The agonistic approach: Reframing resistance in qualitative research

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 466-488

  Vitus, Kathrine ^a  

^a VIVE THE DANISH CENTER FOR SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Political agonisms; Research identities; Resistance dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 41349084815     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800407309331     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adam, B. (1978). Survival of domination: Inferiorization and everyday life. New York: Elsevier/Greenwood.
2. Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research: Qualitative research methods (Vol. 6). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. (2002). The reluctant respondent. In J. F. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 515-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Åkerstrøm Andersen, N. (2001). Polyphonic organizations (Working Paper 13). Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy.
5. Andersen, K.V. (2005). Problembørn, pædagoger og perkere-identitet og ambivalens i mødet mellem etniske minoritetsbørn og systemet [Identity and ambivalence in the meeting between ethnic minority children and the social system]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
6. Angrosino, M.V., & Peréz, K.A. (2000). Rethinking observation. From method to context. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2 nd ed., pp. 673-702). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1999). Understanding. In The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society (pp. 607-626). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
9. Bourdieu, P., & Waquant, L.J.D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge, UK: Policy.
10. Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. DeVault, M.L., & McCoy, L. (2002). Institutional ethnography. Using interviews to investigate ruling relations. In J. F. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 751-775). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13. Eder, D., & Fingerson, L. (2002). Interviewing children and adolescents. In J. F. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 181-201). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punishment. New York: Vintage.
15. Gubrium, J.F., & Holstein, J.A. (1999). The self in a world of going concerns. Symbolic Interaction, 23(2), 95-115.
16. Gubrium, J.F., & Holstein, J.A. (2001). Institutional selves: Troubled identities in a post-modern world. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Holstein, J.A., & Gubrium, J.F. (1995). The active interview. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Jakobsen, T.B. (2004). Legitimitetens logik. Institutionelle dilemmaer i det sociale klagesystem [The logic of legitimacy. Institutional dilemmas within the social appeal system]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
19. Mouffe, C. (2003). Politik og lidenskaber: Hvad er på spil i demokratiet ? [Politics and passion. What is at stake in democracies ?]. Distrinction, 7, 119 - 127.
20. Scott, J.C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Scott, R.W. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Smith, D.E. (1990). Texts, facts, femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. New York: Routhledge.
23. Smith, D.E. (1996). The relations of ruling: A feminist inquiry. Studies in Culture, Organizations and Societies, 2, 171 - 190.
24. Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of a feminist ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.