Comparison of the navicular region of newborn foals and adult horses by magnetic resonance imaging

Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A: Physiology Pathology Clinical Medicine

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 143-149

  Hevesi, A ^a   Stanek, Ch ^a,b   Garamvolgyi, R ^a   Petrasi, Zs ^a   Bogner, P ^a   Repa, I ^a  

^a SZENT ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EQUIDAE; EQUUS CABALLUS;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL LAMENESS; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FORELIMB; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HINDLIMB; HISTOLOGY; HORSE; HORSE DISEASE; MALE; NEWBORN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; TARSAL BONE;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; FEMALE; FORELIMB; HINDLIMB; HORSE DISEASES; HORSES; LAMENESS, ANIMAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; TARSAL BONES;

EID: 4143108332     PISSN: 0931184X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.2004.00615.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Berquist, T. H., 1984: Magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience in orthopedic radiology. Magnet. Reson. Imag. 2, 41-50.
2. Busoni, V., and J.-M. Denoix, 2001: Ultrasonography of the podotrochlear apparatus in the horses using a transcuneal approach: technique and reference images. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 42, 534-540.
3. Butler, J., C. Colles, S. Dyson, and P. Poulos, 2000: The foot pastern and fetlock. In: Clinical Radiology of the Horse, 2nd edn, pp. 27-130. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
4. Denoix, J.-M., 2000: The Equine Distal Limb: An Atlas of Clinical Anatomy and Comparative Imaging. Manson Publishing Ltd, London.
5. Denoix, J. M., C. Nathalie, R. Bernard, and J. F. Lebas, 1993: Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine foot. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 34, 405-111.
6. Dyson, S., 2002: Subjective and quantitative scintigraphic assessment of the equine foot and its relationship with foot pain. Equine Vet. J. 34, 164-170.
7. Dyson, S., R. Murray, M. Schramme, and M. Branch, 2003: Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine foot: 15 horses. Equine Vet. J. 35, 18-26.
8. Kaser-Hotz, B., and G. Ueltschi, 1992: Radiographic appearance of the navicular bone in sound horses. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 33, 9-17.
9. Kleiter, M., S. Kneissl, Ch. Stanek, E. Mayrhofer, U. Baulain, and E.Deegen, 1999: Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the equime digit. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 40, 15-22.
10. Kotani, H., Y. Taura, A. Sakai, T. Tsuka, and Y. Kageyama, 2000: Antemortem evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging of the equine flexor tendon. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 62, 81-84.
11. Moon, K. L., H. K. Genant, and C. A. Helms, 1983: Musculoskeletal applications of nuclear magnetic resonance. Radiology 147, 161-171.
12. O'Brien, T. R., T. M. Millman, R. R. Pool, and Suter, P. F. (1975): Navicular disease in the horse: an investigation relative to a new radiographic projection. J. Am. Vet. Rad. Soc. 16, 39-50.
13. Park, R., T. Nelson, and P. Hoopes, 1987: Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal equine digit and metacarpophalangeal joint. Vet. Radiol. 28, 105-116.
14. Ruohoniemi, M., and P. Tevahartiala, 1999: Computed tomographic evaluation of Finnhorse cadaver feet with radiographically problematic findings on the flexor surface of the navicular bone. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 40, 225-281.
15. Ruohoniemi, M., M. Kärkkäinen, and P. Tervahartiala, 1997: Evaluation of the variably ossified collateral cartilages of the distal phalanx and adjacent anatomic structures in the Finnhorse with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 38, 344-351.
16. Sage, A., and A. Turner, 2000: Ultrasonography in the horses with palmar foot pain: 13 cases. Proc. Am. Ass. Equine Pract. 46, 380-381.
17. Tietje, S., 1995: Die Computertomographie im Strahlbeinbereich des Pferdes: ein Vergleich mit der konventionellen Röntgendarstellung. Pferdeheilkunde 11, 51-61.
18. Tietje, S., M. Nowak, S. Petzoldt, and H. Weiler, 2001: Computed tomographic evaluation of the distal aspect of the deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT) in horses. Pferdeheilkunde 17, 21-29.
19. Tucker, R., 2001: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in equine musculosceletal conditions. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 17, 145-157.
20. Widmer, W. R., K. A. Buckwalter, J. F. Fessler, M. A. Hill, D. C. VanSickle, and S. Ivancevich, 2000: Use of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of navicular syndrome in the horse. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 41, 108-116.
21. Wright, I. M., 1993: A study of 118 cases of navicular disease: radiological features. Equine Vet. J. 25, 493-500.
22. Wright, I. M., and J. Douglas, 1993: Biomechanical considerations in the treatment of navicular disease. Vet. Rec. 133, 109-114.
23. Wright, I. M., J. Kidd, and B. H. Thorp, 1998: Gross, histological, histomorphometric features of the navicular bone and related structures in the horse. Equine Vet. J. 30, 220-234.