016/j.optcom.2006.02.061 264, 352 (2006).
17. C. M. Caves and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.36.5543 36, 5543 (1987).
18. A possible internal Hamiltonian HTLS does not influence the QD rail if [HTLS, Hint] =0, because it can be removed by a unitary operation acting on the TLS-Hilbert space only.
19. I. Kamleitner, J. D. Cresser, and B. C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.044103 70, 044103 (2004).
20. This is usually justified in systems described by a Markovian master equation.
21. That is for small measurement rates R N and/or for weak measurements, i.e., small α a.
22. A Hamiltonian H= HA + HTLS + Hint with [HTLS, Hint] =0 always allows such a block diagonal form.
23. N. V. Vitanov, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.2295 58, 2295 (1998).
24. L. P. Yatsenko, S. GuÃrin, and H. R. Jauslin, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.043407 65, 043407 (2002).
25. Nonadiabatic corrections scale with exp (âcT | Îμ0 â Îμj |) for some constant c (see, e.g.,).
26. T. A. Laine and S. Stenholm, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2501 53, 2501 (1996).