Longitudinal proxy measurements in multiple sclerosis: Patient-proxy agreement on the impact of MS on daily life over a period of two years

BMC Neurology

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  van der Linden, Femke A H ^a   Kragt, Jolijn J ^a   van Bon, Margarethe ^a   Klein, Martin ^a   Thompson, Alan J ^b   van der Ploeg, Henk M ^a   Polman, Chris H ^a   Uitdehaag, Bernard M J ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CUSTODY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS IMPACT SCALE; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VALIDATION STUDY; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HOSPITALIZATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROXY; RESEARCH DESIGN; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 41449091890     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712377     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-8-2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Guyatt GH Feeny DH Patrick DL Measuring health-related quality of life Ann Intern Med 1993, 118:622-629. 8452328
2. Hobart J Lamping D Fitzpatrick R Riazi A Thompson A The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): A new patient-based outcome measure Brain 2001, 124:962-973. 10.1093/brain/124.5.962 11335698
3. Riazi A Hobart JC Lamping DL Fitzpatrick R Thompson AJ Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): Reliability and validity in hospital based samples J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002, 73:701-704. 10.1136/ jnnp.73.6.701 12438473
4. Thompson AJ Hobart JC Multiple sclerosis: Assessment of disability and disability scales J Neurol 1998, 245:189-196. 10.1007/s004150050204 9591219
5. Rao SM Leo GJ Bernardin L Unverzagt F Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction Neurology 1991, 41:685-691. 2027484
6. Amato MP Zipoli V Portaccio E Multiple sclerosis-related cognitive changes: A review of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies J Neurol Sci 2006, 245:41-46. 10.1016/j.jns.2005.08.019 16643953
7. Huijbregts SC Kalkers NF de Sonneville LM de Groot V Reuling IE Polman CH Differences in cognitive impairment of relapsing remitting, secondary, and primary progressive MS Neurology 2004, 63:335-339. 15277630
8. Sadovnick AD Remick RA Allen J Swartz E Yee IM Eisen K Depression and multiple sclerosis Neurology 1996, 46:628-632. 8618657
9. Korostil M Feinstein A Anxiety disorders and their clinical correlates in multiple sclerosis patients Mult Scler 2007, 13:67-72. 10.1177/ 1352458506071161 17294613
10. Sprangers MA Aaronson NK The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: A review J Clin Epidemiol 1992, 45:743-760. 10.1016/ 0895-4356(92)90052-O 1619454
11. von Essen L Proxy ratings of patient quality of life - factors related to patient-proxy agreement Acta Oncol 2004, 43:229-234. 10.1080/ 02841860410029357 15244245
12. van der Linden FA Kragt JJ Hobart JC Klein M Thompson AJ van der Ploeg HM Proxy measurements in multiple sclerosis: Agreement between patients and their partners on the impact of multiple sclerosis in daily life J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006, 77:1157-1162. 10.1136/jnnp.2006.090795 16820417
13. Pickard AS Johnson JA Feeny DH Shuaib A Carriere KC Nasser AM Agreement between patient and proxy assessments of health-related quality of life after stroke using the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index Stroke 2004, 35:607-612. 10.1161/01.STR.0000110984.91157.BD 14726549
14. Tamim H McCusker J Dendukuri N Proxy reporting of quality of life using the EQ-5D Med Care 2002, 40:1186-1195. 10.1097/00005650-200212000-00006 12458301
15. Sneeuw K.C. Aaronson N.K. Sprangers M.A. Detmar S.B. Wever L.D. Schornagel J.H. Comparison of patient and proxy EORTC QLQ-C30 ratings in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients J Clin Epidemiol 1998 51 617 631 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00040-7 9674669
16. Yasuda N Zimmerman S Hawkes WG Gruber-Baldini AL Hebel JR Magaziner J Concordance of proxy-perceived change and measured change in multiple domains of function in older persons J Am Geriatr Soc 2004, 52:1157-1162. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52315.x 15209655
17. Moinpour CM Lyons B Schmidt SP Chansky K Patchell RA Substituting proxy ratings for patient ratings in cancer clinical trials: An analysis based on a Southwest Oncology Group trial in patients with brain metastases Qual Life Res 2000, 9:219-231. 10.1023/A:1008978512572 10983485
18. Sneeuw KC Aaronson NK Sprangers MA Detmar SB Wever LD Schornagel JH Value of caregiver ratings in evaluating the quality of life of patients with cancer J Clin Oncol 1997, 15:1206-1217. 9060565
19. Jones CA Feeny DH Agreement between patient and proxy responses of health-related quality of life after hip fracture J Am Geriatr Soc 2005, 53:1227-1233. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53374.x 16108944
20. Hobart JC Riazi A Lamping DL Fitzpatrick R Thompson AJ Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: development of a patient-based measure of outcome Health Technol Assess 2004, 8. 14982653
21. Hobart JC Cano S O'Conner R Kinos S Heinzlef O Roullet E Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29): Measurement stability across eight European countries Mult Scler 2003, 9:23.
22. Pickard AS Knight SJ Proxy evaluation of health-related quality of life: a conceptual framework for understanding multiple proxy perspectives Med Care 2005, 43:493-499. 1188232 15838415 10.1097/ 01.mlr.0000160419.27642.a8
23. van der Linden FA Kragt JJ Klein M van der Ploeg HM Polman CH Uitdehaag BM Psychometric evaluation of the multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29) for proxy use J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005, 76:1677-1681. 10.1136/jnnp.2005.065227 16291893
24. Boringa JB Lazeron RH Reuling IE Ader HJ Pfennings L Lindeboom J The brief repeatable battery of neuropsychological tests: Normative values allow application in multiple sclerosis clinical practice Mult Scler 2001, 7:263-267. 11548987
25. Spinhoven P Ormel J Sloekers PP Kempen GI Speckens AE Van Hemert AM A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects Psychol Med 1997, 27:363-370. 10.1017/ S0033291796004382 9089829
26. Kurtzke JF Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS) Neurology 1983, 33:1444-1452. 6685237
27. Lechner-Scott J Kappos L Hofman M Polman CH Ronner H Montalban X Can the Expanded Disability Status Scale be assessed by telephone? Mult Scler 2003, 9:154-159. 10.1191/1352458503ms884oa 12708811
28. Guyatt GH Norman GR Juniper EF Griffith LE A critical look at transition ratings J Clin Epidemiol 2002, 55:900-908. 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00435-3 12393078
29. Cohen J Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates 1988, 19-74.
30. Lee J Koh D Ong CN Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable Comput Biol Med 1989, 19:61-70. 10.1016/0010-4825(89)90036-X 2917462
31. McGraw KO Wong SP Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients Psychological Methods 1996, 1:30-46. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.3
32. Nunnally JC Bernstein IH Psychometric theory New York: McGraw-Hill 3 1994.
33. Zigmond AS Snaith RP The hospital anxiety and depression scale Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983, 67:361-370. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x 6880820
34. Camp SJ Stevenson VL Thompson AJ Miller DH Borras C Auriacombe S Cognitive function in primary progressive and transitional progressive multiple sclerosis: A controlled study with MRI correlates Brain 1999, 122(Pt 7):1341-1348. 10.1093/brain/122.7.1341 10388799
35. Sneeuw KC Sprangers MA Aaronson NK The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease J Clin Epidemiol 2002, 55:1130-1143. 10.1016/ S0895-4356(02)00479-1 12507678
36. Bland JM Altman DG A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement Comput Biol Med 1990, 20:337-340. 10.1016/ 0010-4825(90)90013-F 2257734
37. Jones CA Feeny DH Agreement between patient and proxy responses during recovery after hip fracture: Evidence for the FIM instrument Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006, 87:1382-1387. 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.008 17023250
38. Fischer D Stewart AL Bloch DA Lorig K Laurent D Holman H Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure JAMA 1999, 282:1157-1162. 10.1001/jama.282.12.1157 10501119