Wavelets for urban spatial feature discrimination: Comparisons with fractal, spatial autocorrelation, and spatial co-occurrence approaches

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 70, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 803-812

  Myint, Soe Win ^a   Lam, Nina S N ^b   Tyler, John M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Louisiana State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRACTALS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SENSORS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

CO-OCCURRENCE TECHNIQUE; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION; SPATIAL FEATURE DISCRIMINATION; URBAN MAPPING;

REMOTE SENSING;

IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAPPING METHOD; PIXEL; REMOTE SENSING; SPATIAL DATA; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; URBAN AREA; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

EID: 4143148548     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.70.7.803     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Albuz, Elif, E. Kocalar, A.A. Khokhar, 1999. Vector-wavelet based scalable indexing and retrieval system for large color image archives, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44:3021-3024.
2. Arai, K., 1993. A classification method with a spatial-spectral variability, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14:699-709.
3. Clarke, K.C., 1986. Computation of the Fractal Dimension of Topographic Surfaces Using the Triangular Prism Surface Area Method, Computers and Geosciences 12(5):713-722.
4. Conners, R.W., and C. Harlow, 1980. A theoretical comparison of texture algorithms, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2(3):204-222.
5. Cushnie, J.L., 1987. The interactive effect of spatial resolution and degree of internal variability within land-cover types on classification accuracies, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 8:12-29.
6. De Jong, S.M., and P.A. Burrough, 1995. A Fractal Approach to the classification of Mediterranean Vegetation Types in Remotely Sensed Images, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 61:1041-1053.
7. Emerson, C.W., N.S.N Lam, and D.A. Quattrochi, 1999. Multi-Scale Fractal Analysis of Image Texture and Pattern, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 65(1):51-61.
8. Edwards G., R. Landary, and K.P.B. Thomson, 1988. Texture analysis of forest regeneration sites in high-resolution SAR imagery, Proceedings of the International Geosciences and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS 88), ESA SP-284 (Paris: European Space Agency), pp. 1355-1360.
9. Franklin, S.E., R.J. Hall, L.M. Moskal, A.J. Maudie, and M.B. Lavigne, 2000. Incorporating texture into classification of forest species composition from airborne multispectral images, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(1):61-79.
10. Fung, T., and K. Chan., 1994. Spatial composition of spectral classes: A structural approach for image analysis of heterogeneous land-use and land-cover types, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 60(2):173-180.
11. Gong, P., 1994. Reducing boundary effects in a kernel-based classifier, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15:1131-1139.
12. Gong, P., and P.J. Howarth, 1990. The use of structural information for improving land cover classification accuracies at the rural urban fringe, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 56(1):67-73.
13. _. 1992. Frequency based contextual classification and gray level vector reduction for land use identification, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 58(4):423-437.
14. Haralick, R.M., K. Shanmugan, and J. Dinstein, 1973. Textural features for image classification, IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-3(6):610-621.
15. Hodgson, M.E., 1998. What size window for image classification? A cognitive perspective, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 64(8):797-807.
16. Jaggi, S., D.A. Quattrochi, and N.S.N. Lam, 1993. Implementation and operation of three fractal measurement algorithms for analysis of remote-sensing data, Computer and Geosciences, 19(6):745-767.
17. Lam, N.S.N., and D.A. Quattrochi, 1992. On the Issues of Scale, Resolution, and Fractal Analysis in the Mapping Sciences, Professional Geographer, 44(1):88-97.
18. Lam, N.S.N., and L. De Cola, 1993. Fractal Simulation and Interpolation, Fractals in Geography (N.S.N. Lam and L. De Cola, editors), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 56-74.
19. Lam, N.S.N, D. Quattrochi, H. Qui, and W. Zhao, 1998. Environmental assessment and monitoring with image characterization and modeling system using multiscale remote sensing data, Applied Geographic Studies 2(2):77-93.
20. Lam, N.S.-N., H.-L. Qiu, D.A. Quattrochi, and C.W. Emerson, 2002. An evaluation of fractal methods for characterizing image complexity, Cartography and Geographic Information Science 29(1):25-35.
21. Lo, C.P., D.A. Quatrochi, and J.C. Luvall, 1997. Application of high-resolution thermal infrared remote sensing and GIS to assess the urban heat island effect, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(2):287-304.
22. Mallat, S.G., 1989. A Theory for multi-resolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11:674-693.
23. Mandelbrot, B., 1983. The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman and Co., New York.
24. Mark, D.M., and P.B. Aronson, 1984. Scale Dependent Fractal Dimensions of Topographic Surfaces: An Empirical Investigation with Applications in Geomorphology and Computer Mapping, Mathematical Geology, 16:671-683.
25. Misiti, M., Y. Misiti, G. Oppenheim, and J. Poggi, 1996. Wavelet Toolbox, The Math Works, Inc., Massachusetts.
26. Myint, S.W., 2001. A Robust Texture Analysis and Classification Approach for Urban Land-Use and Land-Cover Feature Discrimination, GeoCarto International, 16(4):27-38.
27. Myint, S.W., N.S.N. Lam, J. Tyler, 2002. An Evaluation of Four Different Wavelet Decomposition Procedures for Spatial Feature Discrimination Within and Around Urban Areas, Transactions in GIS, 6(4):403-429.
28. Myint, S.W., 2003. Fractal Approaches in Texture Analysis and Classification of Remotely Sensed Data: Comparisons with Spatial Autocorrelation Techniques and Simple Descriptive Statistics, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(9):1925-1947.
29. Peddle, D.R., and S.E. Franklin, 1991. Image Texture Processing and Data Integration for Surface Pattern Discrimination, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 57:413-20.
30. Pesaresi, M., 2000. Texture Analysis for Urban Pattern Recognition Using Fine-resolution Panchromatic Satellite Imagery, Geographical and Environmental Modeling, 4(1):43-63.
31. Quattrochi, D.A., N.S.N. Lam, H. Qiu, and W. Zhao, 1997. Image Characterization and Modeling System (ICAMS): A Geographic Information System for the Characterization and Modeling of Multiscale Remote Sensing Data, Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS (D.A. Quattrochi and M.F. Goodchild, editors), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 295-308.
32. Sadler, G.J., M.J. Barnsley, and S.L. Barr, 1991. Information extraction from remotely-sensed images for urban land analysis, Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Geographical Information Systems (EGIS'91), Brussels, Belgium, April, EGIS Foundation, Utrecht, pp. 955-964.
33. Sheikholeslami, G., A. Zhang, and L. Bian, 1999. A Multi-Resolution Content-Based Retrieval Approach for Geographic Images, Geoinformatica, 3(2):109-139.
34. Strang, G., and T. Nguyen, 1997. Wavelets and Filter Banks, Wellesley-Cambridge Press, revised edition, 1997, Wellesley, Massachusetts, 520 p.
35. Townshend, J.R.G., 1981. Terrain Analysis and Remote Sensing. George Allen and Unwin: London: 272 p.
36. Woodcock, C., and V.J. Harward, 1992. Nested-hierarchical scene models and image segmentation, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13:3167-3187.
37. Woodcock, C.E., A.H. Strahler, and D.L.B. Jupp, 1988. The use of variograms in remote sensing: I. Scene models and simulated images, Remote Sensing of Environment, 25:323-348.
38. Zhu, C., and X. Yang, 1998. Study of remote sensing image texture analysis and classification using wavelet, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13:3167-3187.