Broken scaling in the forest-fire model

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2002, Pages

  Pruessner, Gunnar ^a   Jensen, Henrik Jeldtoft ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; OPTIMIZATION; VECTORS;

CORRELATION FUNCTIONS; LATTICE; RELAXATION; SELF-ORGANIZED CRITICALITY (SOC);

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 41349115690     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.056707     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. B. Drossel and F. Schwabl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1629 (1992).
2. H. J. Jensen, Self-Organized Criticality (Cambridge University Press, NY, 1998).
3. S. Clar, B. Drossel, and F. Schwabl, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 6803 (1996).
4. S. Clar, B. Drossel, and F. Schwabl, Phys. Rev. E 50, 1009 (1994).
5. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation Theory (Taylor & Francis, London, 1994).
6. A. Honecker and I. Peschel, Physica A 239, 509 (1997).
7. G. Pruessner and H. J. Jensen, (unpublished).
8. J. Hoshen and R. Kopelman, Phys. Rev. B 14, 3438 (1976).
9. M.EJ. Newman and R.M. Ziff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4104 (2000).
10. A. Honecker, Program for Simulating the Two-Dimensional Forest-Fire Model, http://www-public.tu-bs.de:8080/~honecker/software/forest2d.html.
11. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, NY, 1992).
12. K. Schenk, B. Drossel, and F. Schwabl (2001), e-print cond-mat/0105121.
13. K. Schenk, B. Drossel, S. Clar, and F. Schwabl, Eur. Phys. J. B 15, 177 (2000).
14. G. Pruessner, D. Loison, and K.-D. Schotte, Phys. Rev. B 64, 134414 (2001).
15. A.M. Ferrenberg, D.P. Landau, and K. Binder, J. Stat. Phys. 63, 867 (1991).
16. P. Grassberger, J. Phys. A 26, 2081 (1993).
17. M.F. Sykes and M. Glen, J. Phys. A 9, 87 (1976).
18. S. Mertens, J. Stat. Phys. 58, 1095 (1990).
19. As the standard deviation (actually the estimator of the standard deviation of the estimated mean; this quantity includes the correlation time) decreases with the square root of the computing time, one has to compare the products of the computing time and the square root of the standard deviation. In the algorithm presented here, the ratio of the computing time varies between 1.4 and 2.1.
20. Actually, it also differs from standard percolation because it fixes the number of occupied sites rather than simply the probability of being occupied. However, this difference becomes irrelevant for sufficiently large systems.
21. P. Grassberger, e-print cond-mat/0202022.