Self-reported mental health among US military personnel prior and subsequent to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 46, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 775-782

  Smith, Tyler C ^a   Smith, Besa ^a   Corbeil, Thomas E ^a   Riddle, James R ^b   Ryan, Margaret A K ^a  

^a NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL ABUSE; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EMOTIONAL DISORDER; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PANIC; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOLDIER; SOMATOFORM DISORDER; TERRORISM; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; MILITARY PERSONNEL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; TERRORISM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 4143091559     PISSN: 10762752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000135545.51183.ad     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Schuster MA, Stein BD, Jaycox L, et al. A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks (comment). N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1507-1512.
2. Hammond J, Brooks J. The World Trade Center attack. Helping the helpers: the role of critical incident stress management (comment). Critical Care (Lond). 2001;5:315-317.
3. Hoge CW, Orman DT, Robichaux RJ, et al. Operation Solace: overview of the mental health intervention following the September 11, 2001 Pentagon attack. Mil Med. 2002;167(9 Suppl):44-47.
4. Ritchie EC. Introduction: the mental health response to the September 11th attack on the Pentagon. Mil Med. 2002;167(4Suppl):1-2.
5. Hoge CW, Engel CC, Orman DT, et al. Development of a brief questionnaire to measure mental health outcomes among Pentagon employees following the September 11, 2001 attack. Mil Med. 2002;167(9 Suppl):60-63.
6. Cardenas J, Williams K, Wilson JP, Fanouraki G, Singh A. PSTD, major depressive symptoms, and substance abuse following September 11, 2001, in a Midwestern university population. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2003;5:15-28.
7. DeLisi LE, Maurizio A, Yost M, et al. A survey of New Yorkers after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:780-783.
8. Franklin CL, Young D, Zimmerman M. Psychiatric patients' vulnerability in the wake of the September 11th terrorist attacks. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002;190:833-838.
9. Galea S, Vlahov D, Resnick H, et al. Trends of probable post-traumatic stress disorder in New York City after the September 11 terrorist attacks. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:514-524.
10. Kaplan Z, Iancu I, Bodner E. A review of psychological debriefing after extreme stress. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:824-827.
11. McFarlane AC. Long-term psychiatric morbidity after a natural disaster. Implications for disaster planners and emergency services. Med J Aust. 1986;145:561-563.
12. Ford CA, Udry JR, Gleiter K, Chantala K. Reactions of young adults to September 11, 2001. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:572-578.
13. Wolinsky FD, Wyrwich KW, Kroenke K, Babu AN, Tierney WM. 9-11, personal stress, mental health, and sense of control among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003;58:S146-S150.
14. Williams DA, Brown SC, Clauw DJ, Gendreau RM. Self-reported symptoms before and after September 11 in patients with fibromyalgia. JAMA. 2003;289:1637-1638.
15. Gray GC, Chesbrough KB, Ryan MAK, et al. The Millennium Cohort Study: a 21-year prospective cohort study of 140,000 military personnel. Mil Med. 2002;167:483-488.
16. DoD Occupational Conversion Manual: Enlisted/Officer/Civilian. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Force Management and Personnel; 1991.
17. Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 Study. JAMA. 1994;272:1749-1756.
18. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary care evaluation of mental disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA. 1999;282:1737-1744.
19. Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, Hornyak R, McMurray J. Validity and utility of the PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire in assessment of 3000 obstetric-gynecologic patients: the PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire Obstetrics-Gynecology Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:759-769.
20. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated; 2000.
21. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): L conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
22. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:258-266.
23. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr Ann. 2002;32:509-521.
24. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606-613.
25. Ware JE, Davies-Avery A, Brook RH. Conceptualization and measurement of health for adults in the Health Insurance Study. Volume VI: Analysis of relationships among health status measures. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation; Publication no. R-1987/5-HEW 1980.
26. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care. 1988;26:724-735.
27. Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD, et al. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study (erratum appears in JAMA. 1989;262:2542). JAMA. 1989;262:907-913.
28. Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD, et al. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study (erratum appears in JAMA. 1989;262:2542). JAMA. 1989;262:907-913.