Do anesthesia information systems increase malpractice exposure? Results of a survey

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 840-843

  Feldman, Jeffrey M ^a,b  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EXPERIENCE; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; LAW SUIT; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK REDUCTION;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MALPRACTICE;

EID: 4143100432     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130259.52838.3B     Document Type: Review

References (3)

1. Cook RI, McDonald J, Nunziata E. Differences between hand-written and automatic blood pressure records. Anesthesiology 1989;71:385.
2. Eichhorn JH. Disadvantages of automated anesthesia records. In: Gravenstein JS, Holzer JF, eds. Safety and cost containment in anesthesia. Boston: Butterworths, 1988:223-32.
3. Whitcher C. Advantages of automated anesthesia records. In: Gravenstein JS, Holzer JF, eds. Safety and cost containment in anesthesia. Boston: Butterworths, 1988:207-21.