The man behind the mask: Accuracy and predictors of eyewitness offender descriptions

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 722-729

  Fahsing, Iyar A ^a   Ask, Karl ^b   Granhag, Pär Anders ^b  

^a National Criminal Investigation Service   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; DEFENSE MECHANISM; FACE; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PRISONER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECALL; THEFT; VICTIM; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; CRIME VICTIMS; FACE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PRISONERS; REPRESSION; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); THEFT; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 4143108054     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.722     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Christianson, S.-Å. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284-309.
2. Christianson, S.-Å., & Hübinette, B. (1993). Hands up! A study of witnesses' emotional reactions and memories associated with bank robberies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 365-379.
3. Clifford, B. R., & Hollin, C. R. (1981). Effects of the type of incident and the number of perpetrators on eyewitness memory, Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 364-370.
4. Coupe, T., & Griffiths, M. (1996). Solving residential burglary (Crime Detection and Prevention Series No. 77). London; Home Office.
5. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identification: The eye witness, psychology, and the law. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Davies, G. (1992). Influencing public policy on eye witnessing: Problems and possibilities. In F. Lösel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 265-274). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
7. Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183-201.
8. Ebbesen, E. B., & Rienick, C. B. (1998). Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 745-762.
9. Farrington, D. P., & Lambert, S. (1997). Predicting offender profiles from victim and witness descriptions. In J. L. Jackson & D. A. Bekerian (Eds.), Offender profiling: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 133-158). Chichester, England: Wiley.
10. Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
11. Kassin, S. M., Tubb, V. A., Hosch, H. M., & Memon, A. (2001). On the "general acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research. American Psychologist, 56, 405-416.
12. Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998), Police officers' perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 323-330.
13. Köhnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 3-28.
14. Konecni, V. J., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1986). Courtroom testimony by psychologists on eyewitness identification issues: Critical notes and reflections. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 117-126.
15. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Memory metaphors and the real-life/ laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 167-228.
16. Kuehn, L. L. (1974). Looking down a gun barrel: Person perception and violent crime. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 1159-1164.
17. Lindsay, R. C. L., Martin, R., & Webber, L. (1994). Default values in eyewitness descriptions: A problem for the match-to-description lineup foil selection strategy. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 527-541.
18. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Loftus, E. F., Schooler, J. W., Boone, S. M., & Kline, D. (1987). Time went by so slowly: Overestimation of event duration by males and females. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 3-13.
20. Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester, England: Wiley.
21. Norwegian Police Academy. (1990). Rapportskrivning [Report writing]. Oslo, Norway: Author.
22. Penrod, S. D., Loftus, E. F., & Winkler, J. (1982). The reliability of eyewitness testimony. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 119-168). New York: Academic Press.
23. Ross, D. F., Read, J. D., & Toglia, M. P. (Eds.). (1994). Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Sporer, S. L. (1996). Psychological aspects of person descriptions. In S. L. Sporer, R. S. Malpass, & G. Köhnken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 53-86). Mahwah, NJ. Erlbaum
25. Sporer, S. L., Malpass, R. S., & Köhnken, G. (Eds.). (1996). Psychological issues in eyewitness identification, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
26. Steblay, N. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 413-424.
27. Thompson, C. P., Herrmann, D. J., Read, J. D., Bruce, D., Payne, D. G., & Toglia, M. P. (1998). Eyewitness memory: Theoretical and applied perspectives, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Tollestrup, P. A., Turtle, J. W., & Yuille, J. C. (1994). Actual victims and witnesses to robbery and fraud: An archival analysis. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 144-162). New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. van Koppen, P. J., & Lochun, S. K. (1997). Portraying perpetrators: The validity of offender descriptions by witnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 661-685.
30. Wixted, J., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1991). On the form of forgetting. Psychological Science, 2, 409-415.
31. Woolnough, P. S., & MacLeod, M. D. (2001). Watching the birdie watching you: Eyewitness memory for actions using CCTV recording of actual crimes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 395-411.
32. Yuille, J. C., & Cutshall, J. L. (1986). A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 291-301.
33. Yuille, J. C., & Wells, G. L. (1991). Concerns about the application of research findings: The issue of ecological validity. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections: Implications for eyewitness testimony (pp. 118-128). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.