Transmission losses in left-handed materials

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 4-

  Markos P ^a   Rousochatzakis, I ^a   Soukoulis, C M ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEFT-HANDED (LH) MATERIALS; METALLIC COMPONENTS; TRANSMISSION LOSSES; VICINITY;

ABSORPTION; DATA REDUCTION; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE POLARIZATION; MAGNETIC PERMEABILITY; PERMITTIVITY; REFRACTIVE INDEX;

ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE TRANSMISSION;

ARTICLE;

EID: 41349112684     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.045601     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J.B. Pendry, A.J. Holden, D.J. Robbins and W.J. Stewart, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 47, 2075 (1999).
2. D.R. Smith, S. Schultz, N. Kroll, M. Sigalas, K.M. Ho, and C.M. Soukoulis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 645 (1994).
3. D.R. Smith, W.J. Padilla, D.C. Vier, S.C. Nemat-Nasser, and S. Schultz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4184 (2000);
4. R.A. Shelby, D.R. Smith, S.C. Nemat-Nasser, and S. Schultz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 489 (2001).
5. V.G. Veselago, Sov. Phys. Usp. 10, 509 (1968).
6. J.B. Pendry, Phys. World 13, 27 (2000);
7. J.B. PendryPhys. Today 53(5), 17 (2000).
8. J.B. Pendry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966 (2000).
9. D.R. Smith, S. Schultz, P. Markoš, and C.M. Soukoulis, Phys. Rev. B 65, 195104 (2002).
10. R.A. Shelby, D.R. Smith, and S. Schultz, Science 292, 77 (2001).
11. N. Garcia and M. Nieto-Vesperinas, Opt. Lett. 27, 885 (2002).
12. P.M. Valanju, R.M. Walser, and A.P. Valanju, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 187401 (2002).
13. N. Garcia and M. Nieto-Vesperinas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 207403 (2002).
14. L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskiĭ, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (Pergamon, New York, 1984).
15. J.B. Pendry, A.J. Holden, W.J. Stewart, and I. Youngs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4773 (1996);
16. A.K. Sarychev and V.M. Shalaev, e-print cond-mat/0103145.
17. P. Markoš and C.M. Soukoulis, Phys. Rev. E 65, 036622 (2002).
18. Let us note that we do not need (Formula presented) to be very small. Even for relatively high values of (Formula presented) there is still an appreciable amount of transmission through the LH structure (data not presented here).
19. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamic, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1999), p. 312.
20. For a given metallic frequency, transmission properties depend also on the position of the SRR in the unit cell. As was shown in Ref. 15 the transmission of the LH structure with gaps of the SRR oriented along the wires is two orders of magnitude higher than that for the LH structure with SRR “turned” by (Formula presented)
21. M. Bayindir, K. Aydin, E. Ozbay, P. Markoš, and C.M. Soukoulis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 120 (2002).