Total bladder replacement with de-epithelialized ileum. Experimental study in dogs

International Braz J Urol

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 237-244

  de Oliveira Vilar, Fábio O ^a,b   De Araújo, Luiz A P ^a   Lima, Salvador V C ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bladder; Epithelium; Ileum; Prostheses and implants

Indexed keywords

GENTAMICIN; NITROFURANTOIN; SILICONE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; ARTICLE; BLADDER BIOPSY; BLADDER CAPACITY; BLADDER EPITHELIUM; BLADDER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTECTOMY; CYSTOGRAPHY; CYSTOMETRY; DOG; EPITHELIZATION; FEMALE; ILEUM GRAFT; INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 4143091605     PISSN: 16775538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382004000300013     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Simon J: Ectopia vesica; operation for temporary success; autopsy. Lancet. 1852; 2: 568-70.
2. Mikulicz J: Zur Operation der angeborenen. Belsanesn plate. Zentralb Chir. 1899; 26: 641-3.
3. Leong CH, Ong GB: Gastrcystoplasty in dogs. Aust N Z J Surg. 1972; 41: 272-9.
4. Nurse DE, Mundy AR: Metabolic complications of cystoplasty. Br J Urol. 1989; 63: 165-8.
5. Shoemaker WC: Reversed seromuscular grafts in urinary tract reconstruction. J Urol. 1955; 74: 453-75.
6. Filmer RB, Spencer JR: Malignancies in bladder augmentations and intestinal conduits. J Urol. 1990; 143: 671-8.
7. Martin LSJ: Uroepithelial lined ileal segment as a bladder replacement, experimental observations and brief review of literature. J Urol. 1959; 82: 633.
8. Dewan PA, Lorenz C, Stefanek W, Byard RW: Urothelial lined colocystoplasty in a sheep model. Eur Urol. 1994; 26: 240-6.
9. Buson H, Manivel JC, Dayan CM, Long R, Gonzalez R: Seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium: experimental study. Urology. 1994; 44: 743-8.
10. Lutz N, Frey P: Enterocystoplasty using modified pedicled, detubularized, de-epithelialized sigmoid patches in the mini-pig model. J Urol 1995; 154: 893-8.
11. Duel BP, Gonzalez R, Barthold JS: Alternatives techniques for augmentation cystoplasty. J Urol. 1998; 159: 998-1005.
12. Lima SV, Araujo LA, Montoro M, Maciel A, Vilar FO: The use of demucosalized bowel to augment small contracted bladders. Br J Urol. 1998; 82: 436-9.
13. Jednak R, Schimke CM, Barroso JR U, Barthold JS, González R: Further experience with seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium. J Urol. 2000; 164: 2045-9.
14. Merguerian P, Chavez DR, Hakim S: Grafting of cultured uroepithelium and bladder mucosa into de-epithelialized segments of colon in rabbits. J Urol. 1994; 152: 671-4.
15. Frey P, Lutz N, Leuba AL: Augmentation cystoplasty using pedicled and de-epithelialized gastric patches in the mini-pig model. Urol. 1997; 156: 608-13.
16. Aktu T, Zdem RTÖ, Aartan C, Özer E, Olguner M, Akgür FM: Experimetally prefabricated bladder. J Urol. 2001; 165: 2055-8.