Universality of the diffusion wake in the gauge-string duality

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 77, Issue 6, 2008, Pages

  Gubser, Steven S ^a   Yarom, Amos ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41449084796     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.066007     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. J. Casalderrey-Solana, E.V. Shuryak, and D. Teaney, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 27, 22 (2005). 1742-6588 10.1088/1742-6596/27/1/003
2. Clearly an infinitely massive quark must also have divergent energy E. But Pt=-dE/dt is finite and closely related to the drag force as calculated for N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory in; see also the discussion at the end of Sec. 2.
3. S.S. Gubser, S.S. Pufu, and A. Yarom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 012301 (2008). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.012301
4. C.P. Herzog, A. Karch, P. Kovtun, C. Kozcaz, and L.G. Yaffe, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 07 (2006) 013. 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/07/013
5. S.S. Gubser, Phys. Rev. D 74, 126005 (2006). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.126005
6. J.J. Friess, S.S. Gubser, and G. Michalogiorgakis, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 09 (2006) 072. 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/09/072
7. A. Yarom, Phys. Rev. D 75, 125010 (2007). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.125010
8. S.S. Gubser and S.S. Pufu, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B790, 42 (2008). 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.08.015
9. S.S. Gubser, S.S. Pufu, and A. Yarom, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 09 (2007) 108. 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/108
10. P.M. Chesler and L.G. Yaffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 152001 (2007). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.152001
11. S.-J. Sin and I. Zahed, Phys. Lett. B 608, 265 (2005). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.01.020
12. H. Liu, K. Rajagopal, and U.A. Wiedemann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 182301 (2006). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.182301
13. J. Casalderrey-Solana and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. D 74, 085012 (2006). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.085012
14. S.-J. Sin and I. Zahed, Phys. Lett. B 648, 318 (2007). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.01.074
15. H. Liu, K. Rajagopal, and U.A. Wiedemann, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 03 (2007) 066. 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/03/066
16. S.S. Gubser, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B790, 175 (2008). 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.09.017
17. J. Casalderrey-Solana and D. Teaney, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 04 (2007) 039. 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/04/039
18. S. Lin and E. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. D 76, 085014 (2007). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.085014
19. S.S. Gubser, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4, 679 (2000). 1095-0761
20. J.J. Friess, S.S. Gubser, and I. Mitra, Phys. Rev. D 72, 104019 (2005). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.104019
21. S.S. Pufu (unpublished).
22. A. Buchel, S. Deakin, P. Kerner, and J.T. Liu, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B784, 72 (2007). 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.06.019
23. L.A. Pando Zayas and C.A. Terrero-Escalante, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 09 (2006) 051. 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/09/051
24. O. Aharony, A. Buchel, and P. Kerner, Phys. Rev. D 76, 086005 (2007). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.086005
25. M. Mahato, L.A.P. Zayas, and C.A. Terrero-Escalante, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 09 (2007) 083. 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/083
26. A. Buchel, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B600, 219 (2001). 10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00051-7
27. S.S. Gubser, C.P. Herzog, I.R. Klebanov, and A.A. Tseytlin, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 05 (2001) 028. 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/05/028
28. A. Buchel, C.P. Herzog, I.R. Klebanov, L.A. Pando Zayas, and A.A. Tseytlin, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 04 (2001) 033. 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/04/033
29. A. Buchel and J.T. Liu, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 11 (2003) 031. 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/11/031
30. C.P. Herzog, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 09 (2006) 032. 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/09/032
31. P. Talavera, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 01 (2007) 086. 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/01/086
32. G. Michalogiorgakis, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 2007.
33. J.J. Friess, S.S. Gubser, G. Michalogiorgakis, and S.S. Pufu, Phys. Rev. D 75, 106003 (2007). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.106003
34. A. Yarom, Phys. Rev. D 75, 105023 (2007). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.105023
35. Near the quark, the flow is not hydrodynamical. A near-field account can probably be given, along the lines of.
36. There is a subtlety when Δ is between 2 and 3: different QFT's exist, which are conformal at least in a large N limit, which allow Δ to be exchanged with 4-Δ. The simplest assumption is Δ 2, but the precise form of the boundary condition on δ does not matter in our analysis.
37. Intriguingly, we do not need to impose any boundary conditions at the horizon as we have in the discussion following 41. It seems that at order 1/k the constraint equation 40 is enough to ensure that δ and all the Ei's are finite at the horizon.
38. A. Buchel, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B731, 109 (2005). 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.10.014
39. J. Casalderrey-Solana, E.V. Shuryak, and D. Teaney, arXiv:hep-ph/0602183.
40. K. Pilch and N.P. Warner, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B594, 209 (2001). 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00656-8
41. I.R. Klebanov and M.J. Strassler, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 08 (2000) 052. 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/08/052
42. S.S. Adler (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 052301 (2006). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.052301
43. J. Adams (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 152301 (2005). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.152301
44. J.G. Ulery (STAR Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A774, 581 (2006). NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.06.092
45. A. Adare (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 232302 (2007). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.232302
46. M.J. Horner (STAR Collaboration), J. Phys. G JPGPED 0954-3899 34, S995 (2007). 10.1088/0954-3899/34/8/S142
47. J.G. Ulery (STAR Collaboration), arXiv:0704.0224.
48. J. Jia (PHENIX Collaboration), arXiv:0705.3060.
49. H. Stoecker, Nucl. Phys. A750, 121 (2005). NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.12.074
50. J. Ruppert and B. Muller, Phys. Lett. B 618, 123 (2005). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.04.075
51. V. Koch, A. Majumder, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 172302 (2006). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.172302
52. A.D. Polosa and C.A. Salgado, Phys. Rev. C 75, 041901 (2007). PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.75.041901
53. I. Vitev, Phys. Lett. B 630, 78 (2005). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.09.082
54. A.K. Chaudhuri and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 062301 (2006). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.062301
55. T. Renk and J. Ruppert, Phys. Rev. C 73, 011901 (2006). PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.73.011901
56. T. Renk and J. Ruppert, Phys. Lett. B 646, 19 (2007). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.01.008
57. X.-y. Lin, arXiv:nucl-ex/0701050.
58. A. Buchel and J.T. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 090602 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.090602
59. P. Kovtun, D.T. Son, and A.O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 111601 (2005). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.111601
60. A. Buchel, J.T. Liu, and A.O. Starinets, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B707, 56 (2005). 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.11.055
61. A. Buchel, arXiv:0708.3459.
62. S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov, and A.M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 (1998). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00377-3
63. E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998). 1095-0761
64. I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B556, 89 (1999). 10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00387-9
65. S. de Haro, S.N. Solodukhin, and K. Skenderis, Commun. Math. Phys. 217, 595 (2001). CMPHAY 0010-3616 10.1007/s002200100381
66. M. Bianchi, D.Z. Freedman, and K. Skenderis, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B631, 159 (2002).
67. K. Skenderis, Classical Quantum Gravity CQGRDG 0264-9381 19, 5849 (2002). 10.1088/0264-9381/19/22/306
68. O. Aharony, A. Buchel, and A. Yarom, Phys. Rev. D 72, 066003 (2005). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.066003
69. V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, Commun. Math. Phys. 208, 413 (1999). CMPHAY 0010-3616 10.1007/s002200050764
70. In it was shown that, even when the boundary conditions imply that the metric fluctuations vanish at the AdS boundary, the stringy source induces an O(r3) k independent term in the series expansion for the metric fluctuations. This O(r3) contribution is apparently related to the infinite mass of the quark and corresponds to a delta function at the location of the quark when going to real space. Regardless, it does not appear in the 1/k expansion that we are considering here.