The complex interactions of markets for endangered species products

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 926-953

  Fischer, Carolyn ^a  

^a RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Black markets; CITES; D11; Endangered species; K42; Poaching; Q21; Stigma

Indexed keywords

COSTS; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MARKETING;

COMPLEX INTERACTIONS; ENDANGERED SPECIES PRODUCTS;

BIODIVERSITY;

CITES; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; SPECIES CONSERVATION; TRADE POLICY; TRADE-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS;

EID: 4143057095     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2003.12.003     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. D. Andrew, Experience with the Use of Trade Measures in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), OECD/GD(97)106, OECD, Paris, 1997.
2. E.B. Barbier, T.M. Swanson, Ivory: the case against the ban, New Scientist (November 17, 1990) 52-54.
3. Bergstrom T. On the economics of crime and confiscation. J. Econ. Perspect. 4(3):1990;8-171
4. Brown G., Layton D.F. A market solution for preserving biodiversity: the black rhino. Shogren J., Tschirhart J. Protecting Endangered Species in the United States: Biological Needs, Political Realities, Economic Choices. 2001;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
5. Bulte E.H., van Kooten G.C. Economics of antipoaching enforcement and the ivory trade ban? Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 81(2):1999;66-453
6. CITES, Amendments to Appendices I and II of the Convention (Provisional List), UNEP-CITES, Santiago, Chile, November 15, 2002.
7. Dobbs I.M. Litter and waste management:disposal taxes vs. user charges. Can. J. Econ. 24(1):1991;27-221
8. Fullerton D., Kinnaman T.C. Garbage, recycling and illicit burning or dumping. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 29(1):1995;78-91
9. Greenwire, Ivory Sales did not Increase Poaching - CITES, March 30, 2000, Washington, DC: E&E Publishing, LLC.
10. J. Hastie, J. Newmann, M. Rice, Back in business: elephant poaching and the ivory black markets of Asia, EIA Report, Environmental Investigation Agency, London, 2002.
11. Heltberg R. Impact of the ivory trade ban on poaching incentives. a numerical example Ecolog. Econ. 36(2):2001;189-196
12. Japan Wildlife Conservation Society, Effect of Resumption of International Trade on Japanese Ivory Market, Tokyo, Japan, 1999.
13. Kremer M., Morcom C. Elephants. Amer. Econ. Rev. 90(1):2000;212-239
14. V. Menon, A. Kumar, Signed and sealed: the fate of the Asian elephant, Technical Report No. 5, Asian Elephant Research and Conservation Centre, 1998.
15. T. Milliken, African Elephants and the Eleventh Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES, TRAFFIC Network Briefing Document, TRAFFIC International, Cambridge, 2000.
16. Nechyba T.J. Social approval, values, and AFDC. a reexamination of the illegitimacy debate J. Polit. Econ. 109(3):2001;72-637
17. A. Thornton, C. Perry, J. Ruhfus, M. Powell, D. Bell, Lethal experiment: how the CITES-approved ivory sale led to increased elephant poaching, EIA Report, London, UK: Environmental Investigation Agency, 2000.