'Parcours de Femme 2001': A french opinion survey on overall disease and everyday life management in 1870 women presenting with gynecological or breast cancer and their caregivers

Annals of Oncology

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1056-1064

  Serin, Daniel ^a   Dilhuydy, J M ^b   Romestaing, P ^c   Guiochet, N ^d   Gledhill, J ^e   Bret, P ^f   Savary, J ^f   Flinois, A ^g  

^a INSTITUT SAINTE CATHERINE   (France)

^b INSTITUT BERGONIÉ   (France)

^c CENTRE HOSPITALIER LYON SUD   (France)

^d Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace   (France)

^e INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

^f BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB   (United States)

^g Harris Medical International   (France)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Delivery of patient care; Gynecological cancer; Patient information; Supportive care

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

AFFECT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER THERAPY; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FAMILY LIFE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FRANCE; GYNECOLOGIC CANCER; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASS MEDIUM; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SIDE EFFECT; SOCIAL ASPECT; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 4143153998     PISSN: 09237534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh265     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Serin D, Pujol H, Schraub S, Chevalier H. Parcours de Femmes: A French opinion survey on psychological aspects and feelings of 2,874 patients treated for breast or gynecological cancer and of their medical oncological teams. Bull Cancer 1998; 85: 578-588.
2. Veronesi U, Von Kleist S, Redmond K et al. Caring about women and cancer (CAWAC): a European survey of the perspectives and experiences of women with female cancers. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35: 1667-1675.
3. Venn MJ, Darling E, Dickens C, Slevin ML. The experience and impact of contacting a cancer information service. Eur J Cancer Care 1996; 5: 38-42.
4. Vennin P, Hecquet B, Marcuzzi I, Demaille MC. Information and participation preferences among patients with breast cancer and their doctors. Bull Cancer 1995; 82: 698-704.
5. Fitch MI, Gray RE, Franssen E. Perspectives on living with ovarian cancer: older women's views. Oncol Nurs Forum 2001; 28: 1433-1442.
6. Fitch MI, Gray RE, Franssen E. Women's perspectives regarding the impact of ovarian cancer. Cancer Nurs 2000; 23: 359-366.
7. Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A et al. The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 2000; 88: 225-236.
8. Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer 2001; 84: 48-51.
9. Lobb EA, Kenny DT, Butow PN, Tattersall MD. Women's preferences for discussion of prognosis in early breast cancer. Health Expect 2001; 4: 48-57.
10. Rainey LC. Effects of preparatory patient education for radiation oncology patients. Cancer 1985; 56: 1056-1061.
11. Fallowfield L, Ford S, Lewis S. No news is not good news: information preferences of patients with cancer. Psychooncology 1995; 4: 197-202.
12. Alliot C. Les patients connaissent-ils leur traitement habituel? Enquête à l'admission dans un service de mé decine. Presse Med 2000; 29: 369.
13. Tamburini M, Gangeri L, Brunelli C et al. Assessment of hospitalised cancer patient's needs by the needs evaluation questionnaire. Ann Oncol 2000; 11: 31-37.
14. Stiggelbout AM, Kiebert GM. A role for the sick role. Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 157: 383-389.
15. Nair MG, Hickok JT, Roscoe JA, Morrow GR. Sources of information used by patients to learn about chemotherapy side-effects. J Cancer Educ 2000; 15: 19-22.
16. Jones WL, Rimer B, Engstrom PF et al. Important gaps in patient's knowledge prior to chemotherapy. Prog Clin Biol Res 1983; 130: 391-400.
17. Bruera E, Willey JS, Palmer JL, Rosales M. Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma. Cancer 2002; 94: 2076-2080.
18. Gattellari M, Voigt KJ, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN. When the treatment goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions? J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 503-513.
19. Larue F, Fontaine A, Brasseur L. Evolution of the French public's knowledge and attitudes regarding postoperative pain, cancer pain, and their treatments: two national surveys over a six-year period. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 659-664.
20. Aistars J. Fatigue in the cancer patient: a conceptual approach to a clinical problem. Oncol Nurs Forum 1987; 14: 25-30.
21. Winningham ML, Nail LM, Burke MB et al. Fatigue and the cancer experience: the state of the knowledge. Oncol Nurs Forum 1994; 21: 23-36.
22. Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A et al. Comparison of breast and rectal cancer patients quality of life: results of a four year prospective field study. Eur J Cancer Care 2003; 12: 215-223.
23. Dilhuydy JM, Monira MH, Perrié N et al. Evaluation of the first social consultation in oncology: a series of 200 cases. Bull Cancer 2000; 87: 348-354.
24. Krakowski I, Chardot C, Bey P et al. Coordinated organization of symptoms management and support in all the stages of cancer disease: putting in place pluridisciplinary structures of supportive oncological care. Bull Cancer 2001; 88: 321-328.
25. Rapport de la Commission d'Orientation sur le Cancer remis au Ministre de la Santé, le 16 janvier 2003. Direction Gé nérale de la Santé, Cellule Communication, Paris. [On-line]. http://www.sante.gouv.fr/htm/dossiers/cancer/index.htm (18 July 2003, date last accessed).