Multifractal spectra of chemical fields in fluid flows

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2005, Pages

  Benczik, Izabella Júlia ^a,b   Neufeld, Zoltán ^c   Tél, Tamás ^a  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK KOMPLEXER SYSTEME   (Germany)

^c CENTER FOR NONLINEAR STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION DISTRIBUTION; DENSITY FLUCTUATION; LYAPUNOV EXPONENT; MULTIFRACTAL SPECTRA;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FRACTALS; LYAPUNOV METHODS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; REACTION KINETICS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; THERMAL EFFECTS;

FLOW OF FLUIDS;

EID: 41349111632     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.016208     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Focus Issue: Active Chaotic Flow, edited by Z. Toroczkai and T. Tél, special issue of Chaos 12 (2002).
2. I. Z. Kiss et al., Physica D 176, 67 (2003): 183, 175 (2003).
3. I. Z. Kiss et al., Physica D 176, 67 (2003): 183, 175 (2003).
4. C. Lopez, Z. Neufeld, E. Hernandez-Garcia, and P. H. Haynes, Phys. Chem. Earth, Part B 26, 313 (2001).
5. A. P. Martin, Prog. Oceanogr. 57, 125 (2003).
6. P. H. Haynes, in Mixing: Chaos and Turbulence edited by H. Chaté and E. Villermaux(Kluwer, Dordretch, 1999).
7. A. Wonhas and J. C. Vassilicos, Phys. Rev. E 65, 051111 (2002).
8. Z. Toroczkai, Gy. Károlyi, Á. Péntek, T. Tél, and C. Grebogi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 500 (1998).
9. Gy. Károlyi, Á. Péntek, Z. Toroczkai, T. Tél, and C. Grebogi, Phys. Rev. E 59, 5468 (1999).
10. Gy. Károlyi, Á. Péntek, I. Scheuring, T. Tél, and Z. Toroczkai, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 13661 (2000).
11. T. Tél, G. Károlyi, Á. Péntek, I. Scheuring, Z. Toroczkai, C. Grebogi, and J. Kadtke, Chaos 10, 89 (2000).
12. M. Chertkov, Phys. Fluids 10, 3017 (1998); 11, 2257 (1999).
13. M. Chertkov, Phys. Fluids 10, 3017 (1998); 11, 2257 (1999).
14. Z. Neufeld, C. López, and P. H. Haynes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2606 (1999).
15. Z. Neufeld, C. Lopez, E. Hernandez-Garcia, and T. Tél, Phys. Rev. E 61, 3857 (2000).
16. E. Hernandez-Garcia, C. Lopez, and Z. Neufeld, inChaos in Geophysical Flows, edited by G. Bofetta, G. Lacorata, G. Visconti, and A. Vulpiani (OTTO Editore, Torino, 2003).
17. E. R. Abraham and M. M. Bowen, Chaos 12, 373 (2002).
18. E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1993.
19. E. Ott, Y. Du, K. R. Sreenivasan, A. Juneja, and A. K. Suri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2654 (1992).
20. Y. Du and E. Ott, J. Fluid Mech. 257, 265 (1993).
21. Y. Du and E. Ott, Physica D 67, 387 (1993).
22. Y. Du, T. Tél, and E. Ott, Physica D 76, 168 (1994).
23. S. Vainshtein et al., Phys. Rev. E 50, 1823 (1994).
24. J. Sukhatme and R. T. Pierrehumbert, Chaos 12, 439 (2002).
25. R. T. Pierrehumbert, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 4, 1091 (1994).
26. T. Halsey et al., Phys. Rev. A 33, 1141 (1986).
27. q the same relation as Eq. (3.15) directly from Eq. (3.5). In this case the suitable ε range is no longer restricted by Eq.(3.11) to a limited region in ε and the measurements' errors become smaller.