A new species of Hypsiboas from the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae)

Copeia

Volumn , Issue 1, 2008, Pages 179-190

  Antunes, André Pinassi ^a   Faivovich, Julian ^a,b,c   Haddad, Célio F B ^a  

^a Laboratório de Herpetologia   (Brazil)

^b MUSEO ARGENTINO DE CIENCIAS NATURALES BERNARDINO RIVADAVIA   (Argentina)

^c DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIAN; CONSERVATION; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; LARVA; MORPHOLOGY; NEW SPECIES; PHYLOGENETICS; TAXONOMY; VOCALIZATION;

ATLANTIC FOREST; SOUTH AMERICA;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; HYLIDAE;

EID: 41449096967     PISSN: 00458511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1643/CH-06-163     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ab'Sáber, A. 2003. Os Domínios de Natureza no Brasil: Potencialidades Paisagísticas. Ateliê Editorial, São Paulo, Brasil.
2. Altig, R. 1970. A key to the tadpoles of the continental United States and Canada. Herpetologica 26:180-297.
3. Breder, C. M. 1946. Amphibians and reptiles of the Rio Chucunaque drainage, Darien, Panama, with notes on their life histories and habits. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 86:375-436.
4. Bremer, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
5. Bueno, S. 1982. Vocabulário Tupi-Guarani - Português. Brasilivros Editora e Distribuidora, Goiânia, Brasil.
6. Caramaschi, U., and C. A. G. Cruz. 2000. Duas novas espécies de Hyla Laurenti, 1768 do Estado de Goiás, Brasil (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Boletim do Museu Nacional, Nova Série Zoologia 422:1-12.
7. Carnaval, A. C. O. Q., and O. L. Peixoto. 2004. A new species of Hyla from Northeastern Brazil (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Herpetologica 60:387-395.
8. Cascudo, L. C. 1954. Dicionário do Folclore Brasileiro. Coleção Terra Brasilis, Ediouro, Rio do Janeiro, Brasil.
9. Chacon-Ortiz, A., A. Diaz De Pascual, and F. Godoy. 2004. Aspectos reproductivos y desarrollo larval de Hyla pugnax (Anura: Hylidae) en el piedemonte andino de Venezuela. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias 28:391-402.
10. Charif, R. A., C. W. Clark, and K. M. Fristrup. 2004. Raven 1.2 User's Manual. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.
11. De Laet, J. 2005. Parsimony and the problem of inapplicables in sequence data, p. 81-116. In: Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics. V. A. Albert (ed.). Oxford University Press, New York.
12. Duellman, W. E. 2001. The Hylid Frogs of Middle America. Society of the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles/Natural History Museum of the University of Kansas, Ithaca, New York.
13. Duellman, W. E., I. De La Riva, and R. C. Wild. 1997. Frogs of the Hyla armata and Hyla pulchella groups in the Andes of South America, with definitions and analyses of phylogenetic relationships of Andean groups of Hyla. Scientific Papers Natural History Museum 3:1-41.
14. Faivovich, J. 1996. La larva de Hyla semiguttata A. Lutz, 1925 (Anura, Hylidae). Cuadernos de Herpetologia 9:61-67.
15. Faivovich, J., P. C. A. Garcia, F. Ananias, L. Lanari, N. G. Basso, and W. C. Wheeler. 2004. A molecular perspective on the phylogeny of the Hyla pulchella species group (Anura, Hylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32:938-950.
16. Faivovich, J., C. F. B. Haddad, P. C. A. Garcia, D. R. Frost, J. A. Campbell, and W. C. Wheeler. 2005. Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revisions. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 294:1-240.
17. Farris, J. S. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis, p. 7-36. In: Advances in Cladistics: Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the Willi Hennig Society 2. N. I. Platnick and V. A. Funk (eds.). Columbia University Press, New York.
18. Farris, J. S., V. A. Albert, M. Källersjo, D. Lipscomb, and A. G. Kluge. 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12:99-124.
19. Garcia, P. C. A., J. Faivovich, and C. F. B. Haddad. 2007. Redescription of Hypsiboas semiguttatus, with the description of a new species of the Hypsiboas pulchellus group. Copeia 2007:933-951.
20. Garcia, P. C. A., G. Vinciprova, and C. F. B. Haddad. 2001. Vocalização, girino, distribuição geográfica e novos comentários sobre Hyla marginata Boulenger, 1887 (Anura, Hylidae, Hylinae). Boletim do Museu Nacional, Nova Série Zoologia 460:1-19.
21. Garcia, P. C. A., G. Vinciprova, and C. F. B. Haddad. 2003. The taxonomic status of Hyla pulchella joaquini (Anura: Hylidae) with description of its tadpole and vocalization. Herpetologica 59:350-363.
22. Goloboff, P. A. 2003. Parsimony, likelihood, and simplicity. Cladistics 19:91-103.
23. Goloboff, P. A., and J. S. Farris. 2001. Methods for quick consensus estimation. Cladistics 17:S26-S34.
24. Goloboff, P. A., and D. Pol. 2005. Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetics, p. 148-159. In: Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics. V. A. Albert (ed.). Oxford University Press, New York.
25. Gosner, K. L. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183-190.
26. Hall, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41:95-98.
27. Heyer, W. R., A. S. Rand, C. A. G. Cruz, O. L. Peixoto, and C. E. Nelson. 1990. Frogs of Boracéia. Arquivos de Zoologia 31:231-410.
28. Kwet, A., and M. Di-Bernardo. 1999. Pró-Mata - Anfíbios. Amphibien. Amphibians. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
29. Lutz, A. 1925. Batraciens du Brésil, II. Comptes Rendus de la Société de Biologie 93:211-214.
30. Lutz, B. 1973. Brazilian Species of Hyla. University of Texas Press, Austin.
31. McDiarmid, R. W., and R. Altig. 1999. Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
32. Myers, C. W., and W. E. Duellman. 1982. A new species of Hyla from Cerro Colorado, and other tree frog records and geographical notes from Western Panama. American Museum Novitates 2752:1-32.
33. Noble, G. K. 1927. The value of life history data in the study of evolution of the Amphibia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 30:31-128.
34. Nokhbatolfoghahai, M., and J. R. Downie. 2005. Larval cement gland of frogs: comparative development and morphology. Journal of Morphology 263:270-283.
35. Savage, J. M., and W. R. Heyer. 1967. Variation and distribution in the tree-frog genus Phyllomedusa in Costa Rica, Central America. Beiträge zur Neotropical Fauna 5:111-131.
36. Viadana, A. G. A. 2002. Teoria dos Refúgios Aplicada ao Estado de São Paulo. Edição do Autor. Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brasil.
37. Wheeler, W. C. 1996. Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics? Cladistics 12:1-9.
38. Wheeler, W. C. 2002. Optimization alignment: down, up, error, and improvements, p. 55-69. In: Techniques in Molecular Systematics and Evolution. R. De Salle, G. Giribet, and W. C. Wheeler (eds.). Birkhaüser Verlag, Bassel.
39. Wheeler, W. C. 2003. Iterative pass optimization of sequence data. Cladistics 19:254-260.