Rhythm classification using reconstructed phase space of signal frequency sub-bands

Computers in Cardiology

Volumn 30, Issue , 2003, Pages 61-64

  Roberts, Felice M ^a,b   Povinelli, Richard J ^a,b   Ropella, Kristina M ^a,c  

^a MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Marquette University   (United States)

^c Marquette University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BANDWIDTH; CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; DIAGNOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL FILTERING AND PREDICTION;

ATRIAL ARRHYTHMIAS; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; RECONSTRUCTIVE PHASE SPACES (RPS); SIGNAL FREQUENCY;

CARDIOLOGY;

EID: 4143103547     PISSN: 02766574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/cic.2003.1291090     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. 2002 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2001.
2. Lauer MS, Eagle KA. Atrial Fibrillation Following Cardiac Surgery. In: Falk RH, Podrid PJ, editors. Atrial Fibrillation Mechanisms and Management. New York: Raven Press, Ltd.; 1992. p. 127-143.
3. Jenkins J, Noh KH, Gezennec A, Bump T, Arzbaecher R. Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation Using Electrograms from Chronic Leads: Evaluation of Computer Algorithms. PACE 1988; 11:622-31.
4. Slocum J, Sahakian AV, Swiryn S. Computer Discrimination of Atrial Fibrillation and Regular Atrial Rhythms from Intra-Atrial Electrograms. PACE 1988;11:610-21.
5. Rojo-Alvarez JL, Arenal-Maiz A, Artes-Rodríguez A. Discriminating between supraventricular and ventricular tachycardias from EGM onset analysis: Support vector preprocessing and incremental learning approaches for increased sensitivity and specificity of ICDs. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 2002;21(1):16-26.
6. Chen S-A, Tai C-T, Chiang C-E, Chang M-S. Role of the Surface Electrocardiogram in the Diagnosis of Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia. Cardiology Clinics 1997;15(4):539-65.
7. Whitney H. Differentiable Manifolds. The Annals of Mathematics, 2nd Series 1936;37(3):645-680.
8. Takens F. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In: Dold A, Eckman B, editors. Dynamical Systems and Turbulence; 1980; Warwick: Springer-Verlag; 1980. p. 366-381.
9. Sauer T, Yorke JA, Casdagli M. Embedology. Journal of Statistical Physics 1991;65(3/4):579-616.
10. Roberts FM, Povinelli RJ, Ropella KM. Identification of ECG Arrhythmias using Phase Space Reconstruction. In: DeRaedt L, Siebes A, editors. Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (PKDD'0l); 2001; Freiburg, Germany: Springer Verlag; 2001. p. 411-423.
11. Ropella KM, Saad ZS. Quantitative Descriptions of Cardiac Arrhythmias. In: Cabo C, Rosenbaum DS, editors. Quantitative Cardiac Electrophysiology. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2002. p. 429-506.
12. Thakor NV, Webster JG, Tompkins WJ. Optimal QRS detector. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 1983:343-50.
13. Povinelli RJ, Roberts FM, Ropella KM, Johnson MT. Are Nonlinear Ventricular Arrhythmia Characteristics Lost, As Signal Duration Decreases? In: Computers in Cardiology; 2002; Memphis, Tennessee: IEEE; 2002. p. 221-224.