Comparison of alarm strategies for continuous 12-lead ST-segment monitoring

Computers in Cardiology

Volumn 30, Issue , 2003, Pages 809-812

  Wang, John Y ^a   Saenz, M C ^a   Horacek B M ^b  

^a PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALARM SYSTEMS; BLOOD VESSELS; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DETECTORS; DISEASE CONTROL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEALTH RISKS; PATIENT MONITORING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ALARM STRATEGIES; BALLOON OCCLUSIONS; REVASCULARIZATION; ST-SEGMENT MONITORING;

CARDIOLOGY;

EID: 4143063804     PISSN: 02766574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/cic.2003.1291280     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Crawford MH, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography. J Am Col Cardiol 1999;34:912-948.
2. Drew BJ, Krucoff MW. Multilead ST-Segment Monitoring in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Consensus Statement for Healthcare Professionals. Am J of Crit Care 1999;8:372-388.
3. Wang JY. Noise Stress Testing for Real-Time ST-Segment Measurement Algorithms: A New Methodology. Computers in Cardiology 2000;27:845-848.
4. Ryan TJ, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Col Cardiol 1996;28:1328-1428.
5. Horáček BM, et al. Optimal Electrocardiographic Leads for Detecting Acute Myocardial Ischemia. J Electrocardiol 2001;34(Suppl):97-111.
6. Mirvis DM, et al. Instrumentation and Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Special Care Units. Circulation 1989;79:464-471.