Effectiveness of a quit and win contest with a low-income population

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 543-550

  Hahn, Ellen J ^a,b   Rayens, Mary Kay ^a,c   Chirila, Costel ^a   Riker, Carol A ^a   Paul, Todd P ^a   Warnick, Todd A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^d Lexington Fayette Co Hlth Dept   (United States)

Author keywords

Population based; Smoking cessation; Tobacco use

Indexed keywords

COTININE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MALE; MARRIAGE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; SMOKING CESSATION; SMOKING HABIT; URINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POVERTY; PROBABILITY; RECURRENCE; REFERENCE VALUES; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 4143078058     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Benefits of Smoking Cessation: A Report of the Surgeon General [DHHS Publication No. CDC 90-8416]. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office; 1990.
2. Kiefe C.I., Williams O.D., Lewis C.E., et al. Ten-year changes in smoking among young adults: are radical differences explained by socioeconomic factors in the CARDIA study? Am. J. Public Health. 91:2001;213-218
3. Centers for Disease Control. Cigarette smoking among adults - United States, 2000. MMWR. 51:2002;642-645
4. Flint A.J., Novotny T.E. Poverty status and cigarette smoking prevalence and cessation in the United States, 1983-1993: the independent risk of being poor. Tob. Control. 6:1997;14-18
5. Schauffler H.H., Barker D.C., Orleans C.T. State report: Medicaid coverage for tobacco dependence treatments. Health Aff. 20:2001 (January/February);298-303
6. Linstrom M., Hanson B.S., Ostergren P., Berglund G. Socioeconomic differences in smoking cessation: the role of social participation. Scand. J. Public Health. 28:2000;200-208
7. Monso E., Campbell J., Tonnesen P., Gustavsson G. Morera. Sociodemographic predictors of success in smoking intervention. Tob. Control. 10:2001;165-169
8. Benowitz N.J. Smoking cessation trials targeted to racial and economic minority groups. JAMA. 288:2002;497-499
9. Croghan I.T., O'Hara M.R., Schoeder D.R., et al. A community-wide smoking cessation program: quit and win 1998 in Olmsted County. Prev. Med. 33:2001;229-238
10. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Reducing tobacco use among youth: community-based approaches. Prevention Enhancement Protocols System (PEPS). Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1997. pp. 97-3146. DHHS Publication No. (SMA).
11. Lando H.A., Pirie P.L., Dusich K.H., et al. Community incorporation of quit and win contests in Bloomington MN. Am. J. Public Health. 85:1995;263-264
12. Lai K.Q., McPhee S.J., Jenkins C.N.H., Wong C. Applying the quit and win contest model in the Vietnamese community in Santa Clara county. Tob. Control. 9(Suppl. 2):2000;56-59
13. Bains N., Pickett W., Hoey J. The use and impact of incentives in population-based smoking cessation programs: a review. Am. J. Health Promot. 12:1998;307-320
14. Korhonen T., Urjanheimo E., Mannonen P., et al. Quit and win campaigns as a long-term anti-smoking intervention in North Karelia and other parts of Finland. Tob. Control. 8:1999;175-181
15. Curry S., Ludman E., Graham E., Stout J., Grothaus L., Lozano P. Pediatric-based smoking cessation intervention for low-income women. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 157:2003;295-302
16. Fiore M.C., Bailey W.C., Cohen S.J., et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence. Clinical practice guideline. Public Health Service. 2000 (June);1-175 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville (MD)
17. National Cancer Institute. Population-based smoking cessation: proceedings of a conference on what works to influence cessation in the general populations. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 12. Bethesda (MD): U.S. Public Health and Human Service, National Institute of Health, National Cancer Institute, NIH Pub. No. 00-4892; 2000 (November).
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. NHDS; 1999. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/brfss/.
19. Substance Abuse and Health Services Administration. Results from the 2001 national household survey on drug abuse. Summary of national findings, vol. 1. Rockville (MD): Office of Applied Studies, NHSDA Series H-17, DHHS Pub. No. 02-3758; 2002.
20. Sackett D.L., Gent M. Controversy in counting and attributing events in clinical trials. NEJM. 301(26):1979;1410-1412
21. Etter J.F., Perneger T.V. A comparison of two measures of stage of change for smoking cessation. Addiction. 94:1999;1881-1890
22. Stokes M.E., Davis C.S., Koch G.G. Categorical data analysis using the SAS system. Second ed.:2000;SAS Institute, Cary (NC)
23. Di Clemente C.C., Prochaska J.O., Fairhurst S.K., et al. The process of smoking cessation: an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. J. Consult Clin. Psychol. 59:1991;295-304
24. Pickett W., Bains N. Staging of adult smokers according to the transtheoretical model of behavioural change: analysis of an Eastern Ontario cohort. Can. J. Public Health. 89:1998;37-42
25. El-Bastawissi A.Y., McAfee T., Zbikowski S.M., Hollis J., Stark M., Wassum K., et al. The uninsured and Medicaid Oregon tobacco user experience in a real world, phone based cessation programme. Tob. Control. 12:2003;45-51
26. Stewart M.J., Gillis A., Brosky G., Johnston G., Kirkland S., Leigh G., et al. Smoking among disadvantaged women: causes and cessation. Can. J. Nurs. Res. 28:1996;41-60
27. Lillington L., Royce J., Novak D., Ruvalcaba M., Chlebowski R. Evaluation of a smoking cessation program for pregnant minority women. Cancer Pract. 3:1995;157-163