Response of a catalytic reaction to periodic variation of the CO pressure: Increased CO 2 production and dynamic phase transition

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2005, Pages

  Machado, Erik ^a   Buendia, Gloria M ^a   Rikvold, Per Arne ^b   Ziff, Robert M ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD SIMÓN BOLÍVAR   (Venezuela)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATALYTIC REACTIONS; EXPONENT RATIOS; ISING MODELS; STATISTICAL MODELS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CATALYST ACTIVITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OSCILLATIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PHASE TRANSITIONS; PRESSURE EFFECTS; RATE CONSTANTS;

CARBON MONOXIDE;

EID: 41349097078     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.016120     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. H. J. Jensen, Self-Organized Criticality: Emergent Complex Behavior in Physical and Biological Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1998).
2. J. Marro and R. Dickman, Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in Lattice Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999).
3. K. Christmann, Introduction to Surface Physical Chemistry (Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt, 1991); V. P. Z. Zhdanov and B. Kazemo, Surf. Sci. Rep. 20, 111 (1994).
4. K. Christmann, Introduction to Surface Physical Chemistry (Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt, 1991); V. P. Z. Zhdanov and B. Kazemo, Surf. Sci. Rep. 20, 111 (1994).
5. G. C. Bond, Catalysis: Principles and Applications (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987).
6. R. Imbhil and G. Ertl, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 95, 697 (1995).
7. M. Ehsasi, M. Matloch, O. Frank, J. H. Block, K. Christmann, F. S. Rys, and W. Hirschwald, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 4949 (1989).
8. G. Vaporciyan, A. Annapragada, and E. Gulari, Chem. Eng. Sci. 43, 2957 (1988).
9. M. B. Cutlip, C. J. Hawkins, D. Mukesh, W. Morton, and C. N. Kenney, Chem. Eng. Commun. 22, 329 (1983).
10. L. L. Hegedus, C. C. Chang, D. J. McEwen, and E. M. Sloan, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 19, 367 (1980).
11. T. Matsushima, H. Hashimoto, and I. Toyoshima, J. Catal. 58, 303 (1979).
12. A. Golchet and J. M. White, J. Catal. 53, 266 (1978).
13. K. Christmann and G. Ertl, Z. Naturforsch. A 28, 1144 (1973).
14. R. M. Ziff, E. Gulari, and Y. Barshad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2553 (1986).
15. A. C. López and E. V. Albano, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 3890 (2000).
16. M. Tammaro and J. W. Evans, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 762 (1998).
17. T. Tomé and R. Dickman, Phys. Rev. E 47, 948 (1993).
18. E. Machado, G. M. Buendia, and P. A. Rikvold (to be published).
19. T. Tome and M. J. de Oliveira, Phys. Rev. A 41, 4251 (1990).
20. J. F. F. Mendes and J. S. Lage, J. Stat. Phys. 64, 653 (1991).
21. M. Acharyya, Phys. Rev. E 56, 1234 (1997).
22. M. Acharyya, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2407 (1997).
23. B. Chakrabarti and M. Acharyya, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 847 (1999).
24. S. W. Sides, P. A. Rikvold, and M. A. Novotny, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 834 (1998); Phys. Rev. E 59, 2710 (1999).
25. S. W. Sides, P. A. Rikvold, and M. A. Novotny, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 834 (1998); Phys. Rev. E 59, 2710 (1999).
26. G. Komiss, C. J. White, P. A. Rikvold, and M. A. Novotny, Phys. Rev. E 63, 016120 (2000).
27. H. Fujisaka, H. Tutu, and P. A. Rikvold, Phys. Rev. E 63, 016120 (2001); 63, 059903(E) (2001).
28. H. Fujisaka, H. Tutu, and P. A. Rikvold, Phys. Rev. E 63, 016120 (2001); 63, 059903(E) (2001).
29. G. Korniss, P. A. Rikvold, and M. A. Novotny, Phys. Rev. E 66, 056127 (2002).
30. H. Jang and J. Grimson, Phys. Rev. E 63, 066119 (2001).
31. H. Jang, J. Crimson, and C. K. Hall, Phys. Rev. B 67, 094411 (2003); Phys. Rev. E 68, 046115 (2003).
32. H. Jang, J. Crimson, and C. K. Hall, Phys. Rev. B 67, 094411 (2003); Phys. Rev. E 68, 046115 (2003).
33. T. Yasui, H. Tutu, M. Yamamoto, and H. Fujisaka, Phys. Rev. E 66, 036123 (2002); 67, 019901 (E) (2003).
34. T. Yasui, H. Tutu, M. Yamamoto, and H. Fujisaka, Phys. Rev. E 66, 036123 (2002); 67, 019901 (E) (2003).
35. K. Binder, in Finite Size Scaling and Numerical Simulation of Statistical Systems, edited by V. Privman (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990).
36. See, e.g., N. Goldenfeld, Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1992).
37. We also tried to perform fits to determine the exponent ratios, excluding the results for the smallest system size, L = 80. We did this by using Eqs. (4) and (5) with L = 100. The resulting exponent estimates, γ/ν≈1.69, β/ν≈0.35 for n=2, and β/ν≈0.21 for n=4, are strongly n-dependent and significantly violate the hyperscaling relation: 2(β/ν) + γ/ν≈2.4 for n=2 and 2(β/ν)+ γ/ν≈2.1 for n=4. These fits are thus not internally consistent, probably because the uncertainty in our data is such that the maximum range of system sizes is required to obtain reasonably accurate exponent ratios.
38. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation Theory, 2nd ed. (Taylor & Francis, London, 1992).
39. G. Kamieniarz and H. W. J. Blöte, J. Phys. A 26, 201 (1993).
40. perc=0.5555 ±0.0005.
41. CO-1 as in the standard Ising/lattice gas mapping.
42. G. Grinstein, C. Jayaprakash, and Y. He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2527 (1985).
43. K. E. Bassler and B. Schmittmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3343 (1994).