Generalized Langevin equation approach to higher-order classical response: Second-order-response time-resolved Raman experiment in [formula presented]

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2002, Pages

  Kim, Joohyun ^a   Keyes, T ^a  

^a Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LANGEVIN EQUATION; NONLINEAR FUNCTIONS; POSSION BRACKETS; QUANTUM RESPONSE FUNCTIONS;

ELECTRIC COMMUTATORS; FUNCTIONS; HARMONIC ANALYSIS; HEAVY IONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY; TENSORS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

ARTICLE;

EID: 41349112250     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.061102     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. R. Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570 (1957);
2. I. Oppenheim, Prog. Theor. Phys. 99, 369 (1989).
3. S. Saito and I. Ohmine, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 240 (1998).
4. Y. Tanimura and S. Mukamel, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 9496 (1993).
5. R.L. Murry and J.T. Fourkas, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 9726 (1997)
6. R.L. Murry, J.T. Fourkas, and T. Keyes, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 7913 (1998)
7. T. Keyes and J.T. Fourkas, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 287 (2000).
8. T. Jansen, J. Snijders, and K. Duppen, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 307 (2000);
9. J. Chem. Phys.T. JansenJ. SnijdersK. Duppen114, 10910 (2001).
10. A. Ma and R.M. Stratt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1004 (2000);(unpublished).
11. R.A. Denny and D.R. Reichman, Phys. Rev. E 63, 065101 (2001).
12. S. Saito and I. Ohmine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 207401 (2002).
13. D. Blank, L. Kauffman, and G.R. Flemming, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 3105 (1999);
14. J. Chem. Phys.D. BlankL. KauffmanG.R. Flemming113, 771 (2000).
15. V. Astinov, K. Kubarych, C. Milne, and R.J.D. Miller, Opt. Lett. 25, 853 (2000);
16. V. AstinovK. KubarychC. MilneR.J.D. MillerChem. Phys. Lett. 327, 334 (2000).
17. L. Kauffman, D. Blank, and G.R. Flemming, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 2312 (2001).
18. L. Kauffman, J. Heo, L. Ziegler, and G. R. Flemming, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 207402 (2002).
19. S. Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
20. G. Seeley and T. Keyes, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 5581 (1989);
21. T. Keyes, J. Phys. Chem. 101, 2921 (1997).
22. R.M. Stratt, Acc. Chem. Res. 28, 201 (1995).
23. H. Mori, Prog. Theor. Phys. 33, 423 (1965).
24. T. Keyes and I. Oppenheim, Phys. Rev. A 7, 1384 (1973);
25. J. Machta and I. Oppenheim, Physica A 112, 361 (1982);
26. Physica AJ. Schofield, R. Lim, and I. Oppenheim, 181, 89 (1992).
27. P. Schramm and I. Oppenheim, Physica A 137, 81 (1986).
28. R. van Zon and J. Schofield, Phys. Rev. E 65, 011106 (2002).
29. B.M. Ladanyi, T. Keyes, D.J. Tildesley, and W.B. Streett, Mol. Phys. 39, 645 (1980).
30. P. Moore and T. Keyes, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 6709 (1994).
31. T. Keyes, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 9349 (1996).
32. J. Applequist and C. Quicksall, J. Chem. Phys. 66, 3455 (1977).
33. D. Kivelson and T. Keyes, J. Chem. Phys. 57, 4599 (1972).
34. J. Kim and T. Keyes (unpublished).
35. T. Keyes and D. Kivelson, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 1786 (1971);
36. J. Chem. Phys.T. KeyesD. Kivelson56, 1876 (1972).
37. For atomic liquids (Formula presented) is explicitly (Formula presented) to a good approximation and (Formula presented) is unnecessary; the resulting expression has been evaluated by Schofield and Reichman (private communication), leading to results not too different from Ref. 9.