Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of intracranial meningioma: Comparison of distributed and compartmental tracer kinetic models - Initial results

Radiology

Volumn 232, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 921-930

  Cheong, L H Dennis ^a   Lim, C C Tchoyoson ^b   Koh, Tong San ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Brain neoplasms, CT; Brain, perfusion; Computed tomography (CT), contrast enhancement; Computed tomography (CT), functional imaging; Meninges, neoplasms; Model, mathematical

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOHEXOL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARTMENT MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRACRANIAL TUMOR; KINETICS; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MENINGIOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; MENINGEAL NEOPLASMS; MENINGIOMA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 4143082487     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2323031198     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Turetschek K, Huber S, Floyd E, et al. MR imaging characterization of microvessels in experimental breast tumors by using a particulate contrast agent with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2001; 218:562-569.
2. Ludemann L, Grieger W, Wurm R, Budzisch M, Hamm B, Zimmer C. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with WHO tumor grading for gliomas. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1231-1241.
3. Padhani AR, Husband JE. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies in oncology with an emphasis on quantification, validation and human studies. Clin Radiol 2001; 56:607-620.
4. DeVries AF, Griebel J, Kremser C, et al. Tumor microcirculation evaluated by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging predicts therapy outcome for primary rectal carcinoma. Cancer Res 2001; 61:2513-2516.
5. Lyng H, Vorren AO, Sundfor K, et al. Assessment of tumor oxygenaticn in human cervical carcinoma by use of dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14:750-756.
6. Yamashita Y, Baba T, Baba Y, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of uterine cervical cancer: pharmacokinetic analysis with histopathologic correlation and its importance in predicting the outcome of radiation therapy. Radiology 2000; 216:803-809.
7. Uematsu H, Maeda M, Sadato N, et al. Vascular permeability: quantitative measurement with double-echo dynamic MR imaging-theory and clinical application. Radiology 2000; 214:912-927.
8. Cooper RA, Carrington BM, Loncaster JA, et al. Tumour oxygenation levels correlate with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters in carcinoma of the cervix. Rad other Oncol 2000; 57:53-59.
9. Gong QY, Brunt JN, Romaniul CS, et al. Contrast enhanced dynamic MRI of cervical carcinoma during radiotherapy: early prediction of tumour regression rate. Br J Radiol 1999; 72:1177-1184.
10. Hoskin PJ, Saunders MI, Goodchild K, Powell ME, Taylor NJ, Baddeley H. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance scanning as a predictor of response to accelerated radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer. Br J Radiol 1999; 72:1093-1098.
11. Mayr NA, Hawighorst H, Yuh WT, Essig M, Magnotta VA, Knopp MV. MR microcirculation assessment in cervical cancer: correlations with histomorphological tumor markers and clinical outcome. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:267-276.
12. Taylor JS, Tofts PS, Port R, et al. MR imaging of tumor microcirculation: promise for the new millennium. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:903-907.
13. Andersen C, Jensen FT. Differences in blood-tumour-barrier leakage of human intracranial tumours: quantitative monitoring of vasogenic oedema and its response to glucocorticoid treatment. Acta Neurochir (Vienna) 1998; 140:919-924.
14. Griebel J, Mayr NA, De Vries A, et al. Assessment of tumor microcirculation: a new role of dynamic contrast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:111-119.
15. Rijpkema M, Kaanders JH, Joosten FB, Kogel AJ, Heerschap A. Method for quantitative mapping of dynamic MRI contrast agent uptake in human tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14:457-463.
16. Koh TS, Zeman V, Darko J, et al. The inclusion of capillary distribution in the adiabatic tissue homogeneity model of blood flow. Phys Med Biol 2001; 46:1519-1538.
17. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211:101-110.
18. Brix G, Bahner ML, Hoffmann U, Horvath A, Schreiber W. Regional blood flow, capillary permeability, and compartmental volumes: measurement with dynamic CT-initial experience. Radiology 1999; 210:269-276.
19. Knopp MV, Weiss E, Sinn HP, et al. Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:260-266.
20. Port RE, Knopp MV, Hoffmann U, Milker-Zabel S, Brix G. Multicomparmental analysis of gadolinium chelate kinetics: blood-tissue exchange in mammary tumors as monitored by dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:233-241.
21. Barbier EL, Den Boer JA, Peters AR, Rozeboom AR, Sau J, Bonmartin A. A model of the dual effect of gadopentetate dimeglumine on dynamic brain MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:242-253.
22. Hulka CA, Edmister WB, Smith BL, et al. Dynamic echo-planar imaging of the breast: experience in diagnosing breast carcinoma and correlation with tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1997; 205:837-842.
23. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1996; 200:639-649.
24. Tofts PS, Berkowitz B, Schnall MD. Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33:564-568.
25. Hulka CA, Smith BL, Sgroi DC, et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 197:33-38.
26. Yeung WT, Lee TY, Del Maestro RF, Kozak R, BennettJD. Effect of steroids on iopamidol blood-brain transfer constant and plasma volume in brain tumors measured with x-ray computed tomography. J Neurooncol 1994; 18:53-60.
27. Johnson JA, Wilson TA. A model for capillary exchange. Am J Physiol 1966; 210:1299-1303.
28. Larson KB, Markham J, Raichle ME. Tracer-kinetic models for measuring cerebral blood flow using externally detected radiotracers. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1987; 7:443-463.
29. St Lawrence KS, Lee T. An adiabatic approximation to the tissue homogeneity model for water exchange in the brain. I. Theoretical derivation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998; 18:1365-1377.
30. Koh TS, Cheong LH, Hou Z, Soh YC. A physiologic model of capillary-tissue exchange for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of tumor microcirculation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003; 50:159-167.
31. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusible tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:223-232.
32. Lee TY. Functional CT: physiological models. Trends Biotechnol 2002; 20 (suppl 8):S3-S10.
33. Muzic RF Jr, Saidel GM. Distributed versus compartment models for PET receptor studies. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003; 22:11-21.
34. Bevington PR. Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1969.
35. Nabavi DG, Cenic A, Craen RA, et al. CT assessment of cerebral perfusion: experimental validation and initial clinical experience. Radiology 1999; 213:141-149.
36. Eastwood JD, Lev MH, Azhari T, et al. CT perfusion scanning with deconvolution analysis: pilot study in patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Radiology 2002; 222:227-236.
37. Ostergaard L, Sorensen AG, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. II. Experimental comparison and preliminary results. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:726-736.
38. Renkin EM. Transport of potassium-42 from blood to tissue in isolated mammalian skeletal muscles. Am J Physiol 1959; 197:1205-1210.
39. Crone C. The permeability of capillaries in various organs as determined by use of the indicator-dilution method. Acta Physiol Scand 1963; 58:292-305.