Broken space-time symmetries and mechanisms of rectification of ac fields by nonlinear (non)adiabatic response

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 10-

  Denisov, S ^a   Flach, S ^b   Ovchinnikov, A A ^b   Yevtushenko, O ^c   Zolotaryuk, Y ^d,e  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK KOMPLEXER SYSTEME   (Germany)

^c ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Italy)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^e BOGOLYUBOV INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Ukraine)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC CURRENTS; POLARIZATION; QUANTUM THEORY; RANDOM PROCESSES; RESONANCE; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE;

AC FIELDS; QUANTUM STOCHASTIC RESONANCE; SPACE-TIME SYMMETRIES; TAYLOR SERIES;

ELECTRIC FIELDS;

ARTICLE;

EID: 41349090308     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.041104     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. P. Reimann, Phys. Rep. 361, 57 (2002).
2. S. Flach, O. Yevtushenko, and Y. Zolotaryuk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2358 (2000).
3. O. Yevtushenko, S. Flach, Y. Zolotaryuk, and A.A. Ovchinnikov, Europhys. Lett. 54, 141 (2001).
4. S. Flach, Y. Zolotaryuk, A. Miroshnichenko, and M. V. Fistul, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 184101 (2002).
5. S. Flach and A.A. Ovchinnikov, Physica A 292, 268 (2001);
6. S. Flach, A. Miroshnichenko, and A.A. Ovchinnikov, Phys. Rev. B 65, 104438 (2002).
7. A.A. Ovchinnikov, e-print cond-mat/0110616.
8. Underdamped systems often display hysteretic dependence on external fields, which leads to multivalued response functions. In that case the overall symmetry of a response function is not sufficient to conclude about the current rectification. The case of Eqs. (9) and (11) in the adiabatic limit is a nice example. For (Formula presented) the ac drive is antisymmetric, yet a nonzero rectification will take place, in full accord with the symmetry analysis of the underlying equations of motion.
9. R. Bartussek, P. Hänggi, and J.G. Kissner, Europhys. Lett. 28, 459 (1994).
10. M. V. Fistul, Phys. Rev. E 65, 046621 (2002).
11. S. Scheidl and V.M. Vinokur, e-print cond-mat/0201008.
12. G. M. Zaslavsky, Physics of Chaos in Hamiltonian Systems (Imperial College Press, London, 1998).
13. S. Denisov and S. Flach, Phys. Rev. E 64, 056236 (2001);
14. S. Denisov, J. Klafter, M. Urbakh, and S. Flach, Physica D 170, 131 (2001).
15. J. Mateos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 258 (2000).
16. O. Yevtushenko, S. Flach, and K. Richter, Phys. Rev. E 61, 7215 (2000).
17. M. Vavilov, V. Ambegaokar, and I. Aleiner, Phys. Rev. B 63, 195313 (2001).
18. H. Schanz, M.-F. Otto, R. Ketzmerick, and T. Dittrich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 070601 (2001).
19. A.K. Vidybida and A.A. Serikov, Phys. Lett. 108A, 170 (1985).
20. A.W. Ghosh and S.V. Khare, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5243 (2000).
21. D. del-Castillo-Negrete, Phys. Fluids 10, 576 (1998).
22. S. Denisov, Phys. Lett. A 296, 197 (2002).
23. Z. Zheng, G. Hu, and B. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2273 (2001).
24. S. Cilla, F. Falo, and L.M. Floria, Phys. Rev. E 63, 031110 (2001).
25. P. Reimann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4992 (2001).
26. M. V. Fistul (private communication).