Interpreting morphological features in wetland soils with a hydrologic model

Catena

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 153-165

  Vepraskas, M J ^a   Caldwell, P V ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b 1617 Mail Service Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydric soils; Modeling; Wetland hydrology; Wetlands

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; SOIL TYPE; SOIL WATER; WATER TABLE; WETLAND;

NORTH AMERICA; NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 41449087170     PISSN: 03418162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2007.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amoozegar A. Compact constant head permeameter: a convenient device for measuring hydraulic conductivity. In: Topp G.C., et al. (Ed). Advances in measurement of soil physical properties: Bringing theory into practice. SSSA Spec. Publ. vol. 30 (1992), SSSA, Madison, WI 31-42
2. Caldwell P.V., Vepraskas M.J., and Gregory J.D. Physical properties of natural organic soils in Carolina Bays of the Southeastern United States. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71 (2007) 1051-1057
3. Caldwell, P.V., Vepraskas, M.J., Skaggs, R.W., Gregory, J.D., in press. Simulating the water budgets of natural Carolina Bay wetlands. Wetlands.
4. Chescheir G.M., Amatya D.M., and Skaggs R.W. Modeling the hydrology of a natural wetland. International Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI, USA (1994) Paper number 942597
5. Daniels R.B., Gamble E.E., and Nelson L.A. Relations between soil morphology and water-table levels on a dissected North Carolina Coastal Plain Surface. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 35 (1971) 781-784
6. Daniels R.B., Buol S.W., Kleiss H.J., and Ditzler C.A. Soil systems in North Carolina. Tech. Bull. vol. 314 (1999), Dep. of Soil Science, NC State University, Raleigh
7. Environmental Laboratory. Corps of Engineers wetland delineation manual. Technical Report Y-87-1 (1987), US Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS
8. Federal Register. Changes in hydric soils of the United States (1994) Washington, D.C. (July 13)
9. Harbaugh A.W., Banta E.R., Hill M.C., and McDonald M.G. MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model. User guide to modularization concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-92 (2000) 121 p
10. Hayes Jr. W.A., and Vepraskas M.J. Morphological changes in soils produced when hydrology is altered by ditching. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64 (2000) 1893-1904
11. He X., Vepraskas M.J., Skaggs R.W., and Lindbo D.L. Adapting a drainage model to simulate water table levels in Coastal Plain soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66 (2002) 1722-1731
12. He X., Vepraskas M.J., Lindbo D.L., and Skaggs R.W. A method to predict soil saturation frequency and duration from soil color. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67 (2003) 961-969
13. Hershfield, D.M., 1961. Rainfall frequency atlas of the United States. Tech. Pap. No. 40. Weather Bureau, Dep. of Commerce. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.
14. Johnson D.W. Nature of the Bays. The Origin of the Carolina Bays (1942), Columbia University Press, New York
15. Leab R.J. Soil survey of Bladen County, North Carolina (1990), USDA-SCS, U.S. Gov. Print. Off., Washington, D.C.
16. Lees, B., 2004. Characterization and community analysis of three Carolina Bays in Bladen County, North Carolina. M.S. thesis, Department of Botany, NC State University, Raleigh.
17. Mitsch W.J., and Gosselink J.G. Wetlands. 2nd edition (1993), John Wiley & Sons, New York
18. National Research Council. Wetlands: characteristics and boundaries (1995), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
19. Schoeneberger P.J., Wysocki D.A., Benham E.C., and Broderson W.D. Field book for describing and sampling soil. Natural Resources Conservation Service (1998), USDA, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE
20. Simonson G.H., and Boersma L. Soil morphology and water table relations: II. Correlation between annual water table fluctuations and profile features. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc 36 (1972) 649-653
21. Skaggs, R.W., 1999. Drainage simulation models, p. 461-492. In R.W. Skaggs and J. van Schilfgaarde (eds.) Agricultural Drainage. Agron. Monogr. vol. 38, ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
22. Sprecher S.W., and Warne A.G. Accessing and using meteorological data to evaluate wetland hydrology. ERDC/EL TR-WRAP-00-1 (2000), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS
23. United States Dep. of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. WETS table documentation. Elizabethtown lock 2, NC2732 (2002), Water and Climate Center, Portland, OR
24. United States Dep. of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. Version 6.0. G.W. Hurt and L.M. Vasilas (eds.) USDA, NRCS, Lincoln, NE.
25. Vepraskas M.J. Redoximorphic features for identifying aquic conditions. Tech. Bull. no. 301 (1999), NC Agric. Research Serv., Raleigh, NC.
26. Vepraskas M.J., He X., Lindbo D.L., and Skaggs R.W. Calibrating hydric soil field indicators to long-term wetland hydrology. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68 (2004) 1461-1469
27. Vepraskas M.J., Huffman R.L., and Kreiser G.S. Hydrologic models for altered landscapes. Geoderma 131 (2006) 287-298
28. Western Regional Climate Center, 2005. Station data retrieval. Turnbull Creek North Carolina. [Online WWW]. Available URL: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/wea_list.pl?txNTUR. [Accessed 17 Mar 2006].