Functional Difference Predictors (FDPs): Measuring meaningful image differences

Conference Record of the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages 1388-1392

  Ferwerda, James A ^a   Pellacini, Fabio ^b  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^b Pixar Animation Studios   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCE PREDICTORS (FDP); IMAGE ERRORS; VISIBLE DIFFERENCE PREDICTORS (VDP); VISUAL TASKS;

ALGORITHMS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; RAY TRACING; REFLECTION;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 4143121509     PISSN: 10586393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Arvo, J., Torrance, K. and Smits, B. 1994. A Framework for the Analysis of Error in Global Illumination Algorithms. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1994, 75-84.
2. Bolin, M.R. and Meyer, G.W. 1998. A Perceptually Based Adaptive Sampling Algorithm. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1998, 299-310.
3. Daly, S. 1993. The visual difference predictor: An Algorithm for the assessment of visual fidelity. Digital Image and Human Vision, MIT Press.
4. Gibson, J.J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associated.
5. Lubin, J. 1995. A visual discrimination model for imaghing system design and evaluation. Vision Models for target detection and recognition, World Scientific, E. Peli editor.
6. Madison, C., Thompson, W., Kersten, D., Shirley, P and Smits, B. 2001. Use of interreflection and shadow for surface contact. Perception & Psychophysics, Psychonomic Society Publications, 63(2), 187-194.
7. Myszkowski, K., Tawara, T., Akamine, H. and Sidel, H.P. 2001. Perception-Guided Global Illumination Solution for Animation Rendering. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, 221-230.
8. Pellacini, F., Ferwerda, J.A. and Greenberg, D.P. 2000. Toward a Psychophysically-based Light Reflection Model for Image Synthesis. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, 55-64.
9. Palmer, S.E. 1999. Vision Science. MIT Press.
10. Rademacher, P, Lengyel, J., Cutrell, E. and Whitted, T. 2001. Measuring the Perception of Visual Realism in Images. In Rendering Techniques 2001, 235-248.
11. Ramasubramanian, M., Pattanaik, S.N. and Greenberg, D.P. 1999. A Perceptually Based Physical Error Metric for Realistic Image Synthesis. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1999, 73-82.
12. Rodger, J.C. and Browse R.A. (2000). Choosing rendering parameters for the effective communication of 3D shape. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 20(2), 20-28.
13. Rushmeier, H., Rogowitz, B., and Piatko, C. 2000. Perceptual issues in substituting texture for geometry. In Human Vision and Electronic Images V, Proc. Of SPIE, 3959, 372-383.
14. Schrater, P. R., & Kersten, D. 1999. Statistical structure and task dependence in visual cue integration. Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision - Modeling, Learning, Computing, and Sampling. Fort Collins, Colorado, June 1999.
15. Wanger, L.R., Ferwerda, J.A. and Greenberg, D.P. 1992. Perceiving Spatial Relationships in Computer-generated Images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 12(3), 44-58.
16. Watson, B., Friedman, A., McGraffey, A. 2001. Measuring and Predicting Visual Fidelity. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, 213-220.
17. Winer, B.J., Brown, D. and Michels, K. 1991. Statistical Principles in Experimental Psychology. McGraw-Hill.