Role of natural enemies and other factors in the dynamics of field populations of the whitefly Siphoninus phillyreae (haliday) in introduced and native environments

Biological Control

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 199-209

  Gerling, Dan ^a   Rottenberg, Omer ^a   Bellows, Tom S ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aleurodidae; Ash whitefly; Biological control; Encarsia inaron; Life tables; Reproductive rates; Siphoninus phillyreae; Whitefly

Indexed keywords

ALEYRODIDAE; ARTHROPODA; ENCARSIA; ENCARSIA INARON; FRAXINUS; SIPHONINUS PHILLYREAE; VESPIDAE;

EID: 4143051521     PISSN: 10499644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bartlett B.R., van den Bosch R. Foreign exploration for beneficial organisms. DeBach P. Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. 1964;283-304 Reinhold, New York
2. Bellows T.S., Paine T.D., Arakawa K.Y., Meisenbacher C., Leddy P.M., Kabashima J. Biological control sought for ash whitefly. California Agriculture. 44:1990;4-6
3. Bellows T.S., Paine T.D., Gould J.R., Bezark L.G., Ball J.C., Bentley W., Coviello R., Downer J., Elam P., Flaherty D., Gouveia P., Koehler K., Molinar R., O'Connell N., Perry E., Vogel G. Biological control of ash whitefly: a success in progress. California Agriculture. 46:1992;24-25. 27-28
4. DeBach P., Rosen D. Biological Control by Natural Enemies. 1991;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 440
5. Ehler L.E. Introduction strategies in biological control of insects. Mackauer M., Ehler L.E., Roland J. Critical Issues in Biological Control, Intercept. 1990;111-143 Andover, UK
6. Elkinton J.S., Puonaccorsi J.P., Bellows T.S., Van Driesche R.G. Marginal attack rate, k-values and density dependence in the analysis of contemporaneous mortality factors. Res. Popul. Ecol. 34:1992;29-44
7. Gelman D.B., Blackburn M.B., Hu J.S., Gerling D. Timing and regulation of molting/metamorphosis in the whitefly: cues for the development of its parasitoid, Encarsia formosa. Konopinska D. Symposium Proceedings: Arthropods, Chemical, Physiological and Environmental Aspects. 2001;11-21 Wroclaw, Poland
8. Gerling D. Approaches to the biological control of whiteflies. Florida Entomol. 75:1992;446-456
9. Gould J.R., Bellows T.S., Paine T.D. Evaluation of biological control of Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday) by the parasitoid Encarsia partenopea. Biol. Control. 2:1992;257-265
10. Gould J.R., Bellows T.S., Paine T.D. Preimaginal development, adult longevity and fecundity of Encarsia inaron (Hym.: Aphelinidae) parasitizing Siphoninus phillyreae (Hom.: Aleyrodidae) in California. Entomophaga. 40:1995;1-14
11. Guershon M., Gerling D. Defense of a sessile host against parasitoids: Aleyrodes singularis vs. Encarsia spp. Norwegian J. Agric. Sci. 16:1994;255-260
12. Horowitz A.R., Podoler H., Gerling D. Life table analysis of the tobacco whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in cotton fields in Israel. Acta Oecol. Oec. Appl. 5:1984;221-223
13. Huffaker, K.B., Luck, R.F., Messenger, P.S., 1977. The ecological basis for biological control. In: Proceeding of the XV International Congress of Entomology, August, 1976, Washington, DC, pp. 560-586
14. Leddy P.M., Paine T.D., Bellows T.S. Biology of Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and its relationship to temperature. Environ. Entomol. 24:1995;380-386
15. Manzari S., Polaszek A., Belshaw R., Quicke D.L.J. Morphometric and molecular analysis of the Encarsia inaron species-group (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), parasitoids of whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleurodidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 92:2002;165-175
16. Murdoch W.W. The relevance of pest enemy models to biological control. Mackauer M., Ehler L.E., Roland J. Critical Issues in Biological Control, Intercept. 1990;1-24 Andover, UK
17. Polaszek A., Evans G.A., Bennett F.D. Encarsia parasitoids of Bemisia tabaci. (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae, Homoptera: Aleyrodidae): a preliminary guide to identification. Bull. Entomol. Res. 82:1992;375-392
18. SAS Institute, 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide.6.03 edition. SAS Institute Inc, Carey, NC
19. Shimron O., Hefets A., Gerling D. Arrestment responses of Eretmocerus species and Encarsia deserti (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae) to Bemisia tabaci honeydew. J. Insect Behav. 5:1992;517-526
20. Stilling P. Why do natural enemies fail in classical biological control programs? Am. Entomol. 39:1993;31-37
21. Van Driesche R.G., Bellows T.S. Biological Control. 1996;Chapman & Hall, New York
22. Varley, G.C., Gradwell, G.R., 1968. Population models for the winter moth. In: Southwood, T.R.E. (Ed.), Insect Abundance. Symposium of the Royal Entomol. Soc. 4, pp. 132-142
23. Waage J.K. Ecological theory and the selection of biological control agents. Mackauer M., Ehler L.E., Roland J. Critical Issues in Biological Control, Intercept. 1990;135-158 Andover, UK