Quantum modes on chaotic motion: Analytically exact results

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2002, Pages

  Jain, Sudhir R ^a   Grémaud, Benoît ^b   Khare, Avinash ^c  

^a BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

^b LABORATOIRE KASTLER BROSSEL   (France)

^c INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; BROWNIAN MOVEMENT; DAMPING; DIFFUSION; POLYMERS; PROTEINS;

CELLULAR TRANSPORT; CYTOSKELETON FILAMENTS; OPTICAL TWEEZERS; THERMAL COLLISIONS;

CELLS;

EID: 41349118276     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.016216     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems (Cambridge University, New York, 1993).
2. J.R. Dorfman, An Introduction to Chaos in Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Cambridge University, New York, 1999).
3. M.C. Gutzwiller, Am. J. Phys. 66, 304(1997).
4. M.C. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990).
5. D. Delande, D. Sornette, and R.L. Weaver, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 1873 (1994).
6. T. Guhr, A. Müller-Groeling, and H.A. Weidenmüller, Phys. Rep. 299, 189 (1998).
7. M.V. Berry, J. Phys. A 10, 2083 (1977).
8. M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
9. S.R. Jain and D. Alonso, J. Phys. A 30, 4993 (1997).
10. E.J. Heller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1515 (1984).
11. L. Kaplan, Nonlinearity 12, R1 (1999).
12. L.P. Kadanoff, Phys. Today (53), 11 (2000).
13. P. Deift, Orthogonal Polynomials and Random Matrices: A Riemann-Hilbert Approach, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 3 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 2000).
14. M.L. Mehta, Random Matrices, 2nd ed. (Academic, London, 1991).
15. B. Grémaud and S.R. Jain, J. Phys. A 31, L637 (1998).
16. B. Shklovskii, B. Shapiro, B.R. Sears, P. Lambradines, and H.B. Shore, Phys. Rev. B 47, 11 487 (1993).
17. G. Date, S.R. Jain, and M.V.N. Murthy, Phys. Rev. E 51, 198 (1995).
18. E. Bogomolny, U. Gerland, and C. Schmit, Phys. Rev. E 59, R1315 (1999).
19. S.R. Jain and A. Khare, Phys. Lett. A 262, 35 (1999).
20. G. Auberson, S.R. Jain, and A. Khare, Phys. Lett. A 267, 293 (2000).
21. B. Eckhardt, J. Phys. A 19, 1823 (1986).
22. J.P. Keating, Nonlinearity 4, 309 (1991).
23. G. Auberson, S.R. Jain, and A. Khare, J. Phys. A 34, 695 (2001).
24. S. Rey and P. Choquard, Eur. J. Phys. 18, 94 (1997).
25. Occurrences of the latter case are systematically checked in our code and the corresponding trajectories are discarded.
26. From a numerical point of view, one should mention that the present trajectory alone can be followed up to time (Formula presented) without trouble and also that at (Formula presented), the symplectic structure has been preserved better than (Formula presented) (relative). Of course, these behaviors are not qualitatively modified on changing either initial conditions or energy.
27. More precisely, trajectories having initial conditions in the two largest areas will perform the collision (backward in time) before returning to PSOS, whereas other areas are images of these largest areas by the Poincaré map (backward in time).
28. M. Ezung, N. Gurappa, A. Khare, and P.K. Panigrahi, e-print cond-mat/0007005.
29. H.D. Parab and S.R. Jain, J. Phys. A 29, 3903 (1996).
30. (Formula presented)
31. D. Wojcik, I. Bialynicki-Birula, and K. Zyczkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5022 (2000).