The future of research that promotes cancer screening

Cancer

Volumn 101, Issue 5 SUPPL., 2004, Pages 1251-1259

  Meissner, Helen I ^a   Vernon, Sally W ^b   Rimer, Barbara K ^c   Wilson, Katherine M ^d   Rakowski, William ^e   Briss, Peter A ^f   Smith, Robert A ^g  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c IL   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^e BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^g AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral intervention; Cancer screening; External validity; Research design; Standardized measures

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER RESEARCH; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 4143124545     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20510     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Rakowski WR, Breslau E. Perspectives on behavioral and social science research on cancer screening. Cancer. 2004; 101(5 Suppl):1118-1130.
2. Smith M, French L, Barry HC. Periodic abstinence from Pap (PAP) smear study: women's perceptions of Pap smear screening. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1:203-208.
3. Morton E, Tambor E, Rimer BK, Tessaro I, Farrell D, Siegler IC. Impact of National Cancer Institute revised mammography screening guidelines on women 40-49. Womens Health Issues. 1996;6:246-254.
4. Franco EL. Are we ready for a paradigm change in cervical cancer screening? Lancet. 2003;362:1866-1867.
5. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Wilkinson RG. The society and population health reader: income inequality and health. New York: The New Press, 1999.
6. Smedley BD, Syme SL. Promoting health: intervention strategies from social and behavioral research [monograph online]. Available from URL: http://www.nap.edu/books/0309071755/html [accessed Sep 9, 2003].
7. Wilkinson RG. Unhealthy societies: the afflictions of inequality. London: Routledge, 1996.
8. Zapka JG, Lemon SC. Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations. Cancer. 2004;101(5 Suppl): 1165-1187.
9. Bastani R, Yabroff KR, Myers RE, Glenn B. Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening. Cancer. 2004;101(5 Suppl):1188-1200.
10. Green LW, Richard L, Potvin L. Ecological foundations of health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10:270-281.
11. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15:351-377.
12. Stokols D. Establishing and maintaining healthy environments. Toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol. 1992;47:6-22.
13. Siegrist J. Place, social exchange and health: proposed sociological framework. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1283-1293.
14. Subramanian SV, Kawachi I, Kennedy BP. Does the state you live in make a difference? Multilevel analysis of self-rated health in the U.S. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53:9-19.
15. Marmot M. Multilevel approaches to understanding social determinants. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000:349-367.
16. Briss PA, Zaza S, Pappaioanou M, et al. Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services-methods. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:35-43.
17. Sorensen G, Emmons K, Hunt MK, Johnston D. Implications of the results of community intervention trials. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;19:379-416.
18. Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to- effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1261-1267.
19. Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:119-127.
20. Pasick RJ, Hiatt RA, Paskett ED. Lessons learned from community-based cancer screening intervention research. Cancer. 2004;101(5 Suppl):1146-1164.
21. Vernon SW, Briss P, Tiro J, Warnecke RB. Some methodological lessons learned from cancer screening research. Cancer. 2004;101(5 Suppl):1131-1145.
22. Glasgow RE, Marcus AC, Bull SS, Wilson KM. Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions. Cancer. 2004;101(5 Suppl):1239-1250.
23. Rimer BK, Briss PA, Zeller PK, Chan E, Woolf SH. Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening? Cancer. 2004;101(5 Suppl):1214-1228.
24. Clark MA, Rakowski W, Bonacore LB. Repeat mammography: prevalence estimates and considerations for assessment. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26:201-211.
25. Vernon SW, Meissner H, Klabunde C, et al. Measures for ascertaining use of colorectal cancer screening in behavioral, health services, and epidemiologic research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:898-905.
26. Yabroff KR, Mandelblatt JS. Interventions targeted toward patients to increase mammography use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:749-757.
27. Rimer BK. Mammography use in the U.S.: trends and the impact of interventions. Ann Behav Med. 1994;16:317-326.
28. Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before- and- after evaluation. JAMA. 2001;285:1992-1995.
29. Davidson KW, Goldstein M, Kaplan RM, et al. Evidence-based behavioral medicine: what is it and how do we achieve it? Ann Behav Med. 2003;26:161-171.
30. Scott TL, Wong FL, Rimer BK. Dissemination of an evidence-based intervention manual to improve managed care mammography rates. Manag Care Interface. 1999;12:83-90.
31. Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2003;97: 1528-1540.
32. Hiatt RA, Klabunde C, Breen N, Swan J, Ballard-Barbash R. Cancer screening practices from National Health Interview Surveys: past, present, and future. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94:1837-1846.
33. Institute of Medicine. Speaking of health: assessing health communication strategies for diverse populations. Washington, DC: National Research Council, Institute of Medicine, 2002.
34. Finney Rutten LJ, Nelson DE, Meissner HI. Examination of population-wide trends in barriers to cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective (1987-2000). Prev Med. 2004;38:258-268.
35. Forbes C, Jepson R, Martin-Hirsch P. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;3:CD002834.
36. Merenstein D. A piece of my mind. Winners and losers. JAMA. 2004;291:15-16.
37. Chan EC, Vernon SW, Haynes MC, O'Donnell FT, Ahn C. Physician perspectives on the importance of facts men ought to know about prostate-specific antigen testing. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:350-356.
38. Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93:635-641.
39. Borders TF, Warner RD, Sutkin G. Satisfaction with health care and cancer screening practices among women in a largely rural region of West Texas. Prev Med. 2003;36:652-658.
40. Anderson LM, Fielding JE, Mullen PD. Recommendations to promote healthy social environments. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 24:21-24.
41. Rakowski W, Breen N, Meissner H, Rimer BK, Verson SW, Clark MA. Prevalence and correlates of repeat mammography among women aged 55-79 in the Year 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med. 2004;39:1-10.
42. Fernandez-Esquer ME, Espinoza P, Ramirez AG, McAlister AL. Repeated Pap smear screening among Mexican-American women. Health Educ Res. 2003;18:477-487.
43. Kerner JF, Yedidia M, Padgett D, et al. Realizing the promise of breast cancer screening: clinical follow-up after abnormal screening among black women. Prev Med. 2003; 37:92-101.
44. Andersen R, Urban N, Ramsey S, Briss PA. Examining the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening promotion. Cancer. 2004;101(5 Suppl):xxx-xxx.
45. Miles A, Wardle J, McCaffery K, Williamson S, Atkin W. The effects of colorectal cancer screening on health attitudes and practices. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12: 651-655.
46. Clark MA, Rakowski W, Ehrich B. Breast and cervical cancer screening: associations with personal, spouse's, and combined smoking status. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:513-516.
47. Fontaine KR, Heo M, Allison DB. Body weight and cancer screening among women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001;10:463-470.
48. Miles AE, Cockburn J, Smith R, Wardle FJ. A perspective from countries using organized screening programs. Cancer. 2004;101(5 Suppl):1201-1213.
49. Madlensky L, Goel V, Polzer J, Ashbury FD. Assessing the evidence for organised cancer screening programmes. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:1648-1653.