Zero-temperature properties of RNA secondary structures

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2002, Pages

  Marinari, Enzo ^a   Pagnani, Andrea ^a   Ricci Tersenghi, Federico ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÀ DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMISTRY; GROUND STATE; HAMILTONIANS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; STATISTICAL MECHANICS; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT;

COUPLING PERTURBING METHOD; ENERGY DIFFERENCES; GLASSY PHASE; SCALING EXPONENTS;

RNA;

EID: 41349097264     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.041919     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. C. Branden and J. Tooze, Introduction to Protein Structure (Garland Publishing, New York, 1991).
2. R. F. Gesteland and J. F. Atkins, The RNA World: The Nature of Modern RNA Suggests a Prebiotic RNA World (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1993).
3. I. Tinoco Jr. and C. Bustamante, J. Mol. Biol. 293, 271 (1999).
4. I. L. Hofacker, W. Fontana, P. F. Stadler, S. Bonhoeffer, M. Tacker, and P. Schuster, Monatsch. Chem. 125, 167 (1994).
5. R. Nussinov and A. B. Jacobson, Proc. Nad. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 6309 (1980).
6. M. Zuker and P. Stiegler, Nucleic Acids Res. 125, 133 (1981).
7. P. G. Higgs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 704 (1996).
8. A. Pagnani, G. Parisi, and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2026 (2000).
9. A. K. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1382 (2001).
10. A. Pagnani, G. Parisi, and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1383 (2001).
11. R. Bundschuh and T. Hwa, e-print cond-mat/0106029.
12. R. Bundschuh and T. Hwa, e-print cond-mat/0107210.
13. F. Krzakala, M. Mézard, and M. Müller, e-print cond-mat/0108374.
14. P. G. Higgs, Q. Rev. Biophys. 33, 199 (2000).
15. S. Caracciolo, G. Parisi, S. Patarnello, and N. Sourlas, Europhys. Lett. 11, 783 (1990).
16. M. Mézard, J. Phys. (Paris) 51, 1831 (1990).
17. F. Krzakala and O. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3013 (2000); M. Palassini and A. P. Young, ibid. 85, 3017 (2000); E. Marinari and G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. B 62, 11 677 (2000); Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3887 (2001).
18. F. Krzakala and O. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3013 (2000); M. Palassini and A. P. Young, ibid. 85, 3017 (2000); E. Marinari and G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. B 62, 11 677 (2000); Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3887 (2001).
19. F. Krzakala and O. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3013 (2000); M. Palassini and A. P. Young, ibid. 85, 3017 (2000); E. Marinari and G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. B 62, 11 677 (2000); Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3887 (2001).
20. F. Krzakala and O. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3013 (2000); M. Palassini and A. P. Young, ibid. 85, 3017 (2000); E. Marinari and G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. B 62, 11 677 (2000); Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3887 (2001).
21. W. L. McMillan, J. Phys. C 17, 3179 (1984); A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 57 (1987); D. S. Fisher and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 38, 373 (1988).
22. W. L. McMillan, J. Phys. C 17, 3179 (1984); A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 57 (1987); D. S. Fisher and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 38, 373 (1988).
23. W. L. McMillan, J. Phys. C 17, 3179 (1984); A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 57 (1987); D. S. Fisher and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 38, 373 (1988).
24. R. Bundschuh and T. Hwa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1479 (1999).
25. D. H. Mathews, J. Sabina, M. Zucker, and H. Turner, J. Mol. Biol. 288, 911 (1999).
26. A. K. Hartmann and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, e-print cond-mat/0108307; F. Krzakala and O. C. Martin, Europhys. Lett. 53, 749 (2001).
27. A. K. Hartmann and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, e-print cond-mat/0108307; F. Krzakala and O. C. Martin, Europhys. Lett. 53, 749 (2001).
28. M. Mézard, G. Parisi, and M. A. Virasoro, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986).
29. In the models studied here we do not try a quantitative, detailed comparison to experimental results, and so we only select pairing energies of the correct experimental order of magnitude.
30. The D model has θ= 0, since, for a finite range of d values, its ∏(ΔE,d,L) has a δ function in ΔE=0 that implies the presence of a gap (energy levels are discretized), so that the integral in Eq. (4) is finite for any L and ε small enough.