A phylogeny of Urophylleae (Rubiaceae) based on rps16 intron data

Taxon

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 24-32

  Smedmark, Jenny E E ^a   Rydin, Catarina ^a   Razafimandimbison, Sylvain G ^a   Khan, Saleh A ^b   Liede Schumann, Sigrid ^b   Bremer, Birgitta ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Molecular phylogenetics; Pentaloncha; Pleiocarpidia; Poecilocalyx; Temnopteryx; Urophylleae

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY; VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION;

AMPHIDASYA; MASCHALOCORYMBUS; PAURIDIANTHA; PRARAVINIA; PRAVINARIA; RARITEBE; RUBIACEAE; RUBIOIDEAE; STELECHANTHA; UROPHYLLEAE; UROPHYLLUM;

EID: 41349123506     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Pp. 267-281 in: Petrov, B.N. & Csaki, F. (eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
2. Andersson, L. 1996. Circumscription of the tribe Isertieae (Rubiaceae). Opera Bot. Belg. 7: 139-164.
3. Andersson, L. & Rova, J.H.E. 1999. The rps16 intron and the phylogeny of the Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 214: 161-186.
4. Bremekamp, C.E.B. 1952. The African species of Oldenlandia L. sensu Hiern et K. Schumann. Verh. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Afd. Natuurk., Sect. 2 18: 1-297.
5. Bremekamp, C.E.B. 1966. Remarks on the position, the delimitation and the subdivision of the Rubiaceae. Acta Bot. Neerl. 15: 1-33.
6. Bremer, B. 1996. Phylogenetic studies within Rubiaceae and relationships with other families based on molecular data. Opera Bot. Belg. 7: 33-50.
7. Bremer, B., Andreasen, K. & Olsson, D. 1995. Subfamilial and tribal relationships in the Rubiaceae based on rbcL sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 383-397.
8. Bremer, B. & Manen, J.-F. 2000. Phylogeny and classification of the subfamily Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 225: 43-72.
9. Bremer, B. & Thulin, M. 1998. Collapse of Isertieae, re-establishment of Mussaendeae, and a new genus of Sabiceeae (Rubiaceae); phylogenetic relationships based on rbcL data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 211: 71-92.
10. Dessein, S., Andersson, L., Robbrecht, E. & Smets, E. 2001. Hekistocarpa (Rubiaceae): a member of an emended tribe Virectarieae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 229: 59-78.
11. Doyle, J.J. & Doyle, J.L. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13-15.
12. Felsenstein, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27: 401-410.
13. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
14. Govaerts, R. 2006. World Checklist of Rubiaceae. The Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published on the Internet: http://www.kew.org/wcsp/
15. Green, P. 1999. Phrap, vers. 0.990329. Available at: www.phrap.org
16. Green, P. & Ewing, B. 2002. Phred, vers. 0.020425c. Available at: www.phrap.org.
17. Hallé, F. 1961. Contribution a l'étude biologique et taxonomique des Mussaendeae (Rubiaceae) d'Áfrique tropicale. Adansonia 1: 266-298.
18. Hallé, N. 1966. Famille des Rubiacées (1re partie). Vol. 12 of: Aubréville, A. (ed.), Flore du Gabon. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Buffon, Paris.
19. Hooker, J.D. 1873. Rubiaceae. Pp. 7-151 in: Bentham, G. & Hooker, J.D. (eds.), Genera Plantarum. Reeve & Co., London.
20. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
21. Khan, S.A., Razafimandimison, S.G., Bremer, B. & Liede-Schumann, S. 2008. Sabiceeae and Virectarieae (Rubiaceae, Ixoroideae): one or two tribes? New tribal and generic circumscriptions of Sabiceeae and biogeography of Sabicea s.l. Taxon 57: 7-23.
22. Kiehn, M. 1995. Chromosome survey of the Rubiaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 398-408.
23. Kirkbride, M.C.G. 1979. Review of the neotropical Isertieae (Rubiaceae). Brittonia 31: 313-332.
24. Novotny, V., Basset, Y., Miller, S.E., Weiblen, G.D., Bremer, B., Cizek, L. & Drozd, P. 2002. Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature 416: 841-844.
25. Ntore, S., Robbrecht, E., Smets, E. & Dessein, S. 2003. Révision de Pauridiantha paucinervis (Rubiaceae-Pauridiantheae) et des espèces voisines. Belg. J. Bot. 136: 73-90.
26. Nylander, J.A.A. 2004. MrAIC.pl, version 1.4. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
27. Oxelman, B., Lidén, M. & Berglund, D. 1997. Chloroplast rps16 intron phytogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 184: 393-410.
28. Piesschaert, F., Andersson, L., Jansen, S., Dessein, S., Robbrecht, E. & Smets, E. 2000. Searching for the taxonomic position of the African genus Colletoecema (Rubiaceae): morphology and anatomy compared to an rps16-intron analysis of the Rubioideae. Canad. J. Bot. 78: 288-304.
29. Rambaut, A. 1996. Se-Al: Sequence Alignment Editor, version 2.0a11. Available at: http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/.
30. Robbrecht, E. 1988. Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Opera Bot. Belg. 1: 1-271.
31. Robbrecht, E. & Manen J.-F. 2006. The major evolutionary lineages of the coffee family (Rubiaceae, angiosperms). Combined analysis (nDNA and cpDNA) to infer the position of Coptosapelta and Luculia, and supertree construction based on rbcL, rps16, trnL-trnF and atpB-rbcL data. A new classification in two subfamilies, Cinchonoideae and Rubioideae. Syst. Geogr. Pl. 76: 85-146.
32. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
33. Schumann, K. 1891. Rubiaceae. Pp 1-156 in: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, part 4. W. Engelmann, Leipzig.
34. Schwartz, G. 1978. Estimating the dimensions of a model. Ann. Stat. 6: 461-464.
35. Staden, R., Beal, K.F. & Bonfield, J.K. 1998. The Staden Package. Pp. 115-130 in: Misener, S. & Krawetz, S.A. (eds.), Computer Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 132, Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols. The Humana Press Inc., Totowa.
36. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), ver. 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
37. Tavaré, S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Pp. 57-86 in: Miura, R.M. (ed.), Some Mathematical Questions in Biology -DNA Sequence Analysis. American Mathematical Society, Providence.
38. Verdcourt, B. 1958. Remarks on the classification of the Rubiaceae. Bull. Jard. Bot. État. Bruxelles 28: 209-290.