Impacts of CAD on design realization

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 284-291

  De Lapp, James A ^a   Ford, David N ^a   Bryant, John A ^a   Horlen, Joe ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer aided design; Construction operations; Design and development

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; CONTRACTS; COSTS; DATA TRANSFER; ENGINEERS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN REALIZATION; INFORMATION TRANSFER;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

EID: 4143060657     PISSN: 09699988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09699980410547630     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. American Institute of Architects (AIA) (1997), General Conditions of the Contract for Construction (A201-1997). Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect (AIA B141-1997), Washington, DC.
2. Construction Industry Institute (CII) Design Task Force (1987), Input variables impacting design effectiveness (Publication 8-2), University of Texas at Austin, Texas.
3. Glavinich, T.E. (1995), "Improving constructability during design phase", Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 73-6.
4. Hart, R.D. (1994), Quality Handbook for the Architectural, Engineering, and Construction Company, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.
5. Khanzode, A.R. and Fischer, M. (2000), "Potential savings from standardized electronic information exchange: a case study for the steel structure of a medical office building", Technical Report #121, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
6. Master Builder 2010 (2003), "Integrated design to fabrication (WWW document)", URL available at: www.mb2010.com/research/i_design_fab.html
7. Middlebrook, M. (1991), "Legal conundrums in electronic drawing exchange (WWW document)", URL available at: www.markcad.com/autocad/- eleccdwgexchange.htm
8. Patterson, T.L. (2002), Architect's Studio Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
9. Peck, B. (2001), Choosing the Best Delivery Method for your Facility Project (WWW document), URL available at: www.cmaanet.org/artides/ choosing_the_best_delivery-_metho.htm
10. Pietroforte, R. (1997), "Shop drawing process of stone veneered cladding systems", Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 70-9.
11. Pollalis, S.N. (1997), "Computing in the building process (WWW document)", URL available at: www.gsd.harvard.edu/~pollaris/papers/boss.pdf
12. Post, N.M. (2000), "No stamp of approval on building plans (Special report)", Engineering News Record, Vol. 244 No. 17, pp. 34-46.
13. Schinnerer, V.O. (2002), "Electronic information transfer issues (WWW document)", URL available at: www.schinnerer.com/risk_mgmt/private/ design_firms/mrtcl/pdfs/-electron.pdf
14. Singer, E.L. (2003), "Shopping for liability (WWW document)", URL available at: www.-aepronet.org/td/es10.html