Constraining user response via multimodal dialog interface

International Journal of Speech Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 251-258

  Baker, Kirk ^a   Mckenzie, Ashley ^b   Biermann, Alan ^b   Webelhuth, Gert ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Duke University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Constrain user response; Multimodal dialog interface; Speech recognition

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAIN USER RESPONSE; DESIGN PROCESS; MULTIMODAL DIALOG INTERFACE; SPEECH INTERFACES;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; SEMANTICS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; USER INTERFACES; VOCABULARY CONTROL;

INTERFACES (COMPUTER);

EID: 4143118159     PISSN: 13812416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:IJST.0000037069.82313.57     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baber, C., Johnson, G., and Cleaver, D. (1997). Factors affecting users' choice of words in speech-based interaction with public technology. International Journal of Speech Technology, 2(1):45-49.
2. Baca, J. (1998). Comparing effects of navigational interface modalities on speaker prosodics. Assets '98, Proceedings of the Third International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies. Marina del Rey: ACM, pp. 3-10.
3. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044):556-559.
4. Balentine, B. (1999). Re-engineering the speech menu. In D. Gardner-Bonneau (Ed.), Human Factors and Voice Interactive Systems. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 205-235.
5. Becchetti, C. and Ricotti, L.P. (1999). Speech Recognition: Theory and C++ Implementation. West Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons.
6. Boyce, S. (1999). Spoken natural language dialog systems: User interface issues for the future. In D. Gardner-Bonneau (Ed.), Human Factors and Voice Interactive Systems. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 37-61.
7. Boyce, S. (2000). Natural spoken dialog systems for telephony applications. Communications of the ACM, 43(9):29-34.
8. David, P. and Hirshman, E. (1998). Dual-mode presentation and its effect on implicit and explicit memory. American Journal of Psychology, 111(1):77-88.
9. Gardner-Bonneau, D. (1999). Guidelines for speech-enabled IVR application design. In D. Gardner-Bonneau (Ed.), Human Factors and Voice Interactive Systems. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 147-162.
10. Goolkasian, P. (2000). Pictures, words, and sounds: From which format are we best able to reason? The Journal of General Psychology, 127(4):439-459.
11. Grasso, M. and Finin, T. (1997). Task integration in multimodal speech recognition environments. Crossroads, 3(3): 19-22.
12. Hardy, H., Baker, K., Devillers, L., Lamel, L., Rosset, S., Strzalkowski, T., Ursu, C., and Webb, N.(2002). Multi-layer dialogue annotation for automated multilingual customer service. Proceedings of the ISLE Workshop on Dialogue Tagging for MultiModal Human Computer Interaction. Edinburgh.
13. Karsenty, L. (2002). Shifting the design philosophy of spoken natural language dialog: From invisible to transparent systems. International Journal of Speech Technology, 5:147-157.
14. Martin, A. and Przybocki, M. (2001). Analysis of results. 2001 NIST Large Vocabulary Conversational Speech Recognition Workshop.
15. Mayer, R. and Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2):312-320.
16. Mayer, R., Moreno, R., Borrie, M., and Vagge, S. (1999). Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia communications by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4):638-643.
17. Mousavi, S.Y., Low, R., and Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2):319-334.
18. Novick, D., Hansen, B., Sutton, S., and Marshall, C. (1999). Limiting factors of automated telephone dialogs. In D. Gardner-Bonneau (Ed.), Human Factors and Voice Interactive Systems. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 163-186.
19. Shneiderman, B. (1997). Designing the User Interface. 3rd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20. Velayo, R.S. and Quirk, C. (2000). How do presentation modality and strategy use influence memory for paired concepts? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27(6): 126-135.
21. Walker, M., Fromer, J., Di Fabbrizio, G., Mestel, C., and Hindle, D. (1998). What can I say?: Evaluating a spoken language interface to email. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. NY; ACM, pp. 582-589.
22. Yeung, A. (1999). Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading comprehension tasks with vocabulary definitions. The Journal of Experimental Education, 67(3): 197-212.